6 Reasons To Buy A PlayStation 3 Instead Of An Xbox 360

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Chrispy
    Needs a hobby
    • Dec 2008
    • 11403

    6 Reasons To Buy A PlayStation 3 Instead Of An Xbox 360

    If you still don’t have a current generation video game console, you may want to consider the PlayStation 3 over the Xbox 360. Here’s why.

    When it comes to console gaming, it’s close to a toss-up between Sony‘s PlayStation 3 and Microsoft‘s Xbox 360. If you’re a serious Nintendo fan, the Wii makes sense. For most gamers, however, the Wii is not a serious enough piece of hardware. The Wii U may change that, but questions linger as to whether the Wii U will be left in the dust by its next-gen competitors, and what that means for the Wii U game lineup.

    Looking at just this generation hardware, assuming you’re still in the market for a new console, should you buy a PS3 or an Xbox 360? I have both, and both are great machines, but in the end the PS3 is the better buy.

    While I do think the Xbox 360 controller is better for first-person-shooters, the PS3 controller is just as good (if not better) for just about everything else.

    And while the Xbox Live metro-style aesthetic is nice to look at, it’s no more functional than the PS3′s UI and nowhere near as simple to use (at least until you figure it out.)
    Forbes’s David Ewalt had a great story recently on Microsoft’s success with the Xbox 360, and there’s reason to believe this success will continue, at least in North America, with its next-gen successor. But that success doesn’t mean its the best choice for either hardcore or casual gamers.

    Here are five reasons the PS3 is ultimately the better choice (for most of you.)

    1. The PlayStation Network is free. Sure, sometimes the PSN goes down or is taken down by hackers, a problem Microsoft has done a better job avoiding, but Xbox Live Gold will cost you $50 a year. That’s $50 more than you’ll pay to play online games on the PSN.

    As Paul Tassi notes, if you’re paying for Xbox Live it’s not like you get a discount on Netflix or Hulu or any other app. You’re just paying twice. Fifty bucks a year isn’t a make-or-break deal, but it’s enough to buy an extra game per year ad infinitum.

    If the Xbox 720 costs the same per year as the 360 does, and the PS4 maintains its free PSN access, then the next-gen decision will be just as easy to make.

    2. The PS3 has a Blu-ray drive. If you’re like me and my family, most of your media these days is streaming. Still, especially for animated movies likeHow to Train Your Dragon and anything from Pixar, as well as other big-screen flicks like The Avengers or The Dark Knight series, the Blu-ray can make a big difference, both in terms of visuals and sound.

    It also means there’s more room per disc for PS3 titles over Xbox 360 titles, allowing for somewhat noticeable improvements in graphics on PS3 versions of many games, and – perhaps even more importantly – allowing each title to fit on one disc. There are few things more annoying than having to stand up and switch out an Xb0x 360 disc in the middle of a game.


    LittleBigPlanet Karting will have Move wheel support

    3. The PS3 has better exclusive titles. Unless you’re a big fan of Halo orGears of War, PlayStation 3 simply has better Sony exclusives than the Xbox 360.
    I’m not a big Uncharted fan, but if you like Indiana Jones-style cinematic games, you can’t do much better than the Naughty Dog’s adventure franchise.God of War may be stretching itself a bit thin at this point, but the action-Greek-myth hack-and-slash title is still a big draw.

    From Software’s Demon’s Souls is, quite frankly, reason enough all by its lonesome to choose the PlayStation 3 over the competition.

    Other exclusives include the LittleBigPlanet franchise, including the upcoming Karting installment, as well as PSN games like The Unfinished Swan, which is one of the most intriguing looking titles I’ve seen in a while.

    Meanwhile, many popular titles like Call of Duty are cross-platform, and many Xbox exclusives are also available on PC (though not nearly enough – seriously, why isn’t every Halo game a PC title as well?)

    4. The PlayStation 3 controller is rechargeable. Never underestimate how truly irritating batteries can be. I own Dark Souls on Xbox 360, and in the middle of a serious boss fight (Smough and Ornstein) my controller died.

    This was my first attempt at the boss, and I’d summoned an NPC and another player to help me in the battle. Just as we entered and began doing battle my character froze up. I clicked madly at the buttons, watching my life drain before my eyes, unable to block, roll, run or fight. Then the message box appeared, saying that my controller was no longer connected.
    Had this been a PS3 game I could have, theoretically, leaped from the couch, bounded across the living room, plugged the controller into the console and saved my life. Since it was Xbox 360 I didn’t even try. I would have had to find the batteries, first of all, if we even had any. Sure, it was my fault for letting the controller die, but there’s something to be said for a rechargeable controller in terms of convenience, especially for lazy oblivious people like myself.


