How to Fill Out a Winning Bracket

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Primetime
    Thank You Prince
    • Nov 2008
    • 17526

    How to Fill Out a Winning Bracket

    I have four tried and true, nearly infallible rules that will help you win your NCAA pool or bracket contest.

    1) Your team must have a head coach who understands the difference between a fast break and a lunch break. Since 1980, Steve Fisher, who led Michigan to the 1989 title with the interim tag, is the only coach not already in the hall of fame—or probably headed there—to win a championship. You could argue the resumes of Tubby Smith, Nolan Richardson and Gary Williams, but I think they’ll eventually be in. The rest of the winners read like a who’s who of college coaches, including names like Crum, Thompson, Dean, Pitino, Calhoun, Tubby, Roy, Coach K, Roy and Donovan. Poor Wake Forest…

    2) You must have an animal in the paint that can devour opposing frontlines without regard for his wellbeing or safety. I’ll concede Arizona’s perimeter-oriented team from 1997, UConn’s Richard Hamilton-led upset of Duke in 1999 and the Carmelo Anthony-driven Syracuse triumph in 2003 as rule deviants. You won’t find a team since 1990—outside of those mentioned—that hasn’t had an all-conference caliber post player patrolling the paint. Sorry West Virginia, Boston College, Marquette, Villanova, Marland, Xavier, UCLA, Illinois and Syracuse, all clubs who lack such a big man this season.

    3) You must have an experienced point guard–freshman point guards don’t win national championships. Mike Bibby and Gerry McNamara are the only freshman point guards—ever—to lead their teams to a title. The curse struck Memphis hard last season. Despite Derrick Rose’s great play, the freshman missed a couple of free throws and eventually succumbed to this stone-cold rule.

    Thanks for playing Washington and Memphis. Kind of sucks for the Tigers—two years in a row that a freshman point guard will keep them from winning the title.

    4) An unwritten and very unscientific rule is that you must have three potential NBA players on your roster to compete. Not just guys who might get drafted, but players who will stick in the league. At first glance that might sound a bit farfetched, but again the rule proves to be true. Since 1990, only four teams that went on to win the championship, ’93 UNC, ’95 UCLA, ’99 UConn and ’03 Syracuse, have lacked at least three players to stick in the NBA. They’ve all had two. So, so long to Utah, Cleveland State, Dayton, North Dakota St., Michigan State, BYU, Texas A&M, Mississippi State, Missouri, Utah St, Cornell, California, Oklahoma State, Tennessee, Wisconsin, Butler, Arizona State, Temple and Clemson.

    So there you have it. One of the following five teams—Louisville, UConn, Pittsburgh, UNC or Gonzaga—will raise the nets in Detroit in April. I know that’s not exactly going out on a limb, but that is what the rules give us.

    Mark it down. Type it. Send it. Fax it. Ship it.
  • Hasselbeck
    Jus' bout dat action boss
    • Feb 2009
    • 6175

    #2
    You mean Cornell isn't going to win it all?

    Fuck this shit..

    *Tears up bracket*
    Originally posted by ram29jackson
    I already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SB

    Comment

    • SuperNova854
      Hobo Pride
      • Nov 2008
      • 8161

      #3
      He didnt say so long to USC. That means they going all the way babay!!!!

      1984 Record: 44-38 (9th in west)
      1985 Record: 42-40 (7th in west; 1st round exit)
      1986 Record: 51-31 (3rd in west; swept in finals)


      The Grizzlies theme this season should be : "This Season, We're Doing It For The Lulz"

      Comment

      • A Tasty Burgerr
        ▄█▀ █▬█ █ ▀█▀
        • Oct 2008
        • 5916

        #4
        Originally posted by Primetime232
        4) An unwritten and very unscientific rule is that you must have three potential NBA players on your roster to compete.
        I go by this alot in the later rounds

        Comment

        • mgoblue2290
          Posts too much
          • Feb 2009
          • 7174

          #5
          No offense, but this is pretty much common sense to anyone who watches March Madness yearly.

