Edinson Volquez was great that year, 17-6, 200+ K's, 3.21 ERA, finished fourth in the voting.
Only one problem. He wasn't a rookie.
What would have happened if he had won? Second place finisher wins? Re-do the voting?
Soto won pretty handily over Votto, but let's say you have a year where the voting is tight, and 2nd and 3rd place votes changing could effect the outcome. Could they justify a re-vote if the always incompetent BBWAA gave a bunch of high votes to a non-rookie?
Comment