    Random question: In a fight, could the Kinect beat up the Pixar lamp?

    5. The Kinect isn’t ready for the big leagues. Naturally, you don’tneed to buy a Kinect or any other motion-gimmick-hardware, but the Kinect does seem to occupy an overly-large parcel of psychological real estate at Microsoft. There’s a plethora of new Kinect titles, and very few top-notch new Xbox 360 exclusives hitting the market these days. Is Microsoft placing too many eggs in its Kinect basket? If so, it’s worrisome.

    For one thing, the Kinect is not nearly what it’s cracked out to be. We’ve played mostly demos for the Kinect, but it’s been a really frustrating experience for both us and our five-year-old. It constantly drops players and is about as far from precise as you can get.

    Don’t get me wrong – the concept is fantastic, and some of the games are fun, especially for kids. I imagine a future generation of Kinect may be a good selling point for the Xbox 360/720/etc. but this time around, I’d worry more about Microsoft and Xbox 360 developers paying too much attention to a device that’s only half-ready, neglecting non-motion-controller games in the process.

    6. Last, but not least, is the PS Vita, Sony’s latest and greatest hand-held gaming device. The world may be moving toward mobile, but the PS Vita is a really impressive gaming machine that can connect directly to your PS3. If you want hand-held games, Microsoft still has some serious catching up to do. If you go with a Vita, you’ll be better off pairing it with a PS3 than an Xbox 360.
    ~
    What do you think? Outside of a handful of good Xbox 360 exclusives, is there anything else that makes that console better than Sony’s PS3? Did I miss any compelling reasons to buy the PS3 over the Xbox 360?

    Final thought: Better still, build yourself a gaming PC. Sure, not every title will make it to PC, but you’ll have a much wider array of indie titles to choose from, as well as mods and customizations that make consoles pale in comparison. Still better: buy all three because, you know, you’re made out of money, right?


    Forbes - If you still don’t have a current generation video game console, you may want to consider the PlayStation 3 over the Xbox 360. Here’s why.
  • Swarley
    A Special Kind of Cat
    • Jul 2010
    • 11213

    #2
    People should just grow up, be real gamers and own both consoles.

    At this point in the generation, I'd definitely go with the PS3 due to the exclusives.

    As for #4, just get some rechargeable battery packs. I have 2 for my 360, a charging stand, and a charging cable, never have a problem. Also, the design of the 360 controller would get my thumbs up over the internal batteries of the PS3.

    But like I said, at this point in the generation, if I had to pick only one, I'd go with the PS3 due to it's exclusive titles.

    Comment

    • July 4 1776
      Proud Vikings Lover
      • Oct 2008
      • 1526

      #3
      1 2 and 3 are valid points however 4 5 and 6 are a reach. In xboxes defense you have a considerably better online experience, a bigger group of people the play online, better abilities to talk to friends, and a better controller. Also theres a lot less lag in the 360 experience as the developers have complained at times about the ps3s shotty at times network.
      SKOL VIKINGS ALL DAY MVP

      Comment

      • Primetime
        Thank You Prince
        • Nov 2008
        • 17526

        #4
        1. $50 is worth it for the better service.
        2. I've yet to watch anything blu-ray. Even so, you can buy a blu-ray player for $30 these days.
        3. Halo 4 alone makes the 360 the better exclusive for 2013.
        4. LOL at this stupidity.
        5. All motion gaming is stupid.
        6. Love my Vita.

        Comment

        • Swarley
          A Special Kind of Cat
          • Jul 2010
          • 11213

          #5
          Originally posted by Primetime
          5. All motion gaming is stupid.

          Comment

          • ThomasTomasz
            • Dec 2024

            #6
            I have both, but I'll pick the 360 for every non-exclusive because of party chat, and the fact that most of my gaming friends have been gaming since the original Xbox, and no ones broken that up.

