The Unpopular Opinion Thread
Collapse
X
-
W/less potential to make a living in basketball, you had to be more than exceptional to make that a career choice in the 50's & 60's. Only the elite of the elite were in the NBA. The league, in comparison, is watered down now. There are guys starting now that wouldn't get a camp invite back then.Comment
-
W/less potential to make a living in basketball, you had to be more than exceptional to make that a career choice in the 50's & 60's. Only the elite of the elite were in the NBA. The league, in comparison, is watered down now. There are guys starting now that wouldn't get a camp invite back then.Comment
-
Completely disagree. With less potential to make a living in basketball, you would have great college players choosing to go into other professions simply because they couldn't make a career out of playing professional basketball. Pro basketball players in the 50's and 60's made peanuts.
Three years before Jay Berwanger won the heisman, got drafted and didn't even sign a pro contract.
Most of those guys who played in the 50s and 60s had offseason jobs. These guys didn't work out year round like they did back in Jordan's day.Comment
-
Completely disagree. With less potential to make a living in basketball, you would have great college players choosing to go into other professions simply because they couldn't make a career out of playing professional basketball. Pro basketball players in the 50's and 60's made peanuts.
If you were on the Knicks in '65, you played the Lakers (West/Baylor) 10 times. You played Oscar Robertson 10 times. You played Russel's C's (w/5 HOF's) 10 times. You played Wilt 10 times. You played the Hawks (4 HOF's) 10 times. That's 50 of 80 games vs teams loaded w/all-time greats.
The teams were deeper in the 60's. In comparison, the NBA talent is diluted. We look @ teams w/3 superstars as loaded. Hawks had 4 headed to Springfield & finished 2nd in their division.Comment
Comment