Franchise Q&A Part 3

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kia Kaha
    52Ray_Lewis
    • Dec 2008
    • 1075

    #16
    and im dissapointed VSN lol, Adem answers all these question about franchise mode and only one other besides me thank him for it.

    Comment

    • Maestro
      ♫Just Like Music♫
      • Nov 2008
      • 3557

      #17
      I wonder if the logic while the cpu is drafting has been fixed. Even on last years game i saw the Vikings picking RB's in the first round.

      Comment

      • Sven Draconian
        Not a Scandanavian
        • Feb 2009
        • 1319

        #18
        Originally posted by Sportsbuck
        Spoiler tags need to be mandatory when discussing draftees or anything close once the game drops.
        Yea but you know how that will work. Everybody is cautious the first month, but then the info starts popping up in non-related threads.

        For example, in Head Coach, everyone knows Jack English is a super stud QB even if you never saw that class in the game. There were several others I knew at the time (and would know on sight of the name), and I was really trying to avoid knowing that info. It just comes out during non-related threads.

        The only way to not learn the draft classes is to avoid the forums as much as possible. Avoid reading anybodies franchise (which stinks for those of us who read them). Avoid reading any franchise related topics (Such as, how's your franchise progress). You also need to avoid anything about your best player, check out this player, stat lines ect ect.

        It's not the end of the world, but it is pointless to have it this way.

        Comment

        • killgod
          OHHHH WHEN THE REDSSSSS
          • Oct 2008
          • 4714

          #19
          Originally posted by Maestro
          I wonder if the logic while the cpu is drafting has been fixed. Even on last years game i saw the Vikings picking RB's in the first round.
          They've mentioned this was fixed.

          Comment

          • adembroski
            All-Inclusive!
            • Feb 2009
            • 1815

            #20
            Just to throw this out there... most CPU teams for some reason only carry 2 QBs. Kinda weird.
            S.P.Q.A.

            Comment

            • j.hen
              Self Care
              • Oct 2008
              • 10058

              #21
              I really hope they fix the glitch with editing players. Its annoying editing a guy's equipment or number or position and having their draft info wiped clean.

              Comment

              • Rayman
                Spic 'n Spanish
                • Feb 2009
                • 4626

                #22
                Originally posted by adembroski
                I think his point is that progression is based on performance, and thus lesser backups wont progress, which isn't entirely true.

                As long as they play, they'll progress... you just aren't going to get a guy from a 70 to an elite level with limited playing time. The vast majority of young players progress some at least.
                But if it's at a position that doesn't play a lot, like backup QB or someone along the line, I'm screwed if I ever want him to progress without the starter getting hurt. Is that what we're seeing?

                And I don't need guys to be elite, but I need them to be servicable, especially if the ratings mean as much as these guys say they do now.
                Last edited by Rayman; 06-18-2009, 05:08 PM.



                Comment

                • Raidersabc123
                  Wakka Wakka
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 5061

                  #23
                  Originally posted by J.Hen
                  I really hope they fix the glitch with editing players. Its annoying editing a guy's equipment or number or position and having their draft info wiped clean.
                  Hell ya I hate when that happeneds
                  THe MaDDeN GoD

                  Comment

                  Working...