Dell's Good, Bad & Ugly Movie Reviews

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rivers17ncsu
    Amerson For Thorpe!
    • Mar 2010
    • 1246

    Originally posted by wingsfan77
    I was very disappointed by "Date Night" I'm a huge Carrell fan but I didn't think the movie was very funny at all.

    I agree. The scene that got the most laughs with the people I was with was the Taxi Cab scene
    "It's the revenge of the dicks that's nine cocks that cock nines"

    Comment

    • Coach
      Junior Member
      • Aug 2009
      • 611

      Check out I Spit on Your Grave....the original and remake. Both are equally good IMO...unlike Last House on the Left. Original was better...from what I remember.

      Comment

      • dell71
        Enter Sandman
        • Mar 2009
        • 23919

        Originally posted by Coach
        Check out I Spit on Your Grave....the original and remake. Both are equally good IMO...unlike Last House on the Left. Original was better...from what I remember.
        You gotta check out the very first post of the thread. It has a complete list of all the movies reviewed within. I have done the original here. Hopefully, I'll be getting to the remake soon.

        Comment

        • Coach
          Junior Member
          • Aug 2009
          • 611

          Originally posted by dell71
          You gotta check out the very first post of the thread. It has a complete list of all the movies reviewed within. I have done the original here. Hopefully, I'll be getting to the remake soon.

          Funny you mention the bathtub scene...that's the only scene I can remember from the original. I saw it at a very young age...7th or 8th grade I think. My mom had a PT job at a movie rental place (Erol's) it was Blockbuster before Blockbuster became what it is/was today. My stepfather had her bring home all kind of movies home and that was one of them.

          I think you'll like the scene that mirrors that scene in the remake.

          Comment

          • tigstah
            Mr. Casual Gamer
            • Mar 2009
            • 2406

            Originally posted by wingsfan77
            I was very disappointed by "Date Night" I'm a huge Carrell fan but I didn't think the movie was very funny at all.
            :iagree:

            i saw it a few months ago. it had funny moments, overall not very funny

            Comment

            • Houston
              Back home
              • Oct 2008
              • 21231

              Just found out Mila Kunis is in Date Night, definetely gonna watch it now.

              Comment

              • dell71
                Enter Sandman
                • Mar 2009
                • 23919


                The Last Airbender
                Directed by M. Night Shyamalan.
                2010. Rated PG, 103 minutes.
                Cast:
                Noah Ringer
                Dev Patel
                Nicola Peltz
                Jackson Rathbone
                Shaun Toub
                Aasif Mandvi
                Cliff Curtis
                Seychelle Gabriel

                Each of the world’s four nations is built around one of four elements: fire, air, water and earth. Within each nation there are “benders,” people who can control whichever element their nation is named after. With all the body motion they have to use to do this, it seems they have advanced abilities in tai-chi. I’ll never look at those old folks in the park quite the same.

                The Fire Nation is a militaristic bunch determined to rule everyone and everything. They’ve already imprisoned all of the earthbenders and wiped out the Air Nation. The Southern Water Nation only has one bender, who isn’t that good and the Northern Water Nation live in an impenetrable fort which they never leave. I get that. Why bother with the rest of these clowns if they don’t have to? Anyhoo, to complete their world domination the Fire Nation has to do two things. They have to figure out a way to gain control of the Northern Water Nation and they have to find and capture The Avatar should he be resurrect…er…born aga…I mean…reincarnated. You know The Avatar, big blue guy, long hair that connects to the trees, controlled by a guy in a wheelchair. Wait…what? Right, not that Avatar. In this case, The Avatar is the only person with the power to bend all four elements. It’s up to him to restore a little law and order around this place. There’s a new sheriff in town and his name is Reggie Hammond! Huh? Oh yeah, not that movie, either. Our hero, is actually a little boy named Aang (Ringer). This is not a spoiler in any way. We figure out he’s The Avatar in about 10 seconds and are told as much about 10 seconds later. If you’ve watched the cartoon, you already knew. That reminds me, it should be noted for children’s-television-impaired, this is based on a Nickelodeon cartoon that came out a few years before the overhyped James Cameron flick. And if you’re too young or just not cinematically versed enough to understand the Reggie Hammond reference, google it, then go watch that movie. Now. Right now. Well, after you finish reading this review, of course.

                Back to this movie. It’s been some time since I watched the tv show. If memory serves, this is a pretty faithful adaptation. I don’t notice anything markedly different. Sure, the dialogue is of the comic-book, post-Yoda, faux-spiritual variety and it gets kind of hokey. Both of these things are true of its source material. The action scenes and special fx work and create a nice sense of adventure. If there is a difference, it is in tone. In typical M. Night fashion, TLA takes itself too seriously. The cartoon has a sense of humor. For the most part, this does not.