          Comment

          • chazmaniandevil
            Son of Hades
            • Nov 2008
            • 5792

            #6
            michigan st. too, i think they fit the criteria

            Comment

            • LC AAU
              Senior Member
              • Oct 2008
              • 14217

              #7
              of course UConn is gonna win.
              sig is too big, resize it

              Comment

              • The Messenger
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2008
                • 5063

                #8
                I picked UNC to beat UCONN in the finals. I'm a rebel.


                Click the banner above or below to visit the greatest chises on Earth!


                Comment

                • Primetime
                  Thank You Prince
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 17526

                  #9
                  Originally posted by mgoblue2290
                  No offense, but this is pretty much common sense to anyone who watches March Madness yearly.
                  No offense, but I didn't write this article. :club:

                  Comment

                  • Goober
                    Needs a hobby
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 12271

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Hasselbeck
                    You mean Cornell isn't going to win it all?

                    Fuck this shit..

                    *Tears up bracket*
                    Haha. I made a bracket for a pickem league with my friends, that has Cornell winning it all. "Andy Bernard's Big Red!!!!!"

                    Comment

                    • SuperNova854
                      Hobo Pride
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 8161

                      #11
                      I picked Oklahoma beating Wakeforest

                      1984 Record: 44-38 (9th in west)
                      1985 Record: 42-40 (7th in west; 1st round exit)
                      1986 Record: 51-31 (3rd in west; swept in finals)


                      The Grizzlies theme this season should be : "This Season, We're Doing It For The Lulz"

                      Comment

                      • Senser81
                        VSN Poster of the Year
                        • Feb 2009
                        • 12804

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Primetime232
                        1) Your team must have a head coach who understands the difference between a fast break and a lunch break. Since 1980, Steve Fisher, who led Michigan to the 1989 title with the interim tag, is the only coach not already in the hall of fame—or probably headed there—to win a championship. You could argue the resumes of Tubby Smith, Nolan Richardson and Gary Williams, but I think they’ll eventually be in. The rest of the winners read like a who’s who of college coaches, including names like Crum, Thompson, Dean, Pitino, Calhoun, Tubby, Roy, Coach K, Roy and Donovan. Poor Wake Forest…
                        LOL at Gary Williams going to the Hall of Fame. Tubby Smith is highly questionable, too. Jim Harrick (UCLA 95) more likely will end up in prison than the Hall of Fame.

                        Originally posted by Primetime232
                        2) You must have an animal in the paint that can devour opposing frontlines without regard for his wellbeing or safety. I’ll concede Arizona’s perimeter-oriented team from 1997, UConn’s Richard Hamilton-led upset of Duke in 1999 and the Carmelo Anthony-driven Syracuse triumph in 2003 as rule deviants. You won’t find a team since 1990—outside of those mentioned—that hasn’t had an all-conference caliber post player patrolling the paint. Sorry West Virginia, Boston College, Marquette, Villanova, Marland, Xavier, UCLA, Illinois and Syracuse, all clubs who lack such a big man this season.
                        UCLA 95 didn't really have an animal in the paint. Zidek was a joke, and O'Bannon was more of a finesse player. Pitino's Kentucky teams had a frontline of Mark Pope and Jared Prickett. Not exactly animals. 2000 Michigan State's worst players were there frontline players. Granger basically shot 3's, and Hutson and Anagonye were thugs. No post game whatsoever. And you've already mentioned Cuse, Zona, and UConn.

                        Originally posted by Primetime232
                        3) You must have an experienced point guard–freshman point guards don’t win national championships. Mike Bibby and Gerry McNamara are the only freshman point guards—ever—to lead their teams to a title. The curse struck Memphis hard last season. Despite Derrick Rose’s great play, the freshman missed a couple of free throws and eventually succumbed to this stone-cold rule.
                        LOL at the curse hitting Memphis hard. If anything, Memphis' run through the tourney last year proves this notion wrong. Rose was one of the best players in the tournament last year.

