If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having trouble accessing your account and don't remember your password, email help@virtualsportsnetwork.com and i'll get you an updated password for 2024.
He kept AI from getting his ring and for that I've always hated the fat fuck. Can't deny how unstoppable he was down-low during his Laker years. You could double and triple team the guy and he'd still slam it home.
1. Wilt Chamberlain
2. Kareem Abdul Jabbar
3. Bill Russell
4. Hakeem Olajuwon
5. Shaquille O'Neal
He's first ballot HOF but I don't think he's a Top 10 NBA player of all time. Top 20 probably.
This is my thought.. would be hard pressed to put Shaq in my top 10.. top 15-20 for sure, I cant really argue any of those 4 Centers being ahead of Shaq.
Superbly dominant. Top 10 all time no doubt in my mind.
I wouldn't call him lazy, either. He was awesome with the Magic but so young. How many young dominant players come into the league and win championships right away?
As he matured, you saw him get better and make his teammates better.
And unless you've played with him or know what it's like to be 7+ feet tall and 300+ pounds and play a professional sport then you have no idea if the guy was lazy or not.
I dont even know where the lazy shit stems from.. I see no reason to believe Shaq was lazy, he couldnt have been all that much more dominant without keeping the rest of his team involved. Shaq is a pretty damn good passer for a man that large aswell.
had this convo with someone, HNIC i think about Hakeem VS Shaq. I said Hakeemw as best Center ive ever seen play, he said Shaq. Hakeem had about 4 years he was probably best player or at best center in the game. But looking at Shaqs, the man had a good 6 year stretch or so of being the best center or player in the game.
I guess it comes down to likes really since hakeem was more of a finesse center while shaq wasnt. Looking at pure numbers SHaq kills in pts and rebounds but looking at other stats like steals, assists, and blocks, hakeem has the edge.
Id say Hakeem over shaq but if someone were to say shaq over hakeem i wouldnt be against it.
I dont even know where the lazy shit stems from.. I see no reason to believe Shaq was lazy, he couldnt have been all that much more dominant without keeping the rest of his team involved. Shaq is a pretty damn good passer for a man that large aswell.
I think it's from when he kind of blew up to over or near 400lbs
This is my thought.. would be hard pressed to put Shaq in my top 10.. top 15-20 for sure, I cant really argue any of those 4 Centers being ahead of Shaq.
Shaq would stick his giant dick in each of those center, sans, maybe Wilt, but Shaq was a better post-season performer than teh Stilt.
Comment