Official 2010 NFL Betting Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hasselbeck
    Jus' bout dat action boss
    • Feb 2009
    • 6175

    #91
    Seahawks -1.

    Normally I wouldn't touch a Seahawk game on the road, but this is practically a pick em and I think they will beat the Rams.
    Originally posted by ram29jackson
    I already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SB

    Comment

    • strahanfan92
      Meat
      • Aug 2009
      • 5456

      #92
      Originally posted by Bob Kuzzy


      Worst line of the wknd.. cant believe Vegas is giving the Giants 4.

      So is the public gonna be on the Giants or Bears, because I bet when people see the line they will be like "damn I want the Bears, but then be like wow 1-2 giants are giving the 3-0 bears 4 points, I'm going with the Giants"...?

      Comment

      • Primetime
        Thank You Prince
        • Nov 2008
        • 17526

        #93
        $200 on the Seahawks (-1) to beat the spread against the Rams.
        $50 on Jets (-5.5) to beat the spread against the Bills.
        $50 on Texans (-3) to beat the spread against the Raiders.

        Comment

        • Kuzzy Powers
          Beautiful Like Moses
          • Oct 2008
          • 12542

          #94
          Originally posted by strahanfan92
          So is the public gonna be on the Giants or Bears, because I bet when people see the line they will be like "damn I want the Bears, but then be like wow 1-2 giants are giving the 3-0 bears 4 points, I'm going with the Giants"...?
          I cannot possibly see how the public wil be on the Giants with that line.

          Comment

          • for surtain 22
            Junior Member
            • Feb 2009
            • 936

            #95
            dbl post

            Comment

            • for surtain 22
              Junior Member
              • Feb 2009
              • 936

              #96
              Originally posted by Bob Kuzzy
              I cannot possibly see how the public wil be on the Giants with that line.
              ....as if you want the public to be on your side?

              obviously no guarantees in gambling, but I'm very confident the Giants cover, and I hate the Giants.

              Comment

              • Kuzzy Powers
                Beautiful Like Moses
                • Oct 2008
                • 12542

                #97
                Originally posted by for surtain 22
                ....as if you want the public to be on your side?

                obviously no guarantees in gambling, but I'm very confident the Giants cover, and I hate the Giants.
                Sometimes you do. Like I said.. its cool to fade the public, and I sometimes follow that aswell, but sometimes the public is all over a line for a reason. Im not even saying that will be the case now, I just think Vegas did an absolutely abysmal job of putting that line at the right number.

                Comment

                • for surtain 22
                  Junior Member
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 936

                  #98
                  I think for a reason. We shall see.

                  Comment

                  • for surtain 22
                    Junior Member
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 936

                    #99
                    You goin' in heavy on the Bears then, Kuzzy?

                    Comment

                    • for surtain 22
                      Junior Member
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 936

                      Giants have moved from -3 to -4 even though the Bears are getting all of the public's money. That says the sharks are putting their money on the Giants. Obviously nothing is a lock but if you go in on the Bears I'd say go light.

                      Comment

                      • JRoZe410
                        Member
                        • Feb 2009
                        • 489

                        On my bookie's pools,I like Denver +7,Baltimore -1,Houston -4,and Chicago +3

                        Comment

                        • for surtain 22
                          Junior Member
                          • Feb 2009
                          • 936

                          Jets/Bills line jumped to Bills +7 and I think I like Bills+7 but not laying anything on it yet.
                          Jumpin on Eagles -5.5 for sure.
                          Might take Fins PCK (+100) but still debating. looking at o47.5 in that game too.

                          what do you guys like?

                          Comment

                          • for surtain 22
                            Junior Member
                            • Feb 2009
                            • 936

                            oh yeah, and I have the urge to jump on the Broncos ML (+240). Haven't done anything yet.

                            Comment

                            • Kuzzy Powers
                              Beautiful Like Moses
                              • Oct 2008
                              • 12542

                              Originally posted by for surtain 22
                              You goin' in heavy on the Bears then, Kuzzy?
                              Most definitely, on the ML too. I wont hammer it tho, the fan aspect and a regular wager will be enough.

                              Comment

                              • strahanfan92
                                Meat
                                • Aug 2009
                                • 5456




                                Started the day with $660 in my account, let's see how I do, 460 pending on those plays..

                                Comment

                                Working...