Brad Stevens is staying at Butler

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Chrispy
    Needs a hobby
    • Dec 2008
    • 11403

    Brad Stevens is staying at Butler

  • Warner2BruceTD
    2011 Poster Of The Year
    • Mar 2009
    • 26141

    #2
    He'd be a fool to leave.

    Unlike a guy like Jamie Dixon, Stevens is young and has a chance to become a Coach K/John Thompson/Jim Calhoun like figure by staying at one school for decades, establishing that school as a perennial power, and turning it into a CBB mecca.

    Short term he is leaving money on the table, but this is a wise long term investment on both his legacy and his wallet.

    Comment

    • Pitty
      Death, Taxes, Jeff Capel
      • Feb 2009
      • 7541

      #3
      Originally posted by Warner2BruceTD
      He'd be a fool to leave.

      Unlike a guy like Jamie Dixon, Stevens is young and has a chance to become a Coach K/John Thompson/Jim Calhoun like figure by staying at one school for decades, establishing that school as a perennial power, and turning it into a CBB mecca.

      Short term he is leaving money on the table, but this is a wise long term investment on both his legacy and his wallet.
      Wat? Dixon was roughly the same age as Stevens when he took over.

      Bad troll is bad.

      Comment

      • SuperKevin
        War Hero
        • Dec 2009
        • 8759

        #4
        He's saying Dixon now. Not Dixon when he took over at Pitt.

        At least I'm hoping that's what he meant

        Comment

        • jeffx
          Member
          • Jun 2009
          • 3853

          #5
          W2B stole my thunder. These days, coaches who turn around mid-majors can be set up for a long time. Brad Stevens and Shaka Smart are in good situations, and Butler will get even more exposure playing in the Big East at MSG. Why leave that for UCLA, where you might get fired if you don't win quickly?

          Comment

          • Pitty
            Death, Taxes, Jeff Capel
            • Feb 2009
            • 7541

            #6
            Originally posted by SuperKevin
            He's saying Dixon now. Not Dixon when he took over at Pitt.

            At least I'm hoping that's what he meant
            Either way, Dixon is still entrenched, and building the program as best he can. 5 more years in the tournament and Pitt will have more Tourney appearances under him than in their entire history prior to his hiring.

            Comment

            • NAHSTE
              Probably owns the site
              • Feb 2009
              • 22233

              #7
              Originally posted by Pitty
              Either way, Dixon is still entrenched, and building the program as best he can. 5 more years in the tournament and Pitt will have more Tourney appearances under him than in their entire history prior to his hiring.
              Doing it with Howland's players.

              Comment

              Working...