The 33 Most Productive Players in the NBA

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dell71
    Enter Sandman
    • Mar 2009
    • 23919

    The 33 Most Productive Players in the NBA

    The 33 most productive players in the NBA

    As the 2009-‘10 NBA season gets underway, the arguments persists about who are the best players in the league. Statistically speaking, I have an answer. Well, not really an answer, more like a guide. That is the Total Production Percentage, henceforth known as TP%.

    TP% is a simple, yet fairly comprehensive stat. The formula is as follows:

    (Points + Rebounds + Assists + Steals + Blocked Shots) – Turnovers/Minutes Played

    Admittedly, it’s not an absolute answer for several reasons. Most prominently, there’s no accounting for intangibles. This includes things like leadership and hustle. Like I said, it is a guide and at least lets you know who is worthy of at least being in the conversation.

    So why would I list the top 33 finishers? That’s an odd number. The easy answer is that these are the only players who finished with a TP% of .800 or higher during the 2008-’09 season. A little less than half that, 15 players had what I call elite level production of .900 or higher and only 5 reached the magical 1.000 plateau.

    Oh, before I go any further only players who played 1500 minutes or more are eligible.

    Without any further adieu, here they are:


    There are definitely a few surprises. Some popular players you might ask about:
    And the worst of the worst:

    Discuss.
  • red33
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2009
    • 5065

    #2
    fat ass zach im the worst player ever randolph elite?

    battier one of the worst? im sure every gm would take battier over fat ass zach i look like a burnt gummy bear randolph.

    Comment

    • Bear Pand
      RIP Indy Colts
      • Feb 2009
      • 5945

      #3
      Wow at how many non playoff teams had multiple players in the top 33.

      Clippers, T'Wolves, Pacers and Nets.

      I like numbers like this for fantasy basketball but that's about it.

      Comment

      • red33
        Junior Member
        • Feb 2009
        • 5065

        #4
        Originally posted by Killa Pand
        Wow at how many non playoff teams had multiple players in the top 33.

        Clippers, T'Wolves, Pacers and Nets.

        I like numbers like this for fantasy basketball but that's about it.
        this is actualy a good point.

        Comment

        • A Tasty Burgerr
          ▄█▀ █▬█ █ ▀█▀
          • Oct 2008
          • 5916

          #5
          Originally posted by Bullsfan
          Bowen lol, surprising to see Charlie in the top 15 as well.
          I forget the exact numbers, but when CV got 30+ minutes he averaged something like 18/8. Its a shame he's the shittiest defensive forward east of Phoenix.


          This is an interesting stat, I wouldn't say quite as accurate as PER (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Player_Efficiency_Rating) but still neat. Everyone should be able to see that Bruce Bowen is the most useless peice of garbage in the league without it though


          EDIT: I'm surprised Jared Jeffries and Chuck Hayes aren't in the bottom 15
          Last edited by A Tasty Burgerr; 10-24-2009, 09:15 PM.

          Comment

          • BUCK3YE5
            CP 2K12
            • Aug 2009
            • 1410

            #6
            2 Cavs in top 10....haha

            Comment

            • dell71
              Enter Sandman
              • Mar 2009
              • 23919

              #7
              Originally posted by red33
              fat ass zach im the worst player ever randolph elite?

              battier one of the worst? im sure every gm would take battier over fat ass zach i look like a burnt gummy bear randolph.
              Like I said, it doesn't accunt at all for intangibles. Fact is, Randolph puts up numbers even though he doesn't really seem to help you win as much as his stats would lead you to believe.

              ATB: Both Jeffries and Hayes played fewer than 1500 minutes, barely 800 in Hayes' case.

              Comment

              • Juggernaut
                Sitting on the Sidelines
                • Dec 2008
                • 5669

                #8
                Happy with Dirk's placing

                Suprised Caron Butler isnt higher, he does everything for the Wiz

                Comment

                • corbin
                  Senior Member
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 1963

                  #9
                  Yikes don't agree with a lot of these players

                  Comment

                  • dell71
                    Enter Sandman
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 23919

                    #10
                    Originally posted by corbin
                    Yikes don't agree with a lot of these players
                    You might not agree that player x isn't really one of the best players in the league but the stat is what it is. That's how they finished.

                    Comment

                    • dell71
                      Enter Sandman
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 23919

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Rajon-Rondo
                      The top 30, for the most part, really resembles PER.
                      Indeed.

                      Comment

                      • Archer
                        Go the fuck outside
                        • Oct 2008
                        • 15303

                        #12
                        Granger is no suprise

                        Murphy shocks me ..... he is generally clumsy with the ball for us . While he can shoot and grab boards he tends to turn it over

                        Comment

                        • dell71
                          Enter Sandman
                          • Mar 2009
                          • 23919

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Xixak
                          I think it only takes pts, rebs, and assists into account. Doesn't care about defense (hence Bowen and Battier being 2 lowest.)
                          It does take steals & blocks into account and subtracts for turnovers. It doesn't account for plays/actions that don't result in a stat. So frustrating your man into passing the ball or taking a bad shot is not taken into consideration unless you steal that pass or block that shot.

                          Besides Bowen hasn't really been that great a defender for a few years now.

                          Comment

                          • dell71
                            Enter Sandman
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 23919

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Rip City
                            basketball stats are meaningless nowadays. The people whole play selfish will always get better stats. If it took into account team play Shane Battier would be in the top 10.

                            I cant think of one stat that isnt flawed somehow.
                            You could probably say that about stats in every sport.

                            Comment

                            Working...