Could LSU lose to Alabama in the National Championship and still be #1?

[FirstTimer]

I understand where you guys are coming from..

Reality.

you guys are of the thought that Alabama is currently undeserving

Nothing to do with it.

But my point is that LSU could still be considered more deserving even if they lose...so therefore people could still vote LSU.

We never said otherwise or disagreed that they "could"..We said they wouldn't vote them NC...and if the AP Poll somehow did it would be laughed at.

[ram29jackson]

point blank- Bama has no business being in this game in the first place..this is the ultimate in a fixed match up to amuse people with money and power

[Senser81]

I dont know why this stupid comparison keeps coming up, but college basketball doesnt crown its champion with polls.

I didn't say "polls". I said people. It was in response to your argument that "people" could still say LSU is #1.

[ZoneBlitz]

I didn't say "polls". I said people. It was in response to your argument that "people" could still say LSU is #1.

Irrelevant comparion, no other sport crowns its champ this way. CFB is the only sport that has difference of opinion on who the champion should be.

Im simply saying some people could realistically vote LSU over Bama even if they lose a playoff game.

FT is slowly coming around, i just need him to agree that its more possible than 0.0000000000001%

[Senser81]

Irrelevant comparion, no other sport crowns its champ this way. CFB is the only sport that has difference of opinion on who the champion should be.

Im simply saying some people could realistically vote LSU over Bama even if they lose a playoff game.

No one is disagreeing with that being a possibility. I think the disagreement is that you seem to be attaching some sort of relevance to that possibility. What is your point?

CFB is also the only sport that doesn't have a playoff system. COINCIDENCE?

Your logic is incredibly backwards. Henry Ford invents the automobile, but you say we shouldn't produce automobiles "because nobody knows how to drive them".

[FirstTimer]

FT is slowly coming around, i just need him to agree that its more possible than 0.0000000000001%

WTF do you mean "slowly coming around".

I never said it was impossible.

Read the thread again from the start retard.

[FirstTimer]

No one is disagreeing with that being a possibility. I think the disagreement is that you seem to be attaching some sort of relevance to that possibility. What is your point?

.

Exactly. I'm sure some retard somewhere might vote LSU over Bama after a playoff loss NCG if the AP poll kept existing with the playoff set up or if it wasn't absorbed into the playoff set up itself.

Then again a massive number more people would vote for Bama because it make sense basedon the way people think about and view playoffs. It's like the one or two writers voting for Boise each year they went undefeated. Sure it happened...but it didn't mean anything or change anything.

[ZoneBlitz]

No one is disagreeing with that being a possibility. I think the disagreement is that you seem to be attaching some sort of relevance to that possibility. What is your point?

That its a realistic possibility. That was my only point. So we agree then?

[FirstTimer]

That its a realistic possibility

Not in any real meaningful or relevant way.

Tard

[Senser81]

That its a realistic possibility. That was my only point. So we agree then?

What is meant by "realistic possibility"? And thats not really a "point", its an observation.

I could say that its a realistic possibility that Ohio State doesn't sniff a national title game if a playoff system is developed...but is that really a "point"?

I'm not disputing what you say, I'm asking you "why are you saying this?"

[ZoneBlitz]

Not in any real meaningful or relevant way.

Tard

Well you're wrong.

Fag.

[ZoneBlitz]

What is meant by "realistic possibility"? And thats not really a "point", its an observation.

I could say that its a realistic possibility that Ohio State doesn't sniff a national title game if a playoff system is developed...but is that really a "point"?

I'm not disputing what you say, I'm asking you "why are you saying this?"

Because i was making an observation, point, whatever you wanna call it.

You guys been strongly disputing it for 3 pages.

[kmanharris]

As FT and Sensor have said 56 times, (that's an exaggeration, don't take it literally) sure people could still say LSU>Bama even if Bama beat LSU in the NCCG after a playoff, but, those people would be in the minority and it wouldn't change a thing.

I'll break it down further and space it out in both scenarios for you:

Scenario 1
100 voters (again, made up number)
Bama>LSU with no playoff
51 vote LSU #1
49 vote Bama #1

Scenario 2
100 voters
Bama>LSU with a playoff
98 vote Bama #1
2 vote LSU #1

Do you see the difference? Majority of people voted LSU #1 in the scenario with no playoff, so obviously it makes a difference because of the subjectivity of how Bama got into the game. The 2 people who voted for LSU in scenario 2 don't make a fucking difference because there is no subjectivity because it was all decided on the field.

[FirstTimer]

Well you're wrong.

Fag.

My poll proves otherwise.

You guys been strongly disputing it for 3 pages.

No, we have not been.

[ZoneBlitz]

As FT and Sensor have said 56 times, (that's an exaggeration, don't take it literally) sure people could still say LSU>Bama even if Bama beat LSU in the NCCG after a playoff, but, those people would be in the minority and it wouldn't change a thing.

I'll break it down further and space it out in both scenarios for you:

Scenario 1
100 voters (again, made up number)
Bama>LSU with no playoff
51 vote LSU #1
49 vote Bama #1

Scenario 2
100 voters
Bama>LSU with a playoff
98 vote Bama #1
2 vote LSU #1

Do you see the difference? Majority of people voted LSU #1 in the scenario with no playoff, so obviously it makes a difference because of the subjectivity of how Bama got into the game. The 2 people who voted for LSU in scenario 2 don't make a fucking difference because there is no subjectivity because it was all decided on the field.

Bullshit. Thats just your opinion.

Many people happen to believe Bama was deserving of the #2 spot, so they wouldnt need them to win a playoff game for them to be "deserving"