Aaron Rodgers: "I'm trying to break old habits.."

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NAHSTE
    Probably owns the site
    • Feb 2009
    • 22233

    #16
    Originally posted by ram29jackson
    being number one in a category means being the best at it.

    and when you play that long, you will of course have a lot of ints. too

    Comment

    • BrntO4Life
      My Aunt Ida Smokes.
      • Mar 2009
      • 6866

      #17
      I was going to post a lengthy statistical analysis proving that Favre's INT numbers are far higher than QBs who played at the same time as him (and after) that would be considered his peers by the untrained eye and thoughtless mind, but I remembered that you're an idiot and cancelled those plans.

      Comment

      • JBregz
        Follow me! @JBregzz
        • Nov 2008
        • 3837

        #18
        Great read.

        Follow me on twitter @JBregzz
        Follow me on twitch bitch http://www.twitch.tv/jbregz/
        Redskins TGT Scheduling Thread http://www.virtualsportsnetwork.com/...eduling-Thread

        Comment

        • bucky
          #50? WTF?
          • Feb 2009
          • 5408

          #19
          Originally posted by BrntO4Life
          I was going to post a lengthy statistical analysis proving that Favre's INT numbers are far higher than QBs who played at the same time as him (and after) that would be considered his peers by the untrained eye and thoughtless mind, but I remembered that you're an idiot and cancelled those plans.
          It wasn't just the number of ints, but also the timeliness of the ints.

          Brett Favre =
          GOAT regular season
          average in the playoffs.

          Bart Starr =
          above average regular season
          Phenomenal in the playoffs.

          Starr > Favre.

          Aaron Rodgers has a chance to be better than Starr.

          Comment

          • Tailback U
            No substitute 4 strength.
            • Nov 2008
            • 10282

            #20
            I haven't looked at the stats or checked a source but I was listening to the radio today and the host and some other analyst were talking about no QB in the history of the league has put up the numbers that Rodgers has over the last 20 games.

            Comment

            • Villain
              [REDACTED]
              • May 2011
              • 7768

              #21
              Hate on what Rodgers hasn't done yet all you want. That interview isn't even about him be the best. The whole thing is a discussion on what he's learned and what he is continuing to learn about what it means and takes to be a successful NFL quarterback. Comparisons to Brett Farve are irrelevant.
              [REDACTED]

              Comment

              • ram29jackson
                Noob
                • Nov 2008
                • 0

                #22
                Originally posted by bucky
                It wasn't just the number of ints, but also the timeliness of the ints.

                Brett Favre =
                GOAT regular season
                average in the playoffs.

                Bart Starr =
                above average regular season
                Phenomenal in the playoffs.

                Starr > Favre.

                Aaron Rodgers has a chance to be better than Starr.


                LOL at comparisons..they were all Packers, they were all winners, and that is the important thing. GB has cornered the market more than a few times.. Favre, Rodgers, Starr,..they all mean one thing, ;Super Bowls/Championships won !....good night Lynn Dickey, where ever you are ..?


                ... I just kind of wish Biletnikoff had been a Packer....of course he probably wouldnt have gotten as many catches/balls thrown to him...?

                Comment

                • MrBill
                  Billy Brewer Sucks Penis
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 0

                  #23
                  Originally posted by BrntO4Life
                  I was going to post a lengthy statistical analysis proving that Favre's INT numbers are far higher than QBs who played at the same time as him (and after) that would be considered his peers by the untrained eye and thoughtless mind, but I remembered that you're an idiot and cancelled those plans.
                  I'd like to see that lengthy statistical analysis. Favre's interception percentage is actually less than all but 3 Hall of Fame QB's according to the NFL statistics on passing. Every QB on this list is in the HoF.

                  Brett Favre and the Interception Myth

                  QUARTERBACK: INTERCEPTION PCT.

                  Arnie Herber: 9.0 (1,175 attempts, 106 INTs)
                  Bob Waterfield: 7.9% (1,617 attempts, 128 INTs)
                  Sid Luckman: 7.6% (1,744 attempts, 132 INTs)
                  George Blanda: 6.9% (4,007 attempts, 277 INTs)
                  Sammy Baugh: 6.8% (2,995 attempts, 203 INTs)
                  Bobby Layne: 6.6% (3,700 attempts, 243 INTs)
                  Norm Van Brocklin: 6.1% (2,895 attempts, 178 INTs)
                  Joe Namath: 5.8% (3,762 attempts, 220 INTs)
                  Y.A. Tittle: 5.6% (4,395 attempts, 248 INTs)
                  Terry Bradshaw: 5.4% (3,901 attempts, 210 INTs)
                  Otto Graham: 5.1% (2,626 attempts, 135 INTs)
                  Bob Griese: 5.0% (3,429 attempts, 172 INTs)
                  Johnny Unitas: 4.9% (5,186 attempts, 253 INTs)
                  Len Dawson: 4.9% (3,741 attempts, 183 INTs)
                  Bart Starr: 4.4% (3,149 attempts, 138 INTs)
                  Sonny Jurgensen: 4.4% (4,262 attempts, 189 INTs)
                  Dan Fouts: 4.3% (5,604 attempts, 242 INTs)
                  Fran Tarkenton: 4.1% (6,467 attempts, 266 INTs)
                  Roger Staubach: 3.7% (2,958 attempts, 109 INTs)
                  Jim Kelly: 3.7% (4,779 attempts, 175 INTs)
                  Boomer Esiason: 3.5% (5,205 attempts, 184 INTs)
                  Warren Moon: 3.4% (6,823 attempts, 233 INTs)
                  Brett Favre: 3.3% (9,280 attempts, 310 INTs)

