Nate Robinson traded

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mfbmike
    Goat****er
    • Nov 2008
    • 4793

    Nate Robinson traded

    what the? what kind of contract is nate on? lol. good god Donnie Walsh is gunning for 2010 FA, balls to the wall style.
  • LC AAU
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2008
    • 14217

    #2
    wow, thats fucked up, Kings looking good. I mean come on, they got Sam Cassel LOL
    sig is too big, resize it

    Comment

    • Point Blank
      Needs a hobby
      • Oct 2008
      • 14184

      #3
      Damn the Kings making moves! They might be my new 2k9 squad.

      Comment

      • Obst
        RIP West
        • Oct 2008
        • 4182

        #4
        The Knicks did not agree to trade Nate Robinson and Jared Jeffries to the Kings for Kenny Thomas.

        Comment

        • Youk
          Posts too much
          • Feb 2009
          • 7998

          #5
          I'm gonna laugh when the Knicks fail at grabbing LeBron or anyone else great in the 2010 class.

          Comment

          • Obst
            RIP West
            • Oct 2008
            • 4182

            #6
            So once again we see where good ole Sam ends up

            Comment

            • Deviant
              Yes, please.
              • Nov 2008
              • 2861

              #7
              Oh... now everyone likes the Kings and wants to play with the Kings. Well, hoo-da-ha.

              Originally posted by Youk
              I'm gonna laugh when the Knicks fail at grabbing LeBron or anyone else great in the 2010 class.
              Yeah... because he's not leaving Cleveland. It would be the dumbest move of his career to leave the great team he has now for a WIP Knicks teams.
              Last edited by Deviant; 02-19-2009, 04:19 PM.


              Back at it, yet again. Sign up here!

              Comment

              • Obst
                RIP West
                • Oct 2008
                • 4182

                #8
                Originally posted by deviantthoughts
                Oh... now everyone likes the Kings and wants to play with the Kings. Well, hoo-da-ha.



                Yeah... because he's not leaving Cleveland. It would be the dumbest move of his career to leave the great team he has now for a WIP Knicks teams.
                Yeah it makes most sense that LeBron stays in Cleveland. I don't see him leaving for New York or Brooklyn.

                Comment

                • Rayman
                  Spic 'n Spanish
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 4626

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Youk
                  I'm gonna laugh when the Knicks fail at grabbing LeBron or anyone else great in the 2010 class.
                  There'll be others.

                  LeBron is the target, but plenty of other big names will be available.

                  Thank God Nate is staying put.



                  Comment

                  • SuperNova854
                    Hobo Pride
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 8161

                    #10
                    Now that Cassell was cut, he can coach the Clippers and Mike Dumbleavy can rot in hell! yay

                    1984 Record: 44-38 (9th in west)
                    1985 Record: 42-40 (7th in west; 1st round exit)
                    1986 Record: 51-31 (3rd in west; swept in finals)


                    The Grizzlies theme this season should be : "This Season, We're Doing It For The Lulz"

                    Comment

                    • Lanteri
                      No longer a noob
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 2723

                      #11
                      Originally posted by deviantthoughts
                      Oh... now everyone likes the Kings and wants to play with the Kings. Well, hoo-da-ha.



                      Yeah... because he's not leaving Cleveland. It would be the dumbest move of his career to leave the great team he has now for a WIP Knicks teams.
                      Have to disagree with you there. The Cavs have a decent supporting cast, but nothing they couldn't get LeBron in New York. Z's getting up there in age, and the rest of his "team" is a bunch of spot up 3 point shooters. If New York keeps Robinson, Lee, Chandler, and Gallinari around and add LeBron they'll have decent enough talent where it wouldn't be a huge difference. Especially since they'll have the money to bring in a decent supporting cast afterwards. I mean, who wouldn't want to play with LeBron? In New York?

                      If you really think that Cleveland has a "great" team then I don't know what to say. LeBron makes that team. Maurice Williams, Delonte West, Anderson Varejao, Ben Wallace, Wally Szczerbiak, Zydrunas Ilgauskas, J.J. Hickson, etc. I'm not seeing great there.

                      Comment

                      • CB4
                        Senior Member
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 4769

                        #12
                        Damn, I wanted to see this deal to go through. If it did Sac would look like a playoff team in the East.

                        Comment

                        • ryne candy
                          Aggie C/O '01
                          • Feb 2009
                          • 4355

                          #13
                          Originally posted by SuperNova854
                          Now that Cassell was cut, he can coach the Clippers and Mike Dumbleavy can rot in hell! yay
                          Rumor was the the Celtics might pick him back up at a lower cost after 30 days.....the trade was made because of the money he would have gotten in his current contract. I believe they have two spots available (Cassell's spot and O'Bryants spot).

                          Comment

                          • Youk
                            Posts too much
                            • Feb 2009
                            • 7998

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Lanteri87
                            If New York keeps Robinson, Lee, Chandler, and Gallinari around and add LeBron they'll have decent enough talent where it wouldn't be a huge difference.
                            Depends whether or not its even possible for them to keep Robinson and Lee. Supposedly its going to be a tight squeeze with Robinson and Lee both becoming FA's.

                            Comment

                            • Rayman
                              Spic 'n Spanish
                              • Feb 2009
                              • 4626

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Youk
                              Depends whether or not its even possible for them to keep Robinson and Lee. Supposedly its going to be a tight squeeze with Robinson and Lee both becoming FA's.
                              I love Lee (automatic double/double every night) but he can be more easily replaced. The last few weeks, it seems that Nate is transforming into a legit star before our eyes.

                              I hope there is some way to keep both, then we would only need one big name guy. And I don't think LeBron's supporting cast in Cleveland would be as good as what we would have in that case.



                              Comment

                              Working...