Medal of Honor: Warfighter

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CCBrink
    Awkward Swag
    • May 2009
    • 4261

    Hardcore mode was the worst. Was pretty hilarious hearing everyone's reactions though. After we got into a normal match, it was much better.

    Aside from the abuse of flashbangs, I had a lot of fun with the FOOT crew last night.

    P.S. They really should nerf the flashbangs a little



    Comment

    • Twigg4075
      Kindergarten Cop
      • Feb 2009
      • 20056

      Originally posted by CCBrink
      Hardcore mode was the worst. Was pretty hilarious hearing everyone's reactions though. After we got into a normal match, it was much better.

      Aside from the abuse of flashbangs, I had a lot of fun with the FOOT crew last night.

      P.S. They really should nerf the flashbangs a little
      Yeah, my only real complaints about mp are the flashbangs and that glitched spawn issue we had on that one map, which according to the guys on the other team only occurs on that map. I'm sure it will be fixed soon. If you were drinking like I was it was more comical than anything. I'm enjoying the mp so far. It doesn't do anything crazy new but I do like the combination of CoD and Battlefield, like others have said. It seems to have almost the pace of a CoD but much more team oriented. The voice chat was weird too. When it was just Swarley and I and we were using the Fireteam chat it was perfectly fine. Then when Brink and Dizzle jopined we switched to Team chat and it was working great for several matches. Then we backed out to try a different mode and when we went back in using Team chat I could only communicate with Swarley but Swarley could hear Dizzle and I. Weird.

      As for the campaign, I've only played the first few levels but it definitely seems like a CoD campaign so far, which isn't a bad thing IMO. The campaigns are one of the things I actually like about the CoD games. As long as it isn't four hours long I'll be happy.

      Comment

      • jms493
        Junior Member
        • Feb 2009
        • 11248

        Originally posted by Twigg4075
        Yeah, my only real complaints about mp are the flashbangs and that glitched spawn issue we had on that one map, which according to the guys on the other team only occurs on that map. I'm sure it will be fixed soon. If you were drinking like I was it was more comical than anything. I'm enjoying the mp so far. It doesn't do anything crazy new but I do like the combination of CoD and Battlefield, like others have said. It seems to have almost the pace of a CoD but much more team oriented. The voice chat was weird too. When it was just Swarley and I and we were using the Fireteam chat it was perfectly fine. Then when Brink and Dizzle jopined we switched to Team chat and it was working great for several matches. Then we backed out to try a different mode and when we went back in using Team chat I could only communicate with Swarley but Swarley could hear Dizzle and I. Weird.

        As for the campaign, I've only played the first few levels but it definitely seems like a CoD campaign so far, which isn't a bad thing IMO. The campaigns are one of the things I actually like about the CoD games. As long as it isn't four hours long I'll be happy.
        watching Brad S play it on the Quick Look. He got through a 1/3 of the game in about 1.5 hour.

        Comment

        • JayDizzle
          Let's Go All The Way...
          • Nov 2008
          • 14215

          Watch this:



          Sign in with your Origin info after.

          Get free gun camo.

          It's dumb but so were the free set of tags you got for watching the Navy Seals movie trailer a while back.

          Comment

          • JayDizzle
            Let's Go All The Way...
            • Nov 2008
            • 14215



            Ouch.

            IGN gave it a 4.

            And I'm starting to feel bad that Twigg, Brink and possibly Swarley might have wasted their money on this.

            Comment

            • Swarley
              A Special Kind of Cat
              • Jul 2010
              • 11213

              Originally posted by JayDizzle
              http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/10/...fighter-review

              Ouch.

              IGN gave it a 4.

              And I'm starting to feel bad that Twigg, Brink and possibly Swarley might have wasted their money on this.
              I'm having fun, so is Twigg. Fuck what they say.

              Is it anywhere near the best game ever? Definitely not. If someone else who doesn't buy a bazillion games every years was thinking about it, I'd definitely tell them to just do with BF3 instead.

              Comment

              • Maynard
                stupid ass titles
                • Feb 2009
                • 17876

                gamespot 6
                Medal of Honor: Warfighter doesn't merge its cliched parts into a satisfying whole, making it just another middle-of-the-road military shooter.


                wow, a 49 on metacritic for the 360 version..includes ign, destructiod and joysticks

                Comment

                • JayDizzle
                  Let's Go All The Way...
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 14215

                  Originally posted by Swarley
                  I'm having fun, so is Twigg. Fuck what they say.

                  Is it anywhere near the best game ever? Definitely not. If someone else who doesn't buy a bazillion games every years was thinking about it, I'd definitely tell them to just do with BF3 instead.
                  But is the experience that you can get from any game as long as you got your buds playing with you?

                  Or is it from what you get from this particular game?

                  Comment

                  • Swarley
                    A Special Kind of Cat
                    • Jul 2010
                    • 11213

                    Originally posted by JayDizzle
                    But is the experience that you can get from any game as long as you got your buds playing with you?

                    Or is it from what you get from this particular game?
                    I like the pace of the play. It's nice to have the faster style like COD, but without all of their retarded shit. However, I haven't played BF3 Close Quarters, but I'm sure that would be just as good of an option.

                    Comment

                    • JayDizzle
                      Let's Go All The Way...
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 14215

                      Originally posted by Swarley
                      I like the pace of the play. It's nice to have the faster style like COD, but without all of their retarded shit. However, I haven't played BF3 Close Quarters, but I'm sure that would be just as good of an option.
                      Think smaller maps, shorter Domination maps with flag capture circles the size of a pin's head AND C4 spam out the ass.

                      Gun Game... err, Master's fun though if you have a few minutes.

                      Comment

                      • Swarley
                        A Special Kind of Cat
                        • Jul 2010
                        • 11213

                        Of course, voice chat broken tonight. Now I'm getting angry.

                        Comment

                        • Price
                          Lets Tessellate
                          • Oct 2012
                          • 1269

                          Originally posted by Swarley
                          Of course, voice chat broken tonight. Now I'm getting angry.
                          Just like BF3 at launch...

                          Comment

                          • Maynard
                            stupid ass titles
                            • Feb 2009
                            • 17876

                            why would you guys buy a game with no demo and no early release. the no demo is ok if its an established franchise or reputable developer. but this had a busted beta and no demo. but an absolute no fucking way red flag is when the company holds back early releases so nobody can review it in advance. thats equal to them saying...hey, my game sucks but we want your money

                            no offense guys, but with people like you why do developers have to care about making good games? very disappointing

                            Comment

                            • Twigg4075
                              Kindergarten Cop
                              • Feb 2009
                              • 20056

                              I like the game quite a bit.

                              If they get the voice chat stuff fixed I'll be pleased as punch.

                              IGN gave it a 4? They must be high.

                              Comment

                              • Handleit_44
                                Posts a lot
                                • Jun 2009
                                • 3330

                                Just another game that didn't fork over enough money to IGN.


                                Simple as that, folks.

                                Comment

                                Working...