A long post that nobody will read about how Joe Girardi relates to Aroldis Chapman

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Warner2BruceTD
    2011 Poster Of The Year
    • Mar 2009
    • 26142

    A long post that nobody will read about how Joe Girardi relates to Aroldis Chapman

    Seattle is said to be interested in Reds pitching coach Bryan Price for their manager opening. He's also in the mix for the Reds, and said to be the early front runner. I think how the Girardi situation plays out will have a lot to do with how it all shakes out. All four teams with openings will be hot for Girardi, obviously. He isn't going to Seattle. That leaves Cubs (history), Nats (the best overall situation because of Harper & Stras), Reds (the most viable contender right now).

    Word out of Cincy is Price favors Chapman as a starter. He's been pushing for that for two years. That was the plan this year (see: Broxton contract), until Chapman told the braintrust he wanted to close. At that point, Dusty preferred to keep him where he was most comfortable, and with six viable starters on the team already, Jocketty & Price conceded defeat.

    Arroyo is history. Great Red. Fantastic trade, and a solid rotation anchor for many years. I tip my cap, and hope he throws those wacky spitters & vasoline balls for many more years in a giant NL West ballpark.

    That leaves Cueto, Latos, Bailey. Rotation locks, all Cy Young darkhorses (new site meme). But seriously, those guys are really good.

    So with Leake & Cingrani in the fold, where does that leave Chapman? You can never have enough starters, but somebody is headed to the pen.

    Well, Chapman clearly has more upside than Leake, who is essentially a 25-year old Arroyo, i.e. a league average starter who throws slop & will give you 200 innings of 105 ERA+ most years. He struggles out of the pen. In a era where the 6th guy out of a good bullpen throws 97 mph, Leake....doesn't. He's also slow to warm up. In short, dude is a starter.

    One solution, is make Cingrani the closer. I mean, the dude throws one viable pitch, a 93 mph fastball that looks like it's 98. I think he proved he can start, but how long can he play that shell game? As a closer, he can scrap the comically bad breaking ball that nobody ever swings at that he throws just to say he throws it. His career 10.6 K/9 & 1.103 WHIP certainly play well as a relief ace.

    The other solution, is trade Leake. Seems like yesterday that Leake shocked baseball and cracked the Reds rotation straight out of Arizona St in 2010. Well, he's been in that rotation for FOUR YEARS now, and is now entering his expensive arbitration years. The ones where even bums get paid. League average starters who never get hurt who have logged nearly 700 innings in four seasons really get paid. He already made over $3M last season. He will get $5-$6M minimum next season (based on what Bailey got, and at the same point in each career Leake is significantly better). Cingrani will make around $500k. That's a huge net savings, and Cingrani will probably be better anyway. If you are going to trade Leake, the time is now, with two years of team control remaining, coming off what is probably his best possible season.

    Trading Leake means Broxton closes. Eww. Dicey proposition, but take a look around at some of the playoff teams around baseball and you see plenty of dicey closer propositions (Cleveland, Detroit, St Louis, Boston burned through 19 guys, etc). A great closer is truly a luxury. The 9th would be quite a bit less flashy next season, but you'd have to live with it.

    Of course, you could trade perhaps your best trade chip of all. Chapman.

    Chapman could net you a nice haul of prospect geeks from a team who think they could start him, or maybe even fill the impending CF (or LF or RH power bat) hole. If the dude is dead set on not wanting to start, i'm not opposed to moving him. Because reliever.

    The best potential rotation, with incredible upside, is this...

    Cueto
    Latos
    Bailey
    Chapman
    Cingrani

    ...but holy shit is that volatile. If Cingrani's shell game comes apart, no biggie, he's the fifth starter. Very few teams have a good fifth starter, the Reds have been very lucky in that regard the past few years to have no rotation holes. The issue, is if the league catches up to Cingrani, and the Cuban Missile fails to launch. Presuming Leake would be traded, now you're fucked. Robert Stephenson & Nick Travieso are not going to be ready till '15 at the earliest.

    My preference is that the Reds hire Price - now. I like Girardi, but I think the Reds will be his third choice at best, and I happen to think Price is a rising star. And, he'll likely start Chapman. It's year five. It's time to find out either way if he can do it.
  • Villain
    [REDACTED]
    • May 2011
    • 7768

    #2
    Yeah I would be shocked if Girardi went anywhere other than Chicago if he doesn't stay with the Yankees. Chicago represents an awesome opportunity if he ends up being that "develop the young players into stars" manager they are hoping for. He would be an all-time legend and own that town if he succeeded. I doubt there's much of a financial incentive to stay in NY over Chicago because I won't doubt that the Cubs would be willing to match NY's offer. The only reason to stay in NY now is if you want to stay there forever.

    As to the Reds rotation, that would be fun to watch.
    [REDACTED]

    Comment

    • Goober
      Needs a hobby
      • Feb 2009
      • 12271

      #3
      In the chatbox the other day Warner said he hopes the reds give Arroyo a qualifying offer, and he accepts it. Discuss.

      Comment

      • Warner2BruceTD
        2011 Poster Of The Year
        • Mar 2009
        • 26142

        #4
        I think that's a no lose situation.

        He won't sign it though.

        Comment

        • Goober
          Needs a hobby
          • Feb 2009
          • 12271

          #5
          Originally posted by Warner2BruceTD
          I think that's a no lose situation.

          He won't sign it though.
          If Arroyo gets a qualifying offer, I think he would be foolish not too. He would be extremely hard pressed to find a team willing to give up a first round pick to sign him.

