Woooooo we made the NIT. Go Heels!
NCAA Basketball 09-10 Thread
Collapse
X
-
-
Hopefully Washington can win that game, because I like having to play New Mexico St. in the 2nd.
Watch out though Washington has started to play like the top 25 label they had at the beginning of the season.
It should make for a good up tempo game.Comment
-
-
They had a real argument for the tourney. It sucks that they didn't make it in. All the more reason why there should be four play-in games for the #16 seeds. It would allow in three more teams, and on a usual season, there are 2-5 teams with a good argument.Comment
-
What do you guys think about my NIT bracket?:
Does it make you lulz?
Comment
-
Just made my bracket with WVU over Kansas State in the national championship. I know it ain't gonna happen but at least i can say i called it if it happens.
Originally posted by Tailback UIt won't say shit, because dying is for pussies.Comment
-
My team vs. your team for the championship, unfortunately I see WVU losing to Kentucky and KSU losing to KU.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Depends on whether or not Siena has size. I don't know a thing about their team and don't care enough to research them, but Purdue will be alright until they run into a team with size. What Purdue lacks in scoring and size they make up for in perimeter D. The size hurts them a lot because then JaJuan Johnson can't get his on offense, and we don't have enough big men who can do anything on D. Patrick Bade is a fucking joke.
Look at what Minnesota did to Purdue, they basically raped Purdue on the boards and on the inside. Michigan State did the same thing. I think at one point Purdue was running a 4 guard lineup during the Minny game, while Minny had like 2-3 bigmen out there who were just getting whaetever they wanted. If Siena is a smaller team Purdue shouldn't have too much of an issue with them.Last edited by Bear Pand; 03-15-2010, 08:29 AM.Comment
-
Depends on whether or not Siena has size. I don't know a thing about their team and don't care enough to research them, but Purdue will be alright until they run into a team with size. What Purdue lacks in scoring and size they make up for in perimeter D. The size hurts them a lot because then JaJuan Johnson can't get his on offense, and we don't have enough big men who can do anything on D. Patrick Bade is a fucking joke.
Look at what Minnesota did to Purdue, they basically raped Purdue on the boards and on the inside. Michigan State did the same thing. I think at one point Purdue was running a 4 guard lineup during the Minny game, while Minny had like 2-3 bigmen out there who were just getting whaetever they wanted. If Siena is a smaller team Purdue shouldn't have too much of an issue with them.Comment
-
-
I think the distribution of the good teams by the Selection Committee this year leaves a lot to be desired. IMO, there are absolutely no good teams in the South, and the West is much weaker than the East or Midwest. Kansas actually has the most difficult road to the Final Four among the #1 seeds, and allegedly they got the overall #1. Duke has by far the easiest road to the Final Four, yet they were the lowest #1 seed. I wanted to have Villanova going out early, but there is literally no one that can lose to in their region.
Pathetic.Comment
-
I would agree Senser. Looking at Kansas' region they have 4 of the top 15(OhSt, Mich St, G'Town, and Tennessee) teams in the nation in their region. Plus Maryland and UNI.(UNI is not ranked in the AP but is in the ESPN Coaches poll)
Duke on the other hand has two "Top 10" teams in their region but they are very flawed. Purdue isn't nearly the same team without Hummel and Villanova has gone ice cold down the stretch. The other three ranked teams are Texas A&M, Baylor and Richmond, one of which (Richmond) isn't even ranked in both polls.
PLUS they face the play-in game winner.
Coach K was basically handed a Final Four birth by the committee.
*EDITED* Baylor is in Duke's region as well.Last edited by FirstTimer; 03-15-2010, 03:15 PM.Comment
Comment