NEW LIVE ACTION BATMAN MOVIE IN 2015

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Goober
    Needs a hobby
    • Feb 2009
    • 12271

    Comment

    • Villain
      [REDACTED]
      • May 2011
      • 7768

      I feel like I've already watched the whole movie after all the shit I've seen in this thread.
      [REDACTED]

      Comment

      • Golden Taters
        RIP West
        • Jul 2009
        • 6640

        Dale Earnhardt Jr.

        Comment

        • Goober
          Needs a hobby
          • Feb 2009
          • 12271

          New trailer!



          "Mr. Wayne"

          Comment

          • Goober
            Needs a hobby
            • Feb 2009
            • 12271

            Comment

            • Goober
              Needs a hobby
              • Feb 2009
              • 12271

              Awesome:

              Comment

              • KINGOFOOTBALL
                Junior Member
                • Feb 2009
                • 10343

                Im still bothered that Tom Hardy is not even close to being a big guy. Saw him in two movies recently and that part is going to bother me regardless of how great his acting is. Unless theres some comic story line wheres hes a 205lb lhw Im pre-dissapointed.
                Best reason to have a license.

                Comment

                • Goober
                  Needs a hobby
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 12271

                  Originally posted by KINGOFOOTBALL
                  Im still bothered that Tom Hardy is not even close to being a big guy. Saw him in two movies recently and that part is going to bother me regardless of how great his acting is. Unless theres some comic story line wheres hes a 205lb lhw Im pre-dissapointed.
                  Did the joker not being perma-white ruin it for you too?

                  Comment

                  • Cornelius
                    3rd place is you're fired
                    • Oct 2010
                    • 2377

                    Originally posted by KINGOFOOTBALL
                    Im still bothered that Tom Hardy is not even close to being a big guy. Saw him in two movies recently and that part is going to bother me regardless of how great his acting is. Unless theres some comic story line wheres hes a 205lb lhw Im pre-dissapointed.
                    Kinda strange coming from you because you liked XMen 3 and they fucked the characters up in that, particularly Juggernaut.

                    Comment

                    • KINGOFOOTBALL
                      Junior Member
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 10343

                      Originally posted by Goobyslayer
                      Did the joker not being perma-white ruin it for you too?

                      Almost did. Same as Hugh jackmans height almost ruined Xmen1. But once the actors persona took over I was less bothered. Banes size was used so many times to portray his advantage over Batman. Its like having Forrest Griffin playing Brock Lesnar. That pic is not what I would have expected.
                      Originally posted by Cornelius
                      Kinda strange coming from you because you liked XMen 3 and they fucked the characters up in that, particularly Juggernaut.
                      I finally watched it a second time. Only 2 scenes did I thoroughly enjoy. The rest were far inferior to parts 1-2. I still like it but its a clear drop off .Too many characters got shitty treatment. Juggernaut included. Not having him brawl with colassus was an ignorant and terrible decision. Definitely the least good of the xmen movies.(wolverine origins pretty close)
                      Best reason to have a license.

                      Comment

                      • Cornelius
                        3rd place is you're fired
                        • Oct 2010
                        • 2377



                        Not exactly 6'8, 350, then again Nolan can't have his "realistic" superhero movie with a dude like that.

                        Comment

                        • LiquidLarry2GhostWF
                          Highwayman
                          • Feb 2009
                          • 15429

                          Bane's character is more real-to-life obviously...Hardy is swole...but he's not jacked to the gills swole...I mean, Hardy is a fantastic actor...would you rather substitute that amazing ability to act for Dave Batista to be your Bane?

                          It is obvious that this Bane focuses a bit more on his intelligence (especially in regards to strategy and tactics), his affiliation with Ra's al Ghul, his ability to find out Batman's identity, somehow maim or subdue Batman physically, potential use of venom (although, the venom doesn't make him look like the Rock on a cycle)...

                          There is so many aspects of Hardy's character that keeps the Bane character "at home" but you focus on the simple fact that he's not cartoony large...seems silly.

                          Was Heath Ledger's Joker less or more impressive because his character wasn't exactly ripped from the pages from the comics? If Nolan's Batman's have taught you anything, it should be that making these characters your own in some way is best for business. For Ledger...what good would it have been to be Joker from the early comics, or Caesar Romero, or the 80's Joker, or god forbid Jack's Joker, or even Mark Hamil's Joker from the animated series...all of those Joker characters are simply their own version of the Joker and Heath Ledger did his own and that is what made his rendition of the character so great. Now, Bane isn't as iconic, nor has the track record of amazing that the Joker character does...but...its looking pretty damn good...I mean, would you rather have him look like this?

                           

                          Comment

                          • Cornelius
                            3rd place is you're fired
                            • Oct 2010
                            • 2377

                            Originally posted by LiquidLarry2GhostWF
                            Bane's character is more real-to-life obviously...Hardy is swole...but he's not jacked to the gills swole...I mean, Hardy is a fantastic actor...would you rather substitute that amazing ability to act for Dave Batista to be your Bane?

                            It is obvious that this Bane focuses a bit more on his intelligence (especially in regards to strategy and tactics), his affiliation with Ra's al Ghul, his ability to find out Batman's identity, somehow maim or subdue Batman physically, potential use of venom (although, the venom doesn't make him look like the Rock on a cycle)...

                            There is so many aspects of Hardy's character that keeps the Bane character "at home" but you focus on the simple fact that he's not cartoony large...seems silly.

                            Was Heath Ledger's Joker less or more impressive because his character wasn't exactly ripped from the pages from the comics? If Nolan's Batman's have taught you anything, it should be that making these characters your own in some way is best for business. For Ledger...what good would it have been to be Joker from the early comics, or Caesar Romero, or the 80's Joker, or god forbid Jack's Joker, or even Mark Hamil's Joker from the animated series...all of those Joker characters are simply their own version of the Joker and Heath Ledger did his own and that is what made his rendition of the character so great. Now, Bane isn't as iconic, nor has the track record of amazing that the Joker character does...but...its looking pretty damn good...I mean, would you rather have him look like this?

                             
                            Yes, then he might also be one of W2B's top 100 wrestlers. Oh, and Bat nipples please........kthx

                            Comment

                            • Matt
                              No longer a noob
                              • Jun 2012
                              • 1565

                              The Dark Knight Rises features an hour’s worth of action sequences and set pieces shot in IMAX.

                              Comment

                              • Golden Taters
                                RIP West
                                • Jul 2009
                                • 6640

                                Comment

                                Working...