                  Furthermore, Favre’s interception percentage isn’t terribly higher than that of these Hall of Famers:

                  John Elway: 3.1 (7,250 attempts, 226 INTs)
                  Dan Marino: 3.0 (8,358 attempts, 252 INTs)
                  Troy Aikman: 3.0 (4,715 attempts, 141 INTs)
                  To me, even these statistics can be read in different ways. Up until a few years ago defensive backs could actually play live football against receivers. QB's today are basically operating in flag football mode. Rodgers has better receivers than Favre post '97 as well to go along with the rule changes favoring the passing game. I think we have 5 QB's in the hunt to break the yardage record this year so even though Rodgers is playing at the top of the league right now, it's easy to see the league is watered down from years past.

                  Comment

                  • bucky
                    #50? WTF?
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 5408

                    #24
                    Originally posted by MrBill
                    I'd like to see that lengthy statistical analysis. Favre's interception percentage is actually less than all but 3 Hall of Fame QB's according to the NFL statistics on passing. Every QB on this list is in the HoF.
                    What's his int % in playoff games? Compared to other HOF QB's in the playoffs? Bet he doesn't even come close to touching Starr on this.

                    Brett is a 1st ballot HOF'er and deserves to be.

                    But Brett is
                    GOAT in the regular season
                    average in the playoffs

                    To me, and most others, playoff games are more important than regular season games.

                    Comment

                    • MvP
                      a member of vsn
                      • Oct 2008
                      • 8227

                      #25
                      Originally posted by bucky

                      Brett is a 1st ballot HOF'er and deserves to be.

                      But Brett is
                      GOAT in the regular season
                      average in the playoffs
                      The same could be said about Peyton Manning.

                      Comment

                      • BrntO4Life
                        My Aunt Ida Smokes.
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 6866

                        #26
                        Originally posted by MrBill
                        I'd like to see that lengthy statistical analysis. Favre's interception percentage is actually less than all but 3 Hall of Fame QB's according to the NFL statistics on passing. Every QB on this list is in the HoF.
                        I'm not interested in how many INTs are thrown per attempt.

                        I simply looked at INTs per full season played (minimum 13 games started) and found that Favre was much worse than any other QB I calculated it with (Marino, Kelly, Elway, Rodgers, Manning, Brady). I could have done it with more, but as I said above, wasting my time arguing with rams29jackson is entirely pointless.

                        Comment

                        • Tengo Juego
                          Posts a lot
                          • Jun 2009
                          • 4289

                          #27
                          Oh, man. You guys really went there.

                          Comment

                          • ram29jackson
                            Noob
                            • Nov 2008
                            • 0

                            #28
                            Originally posted by BrntO4Life
                            I'm not interested in how many INTs are thrown per attempt.

                            I simply looked at INTs per full season played (minimum 13 games started) and found that Favre was much worse than any other QB I calculated it with (Marino, Kelly, Elway, Rodgers, Manning, Brady). I could have done it with more, but as I said above, wasting my time arguing with rams29jackson is entirely pointless.
                            argue about what? I dont deny he threw interceptions at bad times..so what...that doesnt lesson his over all greateness in the history of the NFL..in his twighlight he gave Minnesota a chance to win it all, but alot of team mistakes got in the way, not just his one late bad throw..he has a ton of stats because he was a damn good passer and improviser...Favre threw more interceptions because he threw more passes than most..so what..still, one of the greatest at the QB position in NFL history !! Elway has 2 SB wins, but you can also call him the biggest SB choker in history... ? but its a team game and you cant blame him or Favre entirely for having bad outings in team games...Elway was a great comeback artist, but only when his team wasnt completely inferior to the other team...ah, arm chair football, such a fun timekiller.....:drunk:

                            Comment

                            • MrBill
                              Billy Brewer Sucks Penis
                              • Feb 2009
                              • 0

                              #29
                              Originally posted by bucky
                              What's his int % in playoff games? Compared to other HOF QB's in the playoffs? Bet he doesn't even come close to touching Starr on this.

                              Brett is a 1st ballot HOF'er and deserves to be.

                              But Brett is
                              GOAT in the regular season
                              average in the playoffs

                              To me, and most others, playoff games are more important than regular season games.
                              Well of course Favre doesn't come close to Starr in playoff records. Starr has 15 TD's to 3 INT's and a 104.8 rating with a 9-1 W/L and 2-0 in the Super Bowl (5-1 conference championships). Favre has 44 TD's to 30 INT's and a 86.5 QB rating with a 13-11 W/L and 1-1 in the Super Bowl.

                              Starr clearly gets the nod based on the record but also gets the caveat of playing with a HOF coach, RB, OL and a number 1 ranked defense for 5 of his championships. Favre had Reggie White for a few years.

                              Comment

                              • MrBill
                                Billy Brewer Sucks Penis
                                • Feb 2009
                                • 0

                                #30
                                Originally posted by BrntO4Life
                                I'm not interested in how many INTs are thrown per attempt.
                                Actually there is no other way to look at the raw data. If a QB has 8,000 attempts and 300 INT's he is obviously better than a QB with 4,000 attempts and 250 INT's.

                                Originally posted by BrntO4Life
                                I simply looked at INTs per full season played (minimum 13 games started) and found that Favre was much worse than any other QB I calculated it with (Marino, Kelly, Elway, Rodgers, Manning, Brady).

                                Comment

                                Working...