Sources: Ariza to Hornets in four-team trade

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ralaw
    Posts too much
    • Feb 2009
    • 6663

    #16
    Originally posted by KNUBB
    Hornets also got rid of Julian Wright for Marco Belinelli. With those two bad contracts off the book it gives the Hornets just a little bit more room to play with. Ariza will be the 3rd Option depending of Marcus Thornton's play. Thornton could easily be the primary scorer on this team. As of now though the scoring options are as such.

    1. CP3
    2. David West
    3. Marcus Thornton
    4. Trevor Ariza
    5. Okafor

    The Hornets have been in desperate need of a good wing play for quite a few years. This is definitely a good move.

    As for Collison I am happy he is gonna get the opportunity to shine somewhere. He is a really good player that would have been stuck in CP3's shadow.
    Any team Thornton is the #1 option on would be a lottery team. The Hornets have needed a wing, but I hope they also understand that a nucleus of West, Thornton, Ariza and Okafor isn't going to compete with the top teams in the league. If they want CP to stay I'd hope they're planning on packaging Ariza and some pieces for Melo.

    They should take what happened to the Cavs as a blueprint. Don't bring in a bunch of marginal to decent players, take on bad contracts and expect to keep your superstar......trade him before you lose him for nothing.

    Comment

    • KNUBB
      WHITE RONDO
      • Jun 2009
      • 7973

      #17
      Originally posted by ralaw
      Any team Thornton is the #1 option on would be a lottery team. The Hornets have needed a wing, but I hope they also understand that a nucleus of West, Thornton, Ariza and Okafor isn't going to compete with the top teams in the league. If they want CP to stay I'd hope they're planning on packaging Ariza and some pieces for Melo.

      They should take what happened to the Cavs as a blueprint. Don't bring in a bunch of marginal to decent players, take on bad contracts and expect to keep your superstar......trade him before you lose him for nothing.
      Marcus Thornton off the bench averaged 14.5 points off the bench and 21.3 pts in games that he started it. Have you ever seen the kid play. Dude is a scorer. You are talking to someone who follows the Hornets religiously. So until you bring some facts in here then you can


      :stfu:



      He scored 37 points vs. the Cavs with LeBron.


      Comment

      • ralaw
        Posts too much
        • Feb 2009
        • 6663

        #18
        Originally posted by KNUBB
        Marcus Thornton off the bench averaged 14.5 points off the bench and 21.3 pts in games that he started it. Have you ever seen the kid play. Dude is a scorer. You are talking to someone who follows the Hornets religiously. So until you bring some facts in here then you can


        :stfu:



        He scored 37 points vs. the Cavs with LeBron.

        I knew you'd throw out the "I follow the Hornets...don't tell me nothing" line, as if that proves anything. I'm wondering if this is the time when I should throw out the "Your a homer line!!11!!. There is a difference between being a scorer and being a primary scorer/#1 option on a team. If you think a guy who scores 14ppg and 21ppg in stints can be a primary #1 option on a legit team than you must think Flip Murray could be the same.

        There are guys who are great at what they do within the role that they're supposed to do it in, but being a primary #1 go to scorer on a successful (ie championship contender) team is a whole different ballgame. I'm sure Thornton could put up 20ppg as the primary scorer on a mediocre team, but he'd probably be doing it with a poor efficiency and at the end of the day that doesn't accomplish or mean much. Thornton is good and at his best in the role that he's currently in, which is being a 3rd/4th option, while playing along a good pg and pf that can take some of the pressure/attention off of him.

        LOL, at you point of "he scored 37 against the Cavs when Lebron was playing (does that mean LeBron was actually on the court"?) Wow, that is awesome. Dana Barros once scored 50 when Hakeem Olajuwon was on the Rockets!!11!

        Comment

        • KNUBB
          WHITE RONDO
          • Jun 2009
          • 7973

          #19
          Originally posted by ralaw
          I knew you'd throw out the "I follow the Hornets...don't tell me nothing" line, as if that proves anything. I'm wondering if this is the time when I should throw out the "Your a homer line!!11!!. There is a difference between being a scorer and being a primary scorer/#1 option on a team. If you think a guy who scores 14ppg and 21ppg in stints can be a primary #1 option on a legit team than you must think Flip Murray could be the same.