            Comment

            • July 4 1776
              Proud Vikings Lover
              • Oct 2008
              • 1526

              #7
              And this http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/06/...erful-problems

              Btw how is move since you have kinect on this list lol. Just saying you should have done a comapre and contrast and not seemed so biased
              SKOL VIKINGS ALL DAY MVP

              Comment

              • Swarley
                A Special Kind of Cat
                • Jul 2010
                • 11213

                #8
                Originally posted by July 4 1776
                And this http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/06/...erful-problems

                Btw how is move since you have kinect on this list lol. Just saying you should have done a comapre and contrast and not seemed so biased
                That wasn't the point of that part. It's that Xbox is putting too much emphasis on Kinect, and not paying attention to the core gamers. Sony knows that motion gaming is just a whatever thing, and if people want it, cool, if they don't, then we wont shove it down your throat. Microsoft thinks that everyone NEEDS motion gaming and that every big title needs something that involves Kinect (which is just stupid).

                Comment

                • CrimsonGhost56
                  True Blue
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 5981

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Primetime
                  3. The Last of Us alone makes the PS3 the better exclusive for 2013.
                  fixed

                  Comment

                  • Maynard
                    stupid ass titles
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 17876

                    #10
                    this article is a great troll attempt.

                    #1 the PSN is free - well so what....free doesnt make up for laggy connections and a half asses community. I would rather pay for a quality service than one that gets hacked and runs like shit half the time

                    #2 the Blu Ray drive - again, who cares? the same people who rave about the blu ray drive are the same ones who only use netflix. having blue ray only matters if you actually use it.

                    #3 Better Exclusives - better? maybe. They do have more of them. But more doesnt mean better. Alot of their exclusives are not worth paying $60 for. Do you want to pay $60 for LBP2? or pay $60 for resistance? why pay for resistance and have nobody to play with when you can buy battlefield or COD (which are both way better) and have friends to play with. Uncharted 2 and 3 are no doubt fantastic games, but while you are off playing those, your friends will be off playing those great non exclusive titles on XBL

                    #4 the ps3 controller has rechargable batteries. No doubt this is a big deal...that is until you spend $15 on a rechargeable battery pack from the drug store. The PS3 controller is shit compared to the 360 controller for gaming. So its well worth it to buy a set of rechargeable. I do agree that having a built in battery is nice for the ps3 controller though.

                    #5 Kinect - Really? motion gaming sucks....end of story

                    #6 PS Vita - did twigg write this article?

                    Aside from the obvious fanboy aspect to this article, it annoys me that some of the really great things about the ps3 were left out of the discussion. Things that are legitimate reasons for someone to buy a ps3 rather than a 360. Things like PS+, built in wi fi (although the 360 has that now), HD cables, better media center, more reliability and better durability, Sunday Ticket, overall value for the cost.

                    There are real reasons to choose a ps3 over 360, just not any of these idiotic fanboy reasons.

                    Comment

                    • ryne candy
                      Aggie C/O '01
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 4355

                      #11
                      As far as whether or not we should pay for Live/PSN, I think that boat has sailed in what people think about the services. By the numbers of Xbox connected, I think most people think they get better service because they pay for it. I was taught in a marketing class, lowering prices is not always the right decision. People purchase things sometimes based on the recognition they will get by showing it off. This means if a person buys an expensive watch, shirt, shoes, car....they do so knowing others will see them in it and think they are of a higher income bracket (usually). If Rolex watches suddenly sold for $50 bucks, pretty soon they would be considered the new Swatch Watch. By spending $60 (@ MSRP) for online gaming, they make themselves believe they are in a club that gets good service.

                      Comment

                      • leaffan
                        Colton Orr Fan
                        • Feb 2009
                        • 11082

                        #12
                        Stopped reading here:

                        . The PlayStation Network is free. Sure, sometimes the PSN goes down or is taken down by hackers, a problem Microsoft has done a better job avoiding, but Xbox Live Gold will cost you $50 a year. That’s $50 more than you’ll pay to play online games on the PSN...
                        Find articles not written by 13 year olds or twigg clones please.

                        Leafs offseason training!

                        Comment

                        • BigBucs
                          Unpretentious
                          • May 2009
                          • 12758

                          #13




                          Comment

                          • SethMode
                            Master of Mysticism
                            • Feb 2009
                            • 5754

                            #14
                            If you still don’t have a current generation video game console, you're probably poor and should consider a different hobby that is more financially responsible.

                            Comment

                            • Rip
                              Junior Member
                              • Aug 2011
                              • 584

                              #15
                              Wii is free, has better exclusives, better motion gaming and has a weather channel. Therefor Wii > PS3

                              Comment

                              Working...