                There is some deserved backlash for the casting. Basically, Aang’s two sidekicks and a few others are obviously miscast. This has to do with their race. In the cartoon, each nation is made up people who share an ethnicity. This is not quite the case, here. The Fire and Earth nations are fairly consistent, but the two Water nations are not. In short, the two sidekicks are in the wrong nation.

                Still, I just don’t get all the hate this film receives. This is hard for me to say because I generally despise this director’s work. I am a member of the “M. Night Shyamalan (and Tyler Perry) Must Be Stopped” committee. I’ve heard nothing but disparaging remarks about it. I’m even a guy who is sensitive to white actors being cast in roles clearly calling for non-white characters. I was fully prepared to hate this movie. I just don’t.

                MY SCORE: 6/10

                Comment

                • dell71
                  Enter Sandman
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 23919


                  The White Ribbon
                  Directed by Michael Haneke.
                  2009. Rated R, 144 minutes, German.
                  Cast:
                  Christian Friedel
                  Ernst Jacobi
                  Leonie Benesch
                  Ulrich Tukur
                  Ursina Lardi
                  Fion Mutert
                  Michael Kranz
                  Burghart Klaussner
                  Maria-Victoria Dragus
                  Leonard Proxauf

                  The village doctor has a serious accident on his way home, one day. Someone used a very strong, thin and barely visible wire tied between two trees to trip the horse he was riding on. Yes, I said horse. Our movie begins about 1916, if my math is right. We’re not explicitly told. Anyhoo, the doc breaks his collarbone and is off to the nearest hospital and out of sight for roughly half the movie. This is first in a series of bizarre occurrences in the village. For most of these events, the culprit is unknown. Whodunit becomes the question that dominates the landscape.

                  Between the strange, heinous crimes, we get to know the villagers. The local school teacher serves as our narrator. In true early 20th century fashion, he’s courting a 17 year old girl with intentions to marry her. There is the rich baron who employs half the town. No one in town really likes him, but hey, he’s the boss. We have the poor family who lost their matriarch to a work accident. Since she worked for the baron, some of them blame him for her demise. The doctor’s next door neighbor takes care of his kids while he’s in the hospital. There’s more to her than that, but I don’t want to spoil it. The town reverend is a crusty Old Testament type who doles out punishment to his children in biblical proportions for their indiscretions.

                  Speaking of punishment, it is at the center of all things in TWR. There is always some act or another deemed worthy of penalty. Those penalties include lashings, mandatory ribbon wearing, being tied up every night and termination from employment, to name a few. The victims of the seemingly random crimes appear to be being punished, too. For what, isn’t always clear. As who is responsible comes into focus, it raises other questions.

                  When the end credits begin to roll, an entire way of life has been put on trial. Are the various methods of punishment effective or excessive? Are the misdeeds real or perceived? Is Christianity, or religion in general, too rigid? How does all this effect the children? There is much to discuss.

                  Aside from the questions it raises, the movie itselfe is an intriguing mystery. It is also packed with family drama revealing various levels of dysfunction within the families of the village. However, it is also slow. Most, if not all of the punishing takes place off-screen. We merely watch them talk about it, and they speak very calmly. Though the dialogue they deliver while almost never raising their voices is exceptionally written, I can see this being a difficult watch for many.

                  MY SCORE: 7.5/10

                  Comment

                  • Tailback U
                    No substitute 4 strength.
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 10282

                    Dell, didn't see Animal Kingdom on your index. Highly recommended for everyone. Interested in reading your review at some point.

                    Comment

                    • dell71
                      Enter Sandman
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 23919


                      Let Me In
                      Directed by Matt Reeves.
                      2010. Rated R, 116 minutes.
                      Cast:
                      Chloë Grace Moretz
                      Kodi Smit-McPhee
                      Richard Jenkins
                      Cara Buono
                      Elias Koteas
                      Sasha Barrese
                      Dylan Kenin
                      Richie Coster
                      Dylan Minnette

                      Owen (Smit-McPhee) is twelve years old and has no friends. Even worse, he’s the class punching bag. Things are so bad, he hangs out alone at night, in the courtyard of his apartment complex and fantasizes about getting revenge. If that weren’t enough, he lives with his mom who’s in the process of divorcing his dad and is an emotional wreck. One night, he notices a girl his age moving into the apartment next door to his with her father. Eventually, we find out her name is Abby (Moretz). As it turns out, she’s also a loner who seeks solitude in the courtyard most nights. Even though, it’s the dead of winter she doesn’t wear shoes. Owen notices this and also finds out rather quickly that she leads some sort of tortured existence, as well. The two seemingly kindred spirits strike up a friendship. However, Owen doesn’t realize something we already know. Abby is a vampire.