          There are guys who are great at what they do within the role that they're supposed to do it in, but being a primary #1 go to scorer on a successful (ie championship contender) team is a whole different ballgame. I'm sure Thornton could put up 20ppg as the primary scorer on a mediocre team, but he'd probably be doing it with a poor efficiency and at the end of the day that doesn't accomplish or mean much. Thornton is good and at his best in the role that he's currently in, which is being a 3rd/4th option, while playing along a good pg and pf that can take some of the pressure/attention off of him.

          LOL, at you point of "he scored 37 against the Cavs when Lebron was playing (does that mean LeBron was actually on the court"?) Wow, that is awesome. Dana Barros once scored 50 when Hakeem Olajuwon was on the Rockets!!11!


          I am a realist and will be the 1st person to tell you that the Hornets still have a long way to go, but Thornton is used to being the primary scorer. I said he is capable of being the primary scorer not that he is the primary scorer. So you are saying that Thornton would not be as productive on any contending team lets say San Antonio(They may be getting old, but they are always in the playoffs) you are saying he would not be able to put up the production he currently does. AND yes Thornton made Bron Bron look silly on quite a few occasions with steals for fast breaks and shots in LeBron's face. Dude was a rookie. It seems as if you are failing to realize that this guy is fully capable of being a #1 option. Gonna have to show you then.

          [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Om4JY__bV2o[/ame]


          Comment

          • ralaw
            Posts too much
            • Feb 2009
            • 6663

            #20
            Originally posted by KNUBB
            I am a realist and will be the 1st person to tell you that the Hornets still have a long way to go, but Thornton is used to being the primary scorer.


            I said he is capable of being the primary scorer not that he is the primary scorer.
            You contradicted yourself here, because at first you said that, "Thornton is used to being the primary scorer," and than you said, ".......not that he is the primary scorer"

            However, that doesn't matter. My point is that Thornton is fully capable of being a primary scorer, but on a lottery team. If Thornton is you're #1 option and in most cases that means he's your best player (or at least 2nd best), than that team is going to have problems. I'm not saying he's a bad player, because he's an excellent 3rd/4rd/5th option role player. He could get better, but right now I would not want him as my favorite teams' primary scorer....at least if I had hopes of my team contending.

            So you are saying that Thornton would not be as productive on any contending team lets say San Antonio(They may be getting old, but they are always in the playoffs) you are saying he would not be able to put up the production he currently does.
            Thornton on the Spurs would be the 4th/5th/6th option..... not the primary #1 option/scorer. If you say he's the primary scorer than you're saying that he's the best scorer. With the Spurs he'd be competing with Jefferson and George Hill to be the 4th/5th/6th option. So, no I say he wouldn't be able to put up 20ppg+ on the Spurs and that team still be able to contend. Actually, I can't think of any contending team that he would be the 3rd option let alone the primary scorer on.

            Again, I said if he's your primary option your team is going to be in the lottery. Look around the league and at history at contending teams. Every contending team has/had a perennial all-star/superstar player as the leading primary scorer. Thornton isn't at that level.

            AND yes Thornton made Bron Bron look silly on quite a few occasions with steals for fast breaks and shots in LeBron's face. Dude was a rookie.
            I'd like to see him do it as the primary scorer and primary player the defense focuses on night in and night out before a crown him. I'd be willing to bet if James locked down on him most of that wouldn't have happened. He had a good game, but that doesn't equate to being capable of being the #1 option on a contending team.

            It seems as if you are failing to realize that this guy is fully capable of being a #1 option. Gonna have to show you then.

            highlight tape
            You're showing me a highlight tape to prove your point?

            Comment

            • j.hen
              Self Care
              • Oct 2008
              • 10058

              #21
              You both should just give up. Arguments like this go nowhere.

              Comment

              • KNUBB
                WHITE RONDO
                • Jun 2009
                • 7973

                #22
                Originally posted by ralaw
                You contradicted yourself here, because at first you said that, "Thornton is used to being the primary scorer," and than you said, ".......not that he is the primary scorer"
                He isn't the primary scorer on the Hornets. He was the primary scorer for LSU for 3 years. He led the SEC is scoring for 2 of those 3 years.


                Comment

                Working...