LeBron: Contraction 'would be great for league'

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Chrispy
    Needs a hobby
    • Dec 2008
    • 11403

    LeBron: Contraction 'would be great for league'

    PHOENIX -- This won't make LeBron James popular at the next player's union meeting, but Thursday he suggested the NBA would be more entertaining if there was contraction of teams.

    In defending his decision to join up with Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh on the Miami Heat, James said the league was better when numerous teams had multiple stars. He said he hopes the league can return to that someday, because right now there isn't enough talent to support the 30 current teams.

    "Hopefully the league can figure out one way where it can go back to the '80s where you had three or four All-Stars, three or four superstars, three or four Hall of Famers on the same team," James said. "The league was great. It wasn't as watered down as it is [now]."

    In fact, James seemed to have a couple of ideas of which teams could go and some players that would make other teams better right now.

    "[Contraction] is not my job; I'm a player but that is why it the league was so great," James said.

    "Imagine if you could take Kevin Love off Minnesota and add him to another team and you shrink the [league]. Looking at some of the teams that aren't that great, you take Brook Lopez or you take Devin Harris off these teams that aren't that good right now and you add him to a team that could be really good. Not saying let's take New Jersey and let's take Minnesota out of the league. But hey, you guys are not stupid, I'm not stupid, it would be great for the league."

    Perhaps that's a hint why James didn't seriously consider signing with the Nets last summer.

    James spoke on the issue before taking on the Phoenix Suns, but much of the focus this week is on Saturday when the Heat are part of the Christmas Day main event against the Lakers in Los Angeles.

    James said Wednesday he doesn't enjoy playing on Christmas even if it is the main attraction on the league's regular season schedule.

    James said Christmas game wouldn't be such a big deal if there were fewer teams like in the '80s.

    "You had more [star] players on a team, which made almost every game anticipated, not just a Christmas Day game," James said. "I don't ever think it is bad for the league when guys decide they want to do some greatness for what we call a team sport."

    Brian Windhorst covers the Miami Heat for ESPN.com

    This won't make LeBron James popular at the next players' union meeting, but Thursday he suggested the NBA would be more entertaining if there was contraction of teams.
  • IamMedellin
    Everything Burns...
    • Nov 2008
    • 10910

    #2
    he's bobby Kotick




    Comment

    • Boucher
      King of EDM
      • Jul 2009
      • 3733

      #3
      Raptors can stay

      Comment

      • DoubleDeuce
        Spellin' n' shit
        • Feb 2009
        • 5873

        #4
        I actually agree with him.

        Comment

        • Primetime
          Thank You Prince
          • Nov 2008
          • 17526

          #5
          Shows his competitive side a little bit. Anybody with common sense knows a contraction would be good for the league though.

          Comment

          • stevsta
            ¿Que?
            • Oct 2008
            • 4670

            #6
            hornets, raptors, timberwolves, clippers, bobcats, cavs

            trash em
            RIP

            Comment

            • Mogriffjr
              aka Reece
              • Apr 2009
              • 2759

              #7
              contract cleveland first...lol
              Originally posted by Nick Mangold
              Wes Welker is a great player. He's really taken advantage of watching film. If we don't keep a Spy on him, he could really open the Gate.

              Comment

              • Juggernaut
                Sitting on the Sidelines
                • Dec 2008
                • 5670

                #8
                Originally posted by stevsta
                hornets, raptors, timberwolves, clippers, bobcats, cavs

                trash em
                Raptors are wildly popular, they have great atmosphere. Sucks they can't find 2 players to build around.

                Sounds racist, but I can't imagine how big of a pop they would get if they could get galo from the knicks. With Bargs and Galo, they would have an exciting duo to market and would imo, make the playoffs as a low to mid level seed.

                Comment

                • NAHSTE
                  Probably owns the site
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 22233

                  #9
                  Totally agree with him. We had this very conversation in the chat box the other day but it would be great for the remaining teams. Memphis is top of the chopping list imo.

                  Comment

                  • krulmichael
                    STRAAAAANGE MUSIC!
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 10721

                    #10
                    As long as they kept Detroit (which they would, good history there) I'm down.

                    Twitch Channel
                    http://www.twitch.tv/krulmichael20


                    Season I: 10-6 (NFC North Champions)
                    Season II: 9-7 (NFC North Champions)
                    Season III: 13-3 (NFC Champions)
                    Season IV: 11-5 (NFC North Champions)
                    Season V: 2-1

                    Comment

                    • Primetime
                      Thank You Prince
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 17526

                      #11
                      Get rid of the Bucks. No one in Wisconsin even gives a shit about them. They've lost money the past few years anyway.

                      Comment

                      • ralaw
                        Posts too much
                        • Feb 2009
                        • 6663

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Juggernaut
                        Raptors are wildly popular, they have great atmosphere. Sucks they can't find 2 players to build around.

                        Sounds racist, but I can't imagine how big of a pop they would get if they could get galo from the knicks. With Bargs and Galo, they would have an exciting duo to market and would imo, make the playoffs as a low to mid level seed.
                        Its strange that in Canada the Raptors remain huge, but outside of Canada the Raptors are seen as a dead franchise. I've always said that if the Raptors are going to build into an elite franchise they'd have to do it with building around the best international players, because most of the American born elite players aren't going to play in Canada.

                        Comment

                        • Kuzzy Powers
                          Beautiful Like Moses
                          • Oct 2008
                          • 12542

                          #13
                          Originally posted by ralaw
                          Its strange that in Canada the Raptors remain huge, but outside of Canada the Raptors are seen as a dead franchise. I've always said that if the Raptors are going to build into an elite franchise they'd have to do it with building around the best international players, because most of the American born elite players aren't going to play in Canada.
                          You have to get them when they're young and build a team together with them. I dont think American players are unwiling to play in Canada, its just not very appealing for a Free Agent to come here when the team isnt even close to success anyways. Having to come to another country just makes it worse for potential free agents. But if you get them when they're young and have a team grow together theres no reason they wouldnt want to stay. If Chris Bosh had a contending team around him I dont think he wouldve bolted. But noone wants to play in the "stigma" of Canada on a non-contender.

                          Comment

                          • Warner2BruceTD
                            2011 Poster Of The Year
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 26142

                            #14
                            No reason for the Bobcats or Grizzlies to exists. No history, no fan base, no reason to keep these franchises around.

                            Even hardcore NBA fans generally agree that the league overexpanded. I think the NFL is right on the cusp at 32, and MLB could probably add two more without negative impact (but I wouldnt do it).

                            Comment

                            • Hasselbeck
                              Jus' bout dat action boss
                              • Feb 2009
                              • 6175

                              #15
                              Agree with LeBron 100%.
                              Originally posted by ram29jackson
                              I already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SB

                              Comment

                              Working...