                      To remain as conspicuous as possible, Abby’s “father” (Jenkins) supplies her with blood by killing random people, draining the blood from them and carrying it back to her. Whenever he fails at this task, or hunger overwhelms her, she has to hunt for her own meals. Let’s just say her table manners are less than desirable.

                      The movie’s pace is deliberately slow but it doesn’t drag. It draws us in through the growing relationship between Owen and Abby. It also never forgets that there are murders being committed so the police are working feverishly to find out who’s responsible. All along, we wonder what will happen when things get figured out? What will happen when Owen comes to understand what Abby really is? What happens when the police figure it out?

                      Of course, the vampire craze of the last few years can be traced back to the Twilight series. Everything in that critic-proof juggernaut is dolled up to appeal to young girls and teach them about the virtues of abstinence. While that’s a fine message it’s done in a manner that makes the idea of vampires even less tangible than it already is. It’s not just fantasy. It’s impossibly sanitized so that any thoughts deemed to be impure are like the greatest evils know to mankind. On the other hand, any good things are romanticized to the nth degree. In short, the Twilight films alternately panders to and preaches to its audience on a continuous basis.

                      In Let Me In, the characters are not in some totally foreign dimension where everything is glossy and nice where vampires can go out in the daytime and wean themselves from human blood. Instead, the vampire is dropped into our reality. This offers insight into what it might be like if there really were such a creature in our midst. To understand the difference between this world and the Twilight world think about the Batman movies. Specifically, think of how Gotham City is portrayed in the recent Christopher Nolan movies and in the franchise-killing Joel Schumacher flicks. LMI would be the Nolan films, not quite fully realistic but enough to seem a lot more plausible.

                      For those of us lucky enough to have seen it, there is yet another elephant in the room. That one is the Swedish original, less than two years old when its American remake hit theaters. Technically, like its predecessor, LMI claims to be based on the novel Let the Right One In. The Swedish film keeps the full title while this one truncates it. Otherwise, there’s not enough of a difference for me to say it isn’t a remake. There are some changes here and there. Most notably, there is one glaring omission and one event moved to the beginning of the film. The omission is the now infamous crotch shot of our vampire. The event involves the father and is key to the movie so I won’t spoil that.

                      The fact that this is largely the same movie is not a knock on the American flick. It wisely follows the template already created. Aside from the omission I mentioned, it doesn’t water things down, at all. Unlike most remakes, the additions don’t become subtractions. There are no overly big showy moments for no reason other than injecting some perceived excitement. To its credit, the one recognizably American thing it did actually works. It adds a little more gore. However, it does so for good reason and not at the cost of character development as is often the case. It is rare that a remake can stand up to the original, particularly when the remake is American and the original is not. This one does. What I’m going to say next may seem even stranger than that. When the subtitleophobes tell you this one is better, ignore that they’re probably basing their opinion solely on the fact it’s in English. They might actually be right, this time.

                      MY SCORE: 9/10

                      Comment

                      • Houston
                        Back home
                        • Oct 2008
                        • 21231

                        Whoa, was not expecting that.....



                        I thought it was gonna be just another lame slasher flick.

                        Comment

                        • Rivers17ncsu
                          Amerson For Thorpe!
                          • Mar 2010
                          • 1246

                          I haven't see the original, but I really liked Let Me In
                          "It's the revenge of the dicks that's nine cocks that cock nines"

                          Comment

                          • j.hen
                            Self Care
                            • Oct 2008
                            • 10058

                            Dell I think you should definitely check out/review K-PAX. Incredible film.

                            Comment

                            • dell71
                              Enter Sandman
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 23919

                              Originally posted by J.Hen
                              Dell I think you should definitely check out/review K-PAX. Incredible film.
                              I will.

                              Comment

                              • NAHSTE
                                Probably owns the site
                                • Feb 2009
                                • 22233

                                Nice review of Let Me In, but I still think the original is better. The one knock I have on the American version is the lack of subtlety with which it explains the relationship between the girl and the older guardian. It's a little bit more of an "oh shit" moment in the original when you figure it out, whereas in the remake they pretty much spoon feed you the dynamic of the relationship.

                                Comment

                                Working...