Look at what Miami has been doing this year.
What, running a college formation? So you agree that the diversity is exciting?
I disagree. College OT doesn't include kickoffs which a big part of the game. The one team can possibly not get a go at it at all point is moot when statistics show starting with the ball really isn't as much of an advantage as one might think. In fact it can be a disadvantage when field position is concerned.
It's not so much getting a chance with the ball as it is excitement. One team scores, now you HAVE to score or it's done. I feel like it's just that much more dramatic and intense in college, not to say the NFL is not. College is just more. Not to mention it's like a mini-game. It's just more fun.
the same reason you love it is the same reason i hate it. College can be too sloppy to watch.
Matter of opinion. Agree to disagree.
To say all those players are out there only for the love of the game is ridiculous. No matter what you or they say, it's in the back of their mind that if they play well enough they can make money from it. And to say Pros don't love the game is crazy as well. Football is a 24/7, year round job. They wouldn't be able to make it through that without a love for the game.
I'll give you this one too, although I did say the players have 100% incentive to play great football, so playing well to make money later is incentive. Pros get guaranteed money, so what's their incentive? A great example is WRs not blocking down field, or DEs not running the play down from the backside. Just the little things that most people don't normally care about I notice.
Rivalries have gone out the window a bit over the last few years. Part of that has been the NFL's attempt to clean up it's image with the hard stance on taunting and tougher penalties on illegal contact. However that's to be expected considering the rise of injuries over the last few years. Still though, there are some games in the NFL that produce on-field intensity that no college game can match. Pittsburgh vs Jacksonville is a prime example. Most of the college intensity is by the fans and not the players as it is. If you had 100,000+ players at a NFL game, it'd be the same if not more.
Some of the best football games I've ever seen were at the college level. Last second heroics, upsets, comebacks, slugfests and shootouts, college football has it all, sometimes on a weekly basis. Look at last week for example; Kentucky and Buffalo both had insane rallies in the final seconds to beat Arkansas and Army respectively; TCU, Maryland, Virginia, Boston College and Arizona were all unranked and knocked out a ranked opponent, the highest being #9 BYU; Florida A&M and Southern University combined for 101 points in a 52-49 final, and don't even get me started on Tulsa/UTEP last week; Rutgers and Connecticut didn't score a touchdown until the final quarter, in a 12-10 drag-em-out dog fight.
So whatever your definition of "intensity" is, college has it every single week. And you can't tell me Texas/Oklahoma a few weeks ago wasn't an intense game, unless you didn't watch it.
Probably because other than the top 25 you don't watch many games. Outside of the ranked teams, the games can be pretty dull and irritating. The lack of parity and any sort of a decent post season hurt college football. It'll never be close until college adopts a post season.
The lack of parity is a tough arguement. Obviously the worst and the best team are light-years apart, but watching #1USC lose to Oregon State can pretty much negate the fact that certain teams over-power others. The playoffs are great, but the BCS basically makes every regular season game a playoff game. You really can't afford to lose if you want to play for a National Championship.