Hmmm... Blue Jays cheating?
Collapse
X
-
LOL @ this nonsense.
-Unidentified players reporting this.
-First brought up before Bautista started his tear.
-We're still a .500 club.
-We've been no hit at home this season.
-Teams still mix up their calls anyways, rendering this not even possible.
Shouldn't Hill still be smacking HR's like he did a couple years ago?
Why was Vernon Wells so bad?
But only the Blue Jays, and not their opponents, got a home run boost in Toronto. When the Jays were on the road in 2010, they hit home runs in 4 percent of plate appearances in which they made contact, compared with an AL average of 3.6 percent. At Rogers, their home run on contact rate soared to 5.4 percent, which is a home-field advantage seven times the magnitude teams typically enjoy.
Since when is a team being better at home than on the road newsworthy?
Also LOL @ Yankees texting each other during games. -
-
Since when is a team being better at home than on the road newsworthy?
It's a strong allegation, for sure. Not sure if I believe it or not, but it's a very interesting allegation indeed.Comment
-
That's not the newsworthy part of this report. That's data that supports the theory that is brought forth in the report. The newsworthy part is that opposing players are alleging that they caught the Blue Jays cheating red handed, confronted Bautista about it, and then the Blue Jays stopped cheating via that method.
It's a strong allegation, for sure.
If we "stopped cheating" why does Bautista still lead the MLB in HR's now? Why are more of his HR's on the fuckin ROAD? He was 2nd on HR's on the road last year?
Why are we 6th in total HR's as a team if we "stopped" ?
We hit 35 HR's more home than away in 2010, how many teams hit 20-30 more home than away.............ALMOST ALL OF THEM!Comment
-
That's not the newsworthy part of this report. That's data that supports the theory that is brought forth in the report. The newsworthy part is that (unnamed, yes) opposing players are alleging that they caught the Blue Jays cheating red handed, confronted Bautista about it, and then the Blue Jays stopped cheating via that method.
It's a strong allegation, for sure. Not sure if I believe it or not, but it's a very interesting allegation indeed.
Those numbers are completely out of synch, and when combined with the rest of the suspicious allegations, smoke usually equals fire. To me, the data puts it over the top.Comment
-
So then what happened in 2006? We must have cheated then? Or again, we are a team that hits lots of HR's?
If we "stopped cheating" why does Bautista still lead the MLB in HR's now? Why are more of his HR's on the fuckin ROAD? He was 2nd on HR's on the road last year?
Why are we 6th in total HR's as a team if we "stopped" ?
Doesn't necessarily mean they didn't continue to cheat in more inconspicuous ways, or just revert back to the Man in White scheme once the confronting team left town.Comment
-
Sounds like they stopped cheating in that particular game, as in, after the bullpen guys confronted Bautista the "man in white" fled for the hills.
Doesn't necessarily mean they didn't continue to cheat in more inconspicuous ways, or just revert back to the Man in White scheme once the confronting team left town.
How a team hitting a NORMAL amount of HR's more than away is cheating is beyond me.
Heaven forbid an "abnormal" stat that doesn't even break records. Feel sorry for the next team that does break a HR record, cause you can only cheat to pull that off apparently.Comment
-
Lol this is so ridiculous.
How a team hitting a NORMAL amount of HR's more than away is cheating is beyond me.
Heaven forbid an "abnormal" stat that doesn't even break records. Feel sorry for the next team that does break a HR record, cause you can only cheat to pull that off apparently.
You're fixating too much on the data, that's just a complimentary piece. What of the first hand testimonies of players? Are you calling them liars?
Why would the Yankees or Red Sox sell a phony story to ESPN about a 4th place team in their division cheating?Comment
-
This is a first hand account from opposing players who claim to have caught the Jays red handed. The data was compiled independently of this report. Whoever tallied that data had no idea about this article, it just happened to reflect a possible pattern that lends credence to the opposing players' story.
You're fixating too much on the data, that's just a complimentary piece. What of the first hand testimonies of players? Are you calling them liars?
Why would the Yankees or Red Sox sell a phony story to ESPN about a 4th place team in their division cheating?
Anyone who can't put their name behind a claim doesn't shows certainty.
Why would ESPN post an article generating controversy involving New York and Boston? Gee I don't know.
Explain the Blue Jays hitting 111 road Home Runs in 2010, clearly we can't do it without cheating.Comment
-
Again, stop fixating on the data.Comment
-
Lol this is so ridiculous.
How a team hitting a NORMAL amount of HR's more than away is cheating is beyond me.
Heaven forbid an "abnormal" stat that doesn't even break records. Feel sorry for the next team that does break a HR record, cause you can only cheat to pull that off apparently.
If you want to chalk that up to the Jays becoming a power team, fine. But then you have to explain their road percentages remaining largely stagnant over the same period. If this was the second coming of the Bronx Bombers, the road data would jump, too.
Its hard to argue a lot of that math at the end of the article, especially when combined with the rest of this. It looks bad.Comment
Comment