                        Originally posted by Primetime232
                        4) An unwritten and very unscientific rule is that you must have three potential NBA players on your roster to compete. Not just guys who might get drafted, but players who will stick in the league. At first glance that might sound a bit farfetched, but again the rule proves to be true. Since 1990, only four teams that went on to win the championship, ’93 UNC, ’95 UCLA, ’99 UConn and ’03 Syracuse, have lacked at least three players to stick in the NBA. They’ve all had two. So, so long to Utah, Cleveland State, Dayton, North Dakota St., Michigan State, BYU, Texas A&M, Mississippi State, Missouri, Utah St, Cornell, California, Oklahoma State, Tennessee, Wisconsin, Butler, Arizona State, Temple and Clemson.
                        I forgot the long and distinguished NBA careers guys like Bobby Hurley, Brian Davis, and Thomas Hill had for the 91-92 Duke teams. Florida recently won back-to-back titles without any good NBA guys. What 3 guys from the 94 Arkansas team stuck in the NBA?

                        Originally posted by Primetime232
                        So there you have it. One of the following five teams—Louisville, UConn, Pittsburgh, UNC or Gonzaga—will raise the nets in Detroit in April. I know that’s not exactly going out on a limb, but that is what the rules give us.
                        Gonzaga?

                        Comment

                        • Primetime
                          Thank You Prince
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 17526

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Senser81
                          LOL at Gary Williams going to the Hall of Fame. Tubby Smith is highly questionable, too. Jim Harrick (UCLA 95) more likely will end up in prison than the Hall of Fame.



                          UCLA 95 didn't really have an animal in the paint. Zidek was a joke, and O'Bannon was more of a finesse player. Pitino's Kentucky teams had a frontline of Mark Pope and Jared Prickett. Not exactly animals. 2000 Michigan State's worst players were there frontline players. Granger basically shot 3's, and Hutson and Anagonye were thugs. No post game whatsoever. And you've already mentioned Cuse, Zona, and UConn.



                          LOL at the curse hitting Memphis hard. If anything, Memphis' run through the tourney last year proves this notion wrong. Rose was one of the best players in the tournament last year.



                          I forgot the long and distinguished NBA careers guys like Bobby Hurley, Brian Davis, and Thomas Hill had for the 91-92 Duke teams. Florida recently won back-to-back titles without any good NBA guys. What 3 guys from the 94 Arkansas team stuck in the NBA?



                          Gonzaga?
                          Memphis didn't win the National Championship so it proves the notion correct. Florida has Brewer and Horford both have solid careers thus far, Noah is a starter for the Bulls. Florida had a great team.

                          It's hard to get it right for every single season but this is what you need the majority of the time.

                          Comment

                          • FirstTimer
                            Freeman Error

                            • Feb 2009
                            • 18729

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Senser81
                            Florida recently won back-to-back titles without any good NBA guys.
                            Al Horford is a good NBA player and IMO one of the up and coming post players in the NBA. But I agree with everything else.

                            Comment

                            • Senser81
                              VSN Poster of the Year
                              • Feb 2009
                              • 12804

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Primetime232
                              Memphis didn't win the National Championship so it proves the notion correct. Florida has Brewer and Horford both have solid careers thus far, Noah is a starter for the Bulls. Florida had a great team.

                              It's hard to get it right for every single season but this is what you need the majority of the time.
                              So Memphis making it to the Final and losing a close game and Derrick Rose being one of the best players in the tournament proves your notion correct? Wow. I wonder how many experienced backcourts didn't even make the tourney Final last year. My guess would be 63 teams.

                              I don't really disagree with the thought that experienced backcourts are an advantage, but I think Memphis is probably the worst example you could have chosen.

                              Noah is possibly the worst starter in the NBA. Florida did have a great team, but I don't think they had NBA superstars. Horford is a nice player, and IMO the stud on those Florida teams. But Noah and Brewer were supporting players, not NBA guys.

                              Comment

                              Working...