          Comment

          • Warner2BruceTD
            2011 Poster Of The Year
            • Mar 2009
            • 26142

            #6
            Originally posted by Goobyslayer
            If Arroyo gets a qualifying offer, I think he would be foolish not too. He would be extremely hard pressed to find a team willing to give up a first round pick to sign him.
            He has been adamant about a multi year deal.

            Obviously if nobody comes knocking...

            This is why I say its win/win for Reds. They don't need him, but they wouldn't mind having him back.

            Comment

            • Villain
              [REDACTED]
              • May 2011
              • 7768

              #7
              Originally posted by Goobyslayer
              In the chatbox the other day Warner said he hopes the reds give Arroyo a qualifying offer, and he accepts it. Discuss.
              Doesn't sound too ridiculous to me. 1-year deals (even if they are ~14mil) aren't going to hamstring a season for you. Worst case scenario is you eat the salary and DFA/trade him if he ends up being a disaster - which I doubt. If he is stupid enough to decline it, he probably signs with a team that has a protected pick. A second-round pick ain't shabby at all.

              That being said, I wouldn't make him the offer. If you really want him back next season, I don't think it would be impossible to sign him to a one-year deal for cheaper than a QO, and then since he will want a longer contract he can probably be had with a team option+buyout for second year.
              [REDACTED]

              Comment

              • Warner2BruceTD
                2011 Poster Of The Year
                • Mar 2009
                • 26142

                #8
                He wants three years:

                Bronson Arroyo says he wants a three-year deal and he feels his time in Cincinnati is likely over. “I have no preference on where I want to pitch but I’ll certainly consider the team, their chances of winning, and all of that,” he said. “I feel I can pitch effectively at 37, 38, and 39 years old. I’ve never missed a start. Never been injured. I’m not a max-effort guy out there, so there’s no big-time wear and tear on me. I loved Cincinnati but I don’t think they’re in position to give me what I want.” Cafardo suggests the Blue Jays, Orioles, Brewers, Cubs, Giants, Pirates, Cardinals, and Dodgers as possibilities.

                Another Arroyo quote. Reds haven't talked to him at all to this point:

                Bronson Arroyo tells MLB.com's Mark Sheldon that he "hasn't heard a word" from the Reds, and he's being realistic and assuming that he won't return in 2014. Arroyo doesn't get the sense that he'll receive a qualifying offer, and he says he understands the business reasons for parting ways with Tony Cingrani able to fill his rotation spot for the league minimum: "It’s a question of whether they want a $28 million rotation or a $42 million rotation. They have Cingrani and probably don’t want to push the envelope money-wise." Presumably, the $14MM gap referenced by Arroyo is in regards to the expected $14MM of a one-year, qualifying offer.

                Comment

                • Goober
                  Needs a hobby
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 12271

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Villain
                  Doesn't sound too ridiculous to me. 1-year deals (even if they are ~14mil) aren't going to hamstring a season for you. Worst case scenario is you eat the salary and DFA/trade him if he ends up being a disaster - which I doubt. If he is stupid enough to decline it, he probably signs with a team that has a protected pick. A second-round pick ain't shabby at all.

                  That being said, I wouldn't make him the offer. If you really want him back next season, I don't think it would be impossible to sign him to a one-year deal for cheaper than a QO, and then since he will want a longer contract he can probably be had with a team option+buyout for second year.
                  Astros, Twins, Marlins, Bluejays, Cubs, Mets, White Sox, Mariners, Phillies, Rockies.

                  Which one of these teams do you see signing Arroyo? Just curious.

                  Comment

                  • Warner2BruceTD
                    2011 Poster Of The Year
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 26142

                    #10
                    Also, this:

                    "It wouldn't be shocking" if the Reds traded Homer Bailey to create some payroll space, MLB.com's Mark Sheldon opines. Bailey earned $5.3MM last season and MLBTR's Matt Swartz projects that he could earn $9.3MM in arbitration. Though Bailey has been one of the Reds' best pitchers over the last two years, he "has shown little interest in signing" a multiyear deal with the team, Sheldon writes, so the Reds could move him now before possibly losing him in free agency after next season.
                    There has been rumblings of trading Bailey since last season. He has no friends on the team and is considered a real outsider in the clubhouse, fwiw.

                    Another reason I wouldn't completely close the door on Arroyo. If the Reds intend to trade Bailey, you have to think about bringing Arroyo back if you can.

                    Comment

                    • Warner2BruceTD
                      2011 Poster Of The Year
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 26142

                      #11

                      Comment

                      • ram29jackson
                        Noob
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 0

                        #12
                        does it really take that long a write up to say..maybe a reliever or starter in general ?
                        Last edited by ram29jackson; 10-11-2013, 10:19 PM.

                        Comment

                        • Warner2BruceTD
                          2011 Poster Of The Year
                          • Mar 2009
                          • 26142

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Warner2BruceTD
                          I think that's a no lose situation.

                          He won't sign it though.

                          Comment

                          • Warner2BruceTD
                            2011 Poster Of The Year
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 26142

                            #14
                            Looks like no qualifying offer for Arroyo, which makes zero sense, unless they are pinching pennies for Choo or another expensive FA. If not, this is pretty stupid. Tossing away a free draft pick or a relatively cheap year of 200 decent innings.

                            Comment

                            • Warner2BruceTD
                              2011 Poster Of The Year
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 26142

                              #15
                              The only consolation, is it's pretty much a lock he's going to SF, and I think they were bottom ten.

                              Comment

                              Working...