Which sequel will tonight's game more closely resemble?

[ZoneBlitz]

Zone, I have to believe it has less to do with a rematch and moreso people's desire to boycot a bowl system that preaches that the regular season matters. People just used the rematch argument to further justify why the BCS system sucks. Had LSU and Alabama had a rematch through a playoff system people wouldn't have cared.

Good point.

I know you were one of the few here who didnt have a problem with a rematch, so i think you can see where im coming from.

I thought the rematch argument was stupid.

[Rudi]

FT, this is useless to try and explain to Zone. Its like trying to teach a retard to hump a doorknob.

[FirstTimer]

Pats vs Giants Super Bowl

LSU vs Alabama NCG

Which one of these is not like the other?

[shag773]

Pats vs Giants Super Bowl

LSU vs Alabama NCG

Which one of these is not like the other?

I smell a poll....

[Houston]

For a Ravens/49ers rematch I'm thinking...





Before the battle John Harbaugh visits with the previously defeated Jim just as Xavier visited Magneto in prison. Both knowing that no matter how it ends, they'll remain brothers after. Also it'll be better then the original.

[FirstTimer]

I smell a poll....

Nah. Zone wouldn't know how to read it anyways.

[ZoneBlitz]

FT you continue to troll and tactically stray away from my point.

I know that the SB matchup would have been earned on the field. We all get it, thanks.

But people were completely against a rematch in CFB, yet they are perfectly fine with it in the Super Bowl.

It has nothing to do with one matchup being "earned" and the other one not. Im simply talking about the issues with a rematch, period.

[FirstTimer]

FT you continue to troll and tactically stray away from my point.

I'm not trolling.

We are all saying teh same thing.and have been for months now.

Yawn.

I know that the SB matchup would have been earned on the field

Ok. End.

[FirstTimer]

It still amazes me that ZB can "understand" that the Super Bowl is determined by an on the field playoff yet he has trouble realizing why people do not have an issue with a rematch determined by said playoff in contrast with a rematch that was force fed to them by polls and a computer.

[ZoneBlitz]

It still amazes me that ZB can "understand" that the Super Bowl is determined by an on the field playoff yet he has trouble realizing why people do not have an issue with a rematch determined by said playoff in contrast with a rematch that was force fed to them by polls and a computer.

It still amazes me how you continue to say bullshit like this to misinterpret my point.

What im saying has ZERO to do with a playoff or BCS. Im talking about people hating rematches in CFB, and having no problem with them in NFL.

REMATCHES...not how they happened, but just them happening, period.

Stop trolling.

[Sharkweather]

It has nothing to do with one matchup being "earned" and the other one not.

Yes, it does. That is the whole damn point. That is why 22 people are ok with Bal/SF and why the consensus on this forum was the LSU/Alabama rematch was poop.

[FirstTimer]

What im saying has ZERO to do with a playoff or BCS.

:obama:

Wrong.

[FirstTimer]

Forced rematches=bad.

Rematches as a result of on the field play in a playoff=Fine.

[NAHSTE]

Uh, its not unavoidable. 3 of the 4 SB matchups are not rematches.
.

You can't be this stupid. I didn't say they were inevitable, just that whatever match up a playoff system gives you is UNAVOIDABLE, be it a rematch or otherwise.

[ZoneBlitz]

You can't be this stupid. I didn't say they were inevitable, just that whatever match up a playoff system gives you is UNAVOIDABLE, be it a rematch or otherwise.

I know that.

But the rematch is the leading vote getter, among all the possible matchups.

Goes against your whole "people strive to avoid a rematch" theory.