But since their is no "defined" resume criteria for mid-majors, much of what is decided is based on speculation and how "good" a team is. And, IMO, they should probably seed the teams based on how they will do in the tournament. Its amazing to me that UNC and Butler had nearly identical seasons in that they struggled early in the year, did well late in the year, and ended up winning their conference. Butler made the title game last year, and all they got was an EIGHT seed this year? While UNC got a #2 seed?? Its somewhat surprising that Butler made the Final Four, but not all that surprising. Its just that they were seeded so low....Villanova was terrible at the end of the year and they were a NINE seed!