Kevin Garnett Re-Signs with Celtics
Collapse
X
-
Wow three years for that money.
Ouch. There goes a lot of flexibility in their roster moving forward. Do they still think there's a title window?Comment
-
Lol you're right cap flexibility in the NBA means absolutely nothing.
Christ, you're Boston, not Sacramento. Why do you assume big names wouldn't come to Boston? You could very easily (with money) get guys to play alongside Rondo and for a few more years Pierce. It's one of the most historic franchises in the NBA. I don't think you'd have a huge problem getting proven players to come if you have the money to give them. Instead Boston has chose to pay a 36-year old and a 34-year old a combined $27 million last year and $30 million in 13-14 before Pierce comes off the books.
Obviously Boston isn't getting a big name guy this year, but why do the 3 years?
You're going to pay big money for someone in his late 30s that despite an end of the year spike is physically breaking down. Not always the most wise move even if he is "a beast" The move to C gave him a quick boost but if you honestly think he's going to play like that for the rest of his contract you're lying to yourself.
I guess it depends how you want your Celtics to be going forward. I was under the impression it was a new guard, rebuilding around Rondo but its essentially an extension of The Big 3 but without Ray Allen (for now) that to me indicates they are still in a win-now mode. Short sighted thought in my mind, but hey he's "a beast"!Comment
-
I guess it depends how you want your Celtics to be going forward. I was under the impression it was a new guard, rebuilding around Rondo but its essentially an extension of The Big 3 but without Ray Allen (for now) that to me indicates they are still in a win-now mode. Short sighted thought in my mind, but hey he's "a beast"!
Plus, they have key young players coming back who were out last season, Avery Bradly and Jeff Green.
Its hard to form a contending team, theres no guarantee they will be back to contending if they start over with a brand new squad.
Note: 3 years is too long for KG, but they are probably counting on him retiring on his own before then.Comment
-
And Derrick Rose might not even play next season.Comment
-
I never knew Celtics fans were this delusional... now I know.
Chris Bosh's importance on the Heat >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Avery Bradley to the Celtics.Comment
-
If they are looking to try to contend for 2 or so more year though, chances are that for $10 mil. no one getting paid that much will help the team as much as KG is capable of doing.Comment
-
Lol you're right cap flexibility in the NBA means absolutely nothing.
Christ, you're Boston, not Sacramento. Why do you assume big names wouldn't come to Boston? You could very easily (with money) get guys to play alongside Rondo and for a few more years Pierce. It's one of the most historic franchises in the NBA. I don't think you'd have a huge problem getting proven players to come if you have the money to give them. Instead Boston has chose to pay a 36-year old and a 34-year old a combined $27 million last year and $30 million in 13-14 before Pierce comes off the books.
Obviously Boston isn't getting a big name guy this year, but why do the 3 years?
You're going to pay big money for someone in his late 30s that despite an end of the year spike is physically breaking down. Not always the most wise move even if he is "a beast" The move to C gave him a quick boost but if you honestly think he's going to play like that for the rest of his contract you're lying to yourself.
I guess it depends how you want your Celtics to be going forward. I was under the impression it was a new guard, rebuilding around Rondo but its essentially an extension of The Big 3 but without Ray Allen (for now) that to me indicates they are still in a win-now mode. Short sighted thought in my mind, but hey he's "a beast"!
I'd rather KG return so he can teach Melo and Sully, instead of investing in JaVale McGee or Chris Kaman.Comment
Comment