Smoltz wants to start.
ATL, sign Smoltz already
Collapse
X
-
John Smoltz doesn't need to earn a starting role in spring training IMO, and I think he has too much pride to put himself in that position. -
Fuck that, he couldn't go very long last season without someone tearing him up. I would not want him back in the bullpen because then he would have to pitch on the regular instead of one out of five days.Comment
-
Originally posted by DontTouchThatOnly reason why I recommend doing this is because ATL is sitting on some money that they'll probably never use.Comment
-
did you completely miss Goblin's point?
Save the money, deal away the plethora of pitching prospects that you do have for a bat at the deadline and have the money to pay him so contracts are never an issue.Comment
-
LOL at this guy forgetting that Smoltz was awful last year. The whole veteran's tour with Glavine and Smoltz was a bad bad decision the first time around. Dude got lit up in Atlanta, lit up in Boston, and had a decent 2 months in St. Louis.
Let another team waste the 2.5 million to find out what we already paid to find out last year.Comment
-
tipped pitches or not he was still going to get rocked. His splitter wasn't as effective and his fastball was not located well and didn't have any zip.Comment
-
Originally posted by DontTouchThatYeah, let's pull another Teixeira trade. Maybe we can give away Freeman this time.Comment
-
Originally posted by DontTouchThatDude was tipping his pitches in Boston. Ya'll are crazy if you don't think Smoltz could be a solid #5 in the NL. If Brad Penny can succeed, Smoltz should have no problem.
I love John Smoltz for what he was for the Braves, a leader, a grinder, a FUCKING SOLDIER! (no Kellen) but he's garbo now and we already have 5 legit starters my brotha.Comment
-
Braves already have 5 solid starters in Jurrjens, Hudson, Hanson, Lowe, and Kawakami. I don't think Smoltz would provide an upgrade over any one of them and I don't think there is any way that Smoltz would sign a deal with the Braves unless he was guaranteed a rotation spot. Braves are better off trying to sign another bat than adding a washed up pitcher.Comment
-
Originally posted by DontTouchThatLowe and Kawakami were far from solid in '09. Only thing positive about Kawakami was his 2nd half performance and Jurrjens needs to lower his WHIP down considerably or else he's going to start getting tagged. Smoltz would be a great mentor to the younger pitchers (Hanson, Jurrjens) too so I don't think it's that bad of an idea.Comment
-
LOL at this guy forgetting that Smoltz was awful last year. The whole veteran's tour with Glavine and Smoltz was a bad bad decision the first time around. Dude got lit up in Atlanta, lit up in Boston, and had a decent 2 months in St. Louis.
Let another team waste the 2.5 million to find out what we already paid to find out last year.Comment
Comment