Nash vs Allen

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • G-men
    Posts too much
    • Nov 2011
    • 7579

    #16
    Originally posted by G-men
    The answer is Nash and this shouldn't even be a conversation.

    Comment

    • Argath
      $2 whore
      • Apr 2009
      • 9241

      #17
      Originally posted by Xixak
      And clearly your foresight is 20/200

      Clearly so is yours..



      Comment

      • Xixak
        Noob
        • Feb 2011
        • 600

        #18
        Originally posted by Argath
        Clearly so is yours..



        10ppg and 5rpg on 46% FG and 36% from 3 in 21 minutes? With an above average PER of 15.39?

        Lol you're a fucking fool I was correct. He would not have been able to get those kind of minutes in Miami lmao (I said he'd get around 25 in LA, which is almost spot on). And he was a solid contributor to the team in his role.

        Comment

        • Argath
          $2 whore
          • Apr 2009
          • 9241

          #19
          Originally posted by Xixak
          10ppg and 5rpg on 46% FG and 36% from 3 in 21 minutes? With an above average PER of 15.39?

          Lol you're a fucking fool I was correct. He would not have been able to get those kind of minutes in Miami lmao (I said he'd get around 25 in LA, which is almost spot on). And he was a solid contributor to the team in his role.
          Yea he's a "damn good 6th man getting 25+ min a game" nigga please. His numbers are incredibly skewed by him playing more when Dwight was out with injury. His numbers in the first half of the season were god awful when the lakers were playing their whole lineup

          And glad to see you were nice enough to round up on all his stats. He didnt average double digits in anything

          Comment

          • Xixak
            Noob
            • Feb 2011
            • 600

            #20
            Originally posted by Argath
            Yea he's a "damn good 6th man getting 25+ min a game" nigga please. His numbers are incredibly skewed by him playing more when Dwight was out with injury. His numbers in the first half of the season were god awful when the lakers were playing their whole lineup

            And glad to see you were nice enough to round up on all his stats. He didnt average double digits in anything
            - Umm what... His numbers weren't skewed lmao. He played a few more minutes (22) post ASB than pre ASB (20), but he still only started 6 games. His numbers in the first half of the season where 9-5 compared to 11-5 in the second half of the season (where he took 2 more shots per game). You are literally making stuff up lmao.

            - I pretty much always round stats so kill me for it lol

            Comment

            • Argath
              $2 whore
              • Apr 2009
              • 9241

              #21
              Originally posted by Xixak
              - Umm what... His numbers weren't skewed lmao. He played a few more minutes (22) post ASB than pre ASB (20), but he still only started 6 games. His numbers in the first half of the season where 9-5 compared to 11-5 in the second half of the season (where he took 2 more shots per game). You are literally making stuff up lmao.

              - I pretty much always round stats so kill me for it lol
              Awesome too bad the All Star break wasn't halfway through the season for the lakers. He averaged 7.67 PPG in the first half and 10.85 in the second half.

              All of this is irrelevant anyways I can make stats say whatever the hell I want. My roommate was a lakers fan, I watched a shit ton of lakers games this past season and he was actually also a huge Jamison fan when he was added to the team but even he will admit Jamison blew dick for most of the season. He was no where near a "great sixth man." I'm honestly surprised his numbers are as good as they are because he looked like a scrub whenever i actually watched him on TV. He always picked up garbage buckets when teams would double dwight in the post or play help D on Kobe.

              Comment

              • Xixak
                Noob
                • Feb 2011
                • 600

                #22
                Originally posted by Argath
                Awesome too bad the All Star break wasn't halfway through the season for the lakers. He averaged 7.67 PPG in the first half and 10.85 in the second half.

                All of this is irrelevant anyways I can make stats say whatever the hell I want. My roommate was a lakers fan, I watched a shit ton of lakers games this past season and he was actually also a huge Jamison fan when he was added to the team but even he will admit Jamison blew dick for most of the season. He was no where near a "great sixth man." I'm honestly surprised his numbers are as good as they are because he looked like a scrub whenever i actually watched him on TV. He always picked up garbage buckets when teams would double dwight in the post or play help D on Kobe.

                Well the one thing we can say FOR SURE is that Nash did not have a bigger impact than Ray Allen last year. Lololol

                Comment

                • Argath
                  $2 whore
                  • Apr 2009
                  • 9241

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Xixak
                  Well the one thing we can say FOR SURE is that Nash did not have a bigger impact than Ray Allen last year. Lololol
                  Nash had the better year statistically

                  But he was meh for a good amount of the season. So was ray ray. Outside of the big shot in the playoffs by ray neither really had a huge impact on their teams.

                  Comment

                  • Primetime
                    Thank You Prince
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 17526

                    #24
                    Originally posted by Argath
                    Nash had the better year statistically

                    But he was meh for a good amount of the season. So was ray ray. Outside of the big shot in the playoffs by ray neither really had a huge impact on their teams.
                    Outside of the Heat winning the championship, they didn't really hoist the Larry O'Brien trophy.

                    Comment

                    • Xixak
                      Noob
                      • Feb 2011
                      • 600

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Argath
                      Nash had the better year statistically

                      But he was meh for a good amount of the season. So was ray ray. Outside of the big shot in the playoffs by ray neither really had a huge impact on their teams.
                      Lol you're exactly like Vinsane. Twins.

                      Comment

                      • G-men
                        Posts too much
                        • Nov 2011
                        • 7579

                        #26
                        Add Xixak to the Aso list of people who just evaluate people by stats and not how they actually fucking play throughout the season.

                        Comment

                        • Villain
                          [REDACTED]
                          • May 2011
                          • 7768

                          #27
                          This was almost a decent threadbump before Xixak and Argath ruined it.
                          [REDACTED]

                          Comment

                          • Argath
                            $2 whore
                            • Apr 2009
                            • 9241

                            #28
                            Originally posted by Villain
                            This was almost a decent threadbump before Xixak and Argath ruined it.

                            Comment

                            Working...