Trevor Hoffman Retires

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • FedEx227
    Delivers
    • Mar 2009
    • 10454

    #16
    WAR also favors Hoffman over Fingers and puts him slightly below Sutter. For the record, Fingers is one of the worst in the HOF in regards to WAR:

    Fingers: 1.4 WAR/year, 24.4 career
    Hoffman: 1.7 WAR/year, 30.7 career
    Sutter: 2.0 WAR/year, 25.0 career
    VoicesofWrestling.com

    Comment

    • Senser81
      VSN Poster of the Year
      • Feb 2009
      • 12804

      #17
      Originally posted by FedEx227
      WAR also favors Hoffman over Fingers and puts him slightly below Sutter. For the record, Fingers is one of the worst in the HOF in regards to WAR:

      Fingers: 1.4 WAR/year, 24.4 career
      Hoffman: 1.7 WAR/year, 30.7 career
      Sutter: 2.0 WAR/year, 25.0 career
      But how accurate is WAR when you are using it on guys who pitch 65 innings a year?

      Comment

      • FedEx227
        Delivers
        • Mar 2009
        • 10454

        #18
        It's relative to other closers in baseball so it's fairly accurate unless Hoffman was the only closer/reliever in baseball throwing 65 innings while others were throwing 120.
        VoicesofWrestling.com

        Comment

        • Senser81
          VSN Poster of the Year
          • Feb 2009
          • 12804

          #19
          Originally posted by FedEx227
          It's relative to other closers in baseball so it's fairly accurate unless Hoffman was the only closer/reliever in baseball throwing 65 innings while others were throwing 120.
          One, such a small sample size (65 innings) would lead to greater variations of relativity, no?

          Two, your statement is ironic since Sutter and Fingers were the only closers throwing 120 innings while most other relievers were only throwing 65 innings.

          Comment

          • FedEx227
            Delivers
            • Mar 2009
            • 10454

            #20
            Originally posted by Senser81
            One, such a small sample size (65 innings) would lead to greater variations of relativity, no?
            No doubt, but it's relative to other closers of the same year. So everyone is on a relatively small sample size. It's the nature of closers in this era. I see what you're saying but I still think his numbers hold up despite the low IP.
            VoicesofWrestling.com

            Comment

            • Warner2BruceTD
              2011 Poster Of The Year
              • Mar 2009
              • 26142

              #21
              Originally posted by FedEx227
              It's relative to other closers in baseball so it's fairly accurate unless Hoffman was the only closer/reliever in baseball throwing 65 innings while others were throwing 120.
              But what defines "closer"? Does the calculation make a disticntion between closers/relievers/longmen/spot starters/etc?

              I've always been skepical of certain metric stats when applied to specialists.

              Comment

              • FedEx227
                Delivers
                • Mar 2009
                • 10454

                #22
                That I can't really tell you with 100% certainty... here's an article about how closers' numbers are calculated but still doesn't address exactly what defines a "closer".

                VoicesofWrestling.com

                Comment

                • PepperNY
                  Best in the World
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 904

                  #23
                  bout time Hoffman retired. I dont see him getting in the HOF until someone like Lee Smith gets in.

                  Comment

                  Working...