For years now, I've been talking about the regional bias in the Heisman Trophy balloting. If you haven't read it yet, dig into the item I wrote in 2003 about the structural regional bias that exists.
It's not as simple as East Coast voters not staying up late to watch evening games in the Pacific timezone. It's not as simple as Southern voters thinking the Pac-10 is soft. There's always been - and always will be - a certain amount of regional favoritism in the voting; whether deliberate or accidental.
Rather, the Heisman Trust has simply shortchanged the West in terms of the number of votes. Here's an easy and crystal clear example. This year, we learned that the state of Alabama has 24 media voters. Last year, I learned that Oregon (where I live) has 10 media voters.
Here's the rub: According to the 2007 Census estimate, Alabama has 4.58 million residents. Oregon has 3.69 million residents.
So, Alabama has one Heisman voter for every 191,000 people. Oregon has one voter for every 369,000 people. Alabama is 1.25 times the size of Oregon, but has 2.4 times as many votes.
That, in a nutshell, is structural regional bias. And it should be fixed.