No, I get what it means. And it's not sustainable. But that doesn't mean that it will happen this year.
2005 - 258 PA - .341 BABIP
2006 - 228 PA - .298 BABIP (Triple A)
2007 - 324 PA - .349 BABIP (Triple A)
2009 - 472 PA - .364 BABIP (Triple A)
2010 - 293 PA - .330 BABIP
2011 - 575 PA - .344 BABIP
When he gets steady ABs, his BABIP has almost always been high. He strikes out a lot, which brings his average down.
The theory of BABIP is that if it's high, then it's not natural and the player will regress. Of course he will. EVERYONE regresses. It's part of the game.
So to sit there and say that because he had a high BABIP last year, he's due for a regression is a circular arguement. There have been plenty of hitters that had poor BABIP and then rebounded to have great ones the next year. There have been lot's of hitters who maintained a high BABIP for quite a while.
To say that BABIP is the only reason that Morse will regress is a little too dependant on one stat. If you wanted to combine it with K%, OPS and ISO then you would have good arguement. And, frankly, I think BABIP is a better determination of a player's luck than anything else.
2005 - 258 PA - .341 BABIP
2006 - 228 PA - .298 BABIP (Triple A)
2007 - 324 PA - .349 BABIP (Triple A)
2009 - 472 PA - .364 BABIP (Triple A)
2010 - 293 PA - .330 BABIP
2011 - 575 PA - .344 BABIP
When he gets steady ABs, his BABIP has almost always been high. He strikes out a lot, which brings his average down.
The theory of BABIP is that if it's high, then it's not natural and the player will regress. Of course he will. EVERYONE regresses. It's part of the game.
So to sit there and say that because he had a high BABIP last year, he's due for a regression is a circular arguement. There have been plenty of hitters that had poor BABIP and then rebounded to have great ones the next year. There have been lot's of hitters who maintained a high BABIP for quite a while.
To say that BABIP is the only reason that Morse will regress is a little too dependant on one stat. If you wanted to combine it with K%, OPS and ISO then you would have good arguement. And, frankly, I think BABIP is a better determination of a player's luck than anything else.
Comment