2012 MLB Over/Unders

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • EmpireWF
    Giants in the Super Bowl
    • Mar 2009
    • 24082

    2012 MLB Over/Unders

    HTML Code:
    New York  93.0  o-115    Detroit     94.0  o-115    Texas       94.0  o-115
    Tampa Bay 87.5  o-122    Kansas City 78.5  u-119    Los Angeles 89.5  o-135
    Boston    87.5  o-115    Chicago     77.5  o-115    Oakland     73.0  o-115
    Toronto   81.5  u-124    Cleveland   75.5  o-115    Seattle     72.5  u-125
    Baltimore 71.0  o-115    Minnesota   74.0  o-115
    
    
    Phila.    95.5  o-115    Cincinnati  87.0  o-115    San Fran.   87.5  u-120
    Atlanta   85.5  o-115    St. Louis   87.0  u-135    Arizona     84.5  o-130
    Miami     82.5  o-145    Milwaukee   81.5  o-115    Colorado    81.5  o-120
    Wash.     81.0  o-122    Chicago     73.5  o-115    Los Angeles 81.5  u-125
    New York  74.5  o-132    Pittsburgh  73.0  o-115    San Diego   70.5  u-128
                             Houston     62.5  u-120

    Houston's that bad.

    The AL Central may be the worst division in baseball.

    Who you got? Tampa or Boston.

    My "locks":

    OVER
    Oakland - 73
    Cubs - 73.5
    San Francisco - 87.5

    UNDER
    Washington - 81
    Cincinnati - 87
    Boston - 87.5

    Where's Warner at? He called one of the teams last year spot on, forgot which one.


  • Rudi
    #CyCueto
    • Nov 2008
    • 9905

    #2
    I would say both the Reds and Cardinals overs are solid. I dunno why you consider the Cubs a lock to win 74 or more games They are in the midst of rebuilding they will be shitty for a year or two. I like the Braves over a lot too.

    edit- and the Mets under

    Comment

    • EmpireWF
      Giants in the Super Bowl
      • Mar 2009
      • 24082

      #3
      I see Oakland and Chicago winning about 75 games.

      I should add there's no way I see 4 teams in the NL West finishing at 500 or above. Just can't decide whether it's Colorado or LA I see below.

      Surprised you think both Cincy & St. Louis are in the 90 win range.


      Comment

      • Villain
        [REDACTED]
        • May 2011
        • 7768

        #4
        Dodgers were over .500 last season and the team looks just about the same (minus Kuroda, replaced a few old guys with a few old guys). I don't see why they can't have another winning record, especially if some young players develop and Ethier plays hard for a new contract. Billingsley could have a good year.
        [REDACTED]

        Comment

        • Kuzzy Powers
          Beautiful Like Moses
          • Oct 2008
          • 12542

          #5
          Jays O 81.5

          Comment

          • Slateman
            Junior Member
            • Apr 2009
            • 2777

            #6
            Nats will get ovef 81 wins. I'm expecting 82-85. I expect them to be within 3 games of the Wild Card (if there are 2 of them) in Mid to late August and then tail off
            The king was shaken. He went up to the room over the gateway and wept.
            As he went, he said: "O my son Absalom! My son, my son Absalom!
            If only I had died instead of you
            O Absalom, my son, my son!"

            Comment

            • Primetime
              Thank You Prince
              • Nov 2008
              • 17526

              #7
              Loss of Prince with the addition of Alex Gonzalez and Aramis Ramirez = 15 less wins? Not sure about that. Pitching will be solid again and I think that will put us at least a few games over .500.

              Comment

              • Warner2BruceTD
                2011 Poster Of The Year
                • Mar 2009
                • 26142

                #8
                Over - HOU, SD, OAK, LAD

                I love Oakland over that number, they always over achieve. I will probably play Houston because its really hard to lose 100 games. Houston's starting pitching isnt terrible with Wandy, Norris, Livan if he makes the team, etc. Brett Myers is closing so thats an improvement. They can be terrible and still beat that number, so that's value. Dodgers were good in the second half when people stopped paying attention. .500 is realistic.

                Under - PIT, COL. Rockies stink, they wont go .500. Pittsburgh has bad starting pitching, you saw what happened when those bum pitchers came down to earth in the second half.

                Comment

                • Warner2BruceTD
                  2011 Poster Of The Year
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 26142

                  #9
                  bump for gob

                  Comment

                  • Slateman
                    Junior Member
                    • Apr 2009
                    • 2777

                    #10
                    Originally posted by JAYrOCK
                    I have a feeling the Cubs are going to surprise some people. Of course I am wearing Cubbie Blue shaded glasses, so take that FWIW
                    Is the plan for the season to bring in Kerry Wood with one run leads?
                    The king was shaken. He went up to the room over the gateway and wept.
                    As he went, he said: "O my son Absalom! My son, my son Absalom!
                    If only I had died instead of you
                    O Absalom, my son, my son!"

                    Comment

                    Working...