32 Teams In 32 Days: Dallas Cowboys 2009 Preview

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rayman
    Spic 'n Spanish
    • Feb 2009
    • 4626

    #31
    Taking a sack when he could have thrown the ball into the stands. Committing a backbreaking intentional grounding penalty. Those were two HUGE plays.

    We'll see.. Roy Williams showed absolutely nothing in his first year as a Cowboy.. so he could just as easily flop as he can replace TO's production.
    Just a quick comment on these two;

    The intentional grounding penalty is one of two HUGE flags from that game that the league has since admitted was the wrong call.


    And I feel Williams' struggles last year were a perfect storm of coming to the team so late, while Romo was out, and never developing a rapport with him due to the injury, that never quite healed, all while playing third banana to TO and Witten.

    He'll be much better in '09.

    It was part of the reason. You could also argue the game doesn't even go overtime without Nick Folk's 52 yarder...
    That's not what I'm talking about and you know it. He also missed a kick before halftime.
    Last edited by Rayman; 06-30-2009, 03:02 PM.



    Comment

    • Rayman
      Spic 'n Spanish
      • Feb 2009
      • 4626

      #32
      Originally posted by Bikaben
      Read my comments. Seriously, I see the Division going this way. Redskins, Eagles and Giants have had BIG offseasons, well.. us and the Redskins moreso. But the Conboys lost a future Hal of Fame receiver, and they have an inconsistent QB. 9-7 at BEST. We'll easily win the 2 games against the Conboys. Yes, the Conboys. Read it and weep. Anyways dude, the division will go this way:

      NFC EAST
      Eagles- 11-5
      Giants-10-6
      Redskins-9-7
      Conboys-7-9/8-8

      Realism Conboy fans, embrace it.
      Games aren't won during free agency.



      Comment

      • G-men
        Posts too much
        • Nov 2011
        • 7579

        #33
        Originally posted by Bikaben
        Read my comments. Seriously, I see the Division going this way. Redskins, Eagles and Giants have had BIG offseasons, well.. us and the Redskins moreso. But the Conboys lost a future Hal of Fame receiver, and they have an inconsistent QB. 9-7 at BEST. We'll easily win the 2 games against the Conboys. Yes, the Conboys. Read it and weep. Anyways dude, the division will go this way:

        NFC EAST
        Eagles- 11-5
        Giants-10-6
        Redskins-9-7
        Conboys-7-9/8-8

        Realism Conboy fans, embrace it.
        you are a joke

        are you gonna go on about how the eagles ALMOST won two super bowls and how they would have won them IF the other two teams hadnt cheated.

        its funny how the capped words are always used in your arguments.

        Comment

        • G-men
          Posts too much
          • Nov 2011
          • 7579

          #34
          Originally posted by RayManHCP42

          I'll take that bet.

          What's your wager?
          my left nut

          Comment

          • Woy
            RIP West
            • Dec 2008
            • 16372

            #35
            Originally posted by Bikaben
            Read my comments. Seriously, I see the Division going this way. Redskins, Eagles and Giants have had BIG offseasons, well.. us and the Redskins moreso. But the Conboys lost a future Hal of Fame receiver, and they have an inconsistent QB. 9-7 at BEST. We'll easily win the 2 games against the Conboys. Yes, the Conboys. Read it and weep. Anyways dude, the division will go this way:

            NFC EAST
            Eagles- 11-5
            Giants-10-6
            Redskins-9-7
            Conboys-7-9/8-8

            Realism Conboy fans, embrace it.
            Are the Cowboys only going to go 7-9 cause Tony Romo has cancer?



            ^ Shouts to MvP for the sick sig. GFX TEAM BACK

            .

            Comment

            • Archer
              Go the fuck outside
              • Oct 2008
              • 15303

              #36
              Originally posted by Bikaben
              You moron. I use the capitals for emphasis. Or do you not know what emphasis is? And dude, I didn't mean the JJ thing that way. Now that I come to think of it, the cancer has no relevance to how he calls plays. But whatever. He was idiotic to stop blitzing when we came back with a 25-24 lead.
              lulz now that you think of it

              Comment

              • Hasselbeck
                Jus' bout dat action boss
                • Feb 2009
                • 6175

                #37
                Originally posted by Bikaben
                You moron. I use the capitals for emphasis. Or do you not know what emphasis is? And dude, I didn't mean the JJ thing that way. Now that I come to think of it, the cancer has no relevance to how he calls plays. But whatever. He was idiotic to stop blitzing when we came back with a 25-24 lead.
                Warner was playing so well in the last 3-4 games of the year that the only way you were going to beat him was to outscore him.

                The Steelers did that. No one else could.

                The health of your defensive coordinator, albeit a sad story, had nothing to do with this. No one in the NFC was playing better football in January than the Cardinals. End of story.
                Originally posted by ram29jackson
                I already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SB

                Comment

                Working...