Top 10 WR's In The NFL

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RosettaStoned
    Throbbing Tebowner
    • Oct 2008
    • 9949

    Originally posted by raiderfan7
    Ward >>>>> Holmes
    Nah, he just catches more ball in the Steelers offense. He's a possesion guy on a run first team.
    So, metaphorically speaking, our physiology basically has the universe mapped out and you're thinking it needs to be taught addition & subtraction.

    -Alan Aragon

    Comment

    • RosettaStoned
      Throbbing Tebowner
      • Oct 2008
      • 9949

      1. Larry Fitzgerald
      2. Andre Johnson
      3. Steve Smith
      4. Calvin Johnson
      5. Brandon Marshall
      7. Reggie Wayne
      8. Anquan Boldin
      9. Santonio Holmes
      10. Roddy White
      So, metaphorically speaking, our physiology basically has the universe mapped out and you're thinking it needs to be taught addition & subtraction.

      -Alan Aragon

      Comment

      • RosettaStoned
        Throbbing Tebowner
        • Oct 2008
        • 9949

        Originally posted by mtk
        Hines Ward isn't a hall of fame WR man, sorry.
        He'll finish with better numbers than Michael Irvin, who is in. Add in a superbowl MVP, he'll be in. Sorry.
        So, metaphorically speaking, our physiology basically has the universe mapped out and you're thinking it needs to be taught addition & subtraction.

        -Alan Aragon

        Comment

        • RosettaStoned
          Throbbing Tebowner
          • Oct 2008
          • 9949

          Originally posted by raiderfan7
          Santonio Holmes is better than Randy Moss now? News to me.
          I knew I was forgetting somebody.
          So, metaphorically speaking, our physiology basically has the universe mapped out and you're thinking it needs to be taught addition & subtraction.

          -Alan Aragon

          Comment

          • Chadman
            I Am Willie Beamen
            • Oct 2008
            • 1048

            irvin got in because he was a cowboy...that is all.

            Comment

            • RosettaStoned
              Throbbing Tebowner
              • Oct 2008
              • 9949

              Originally posted by mtk
              Irvin really doesn't belong.. And Ward really shouldn't be in either.. But yeah you're probably right, he'll be in eventually.. Like Irivn.

              It's just that the term "hall-of-fame player" makes one think first ballot, not a Thurman Thomas type.. Which I'm sure was the effect you were going for.
              Didn't Mike get in first ballot? Either way, the effect I was going for, is that he's playing with WR that will be in the HOF, along with a pro bowl TE, on a running team. We saw what happens when he's the #1 guy.
              So, metaphorically speaking, our physiology basically has the universe mapped out and you're thinking it needs to be taught addition & subtraction.

              -Alan Aragon

              Comment

              • RosettaStoned
                Throbbing Tebowner
                • Oct 2008
                • 9949

                Originally posted by raiderfan7
                But ultimately what you're saying is that he is playing behind a guy not in your top 10, but is still a top 10 receiver.
                Willie Parker used to play behind Jerome bettis, but was a better back.
                So, metaphorically speaking, our physiology basically has the universe mapped out and you're thinking it needs to be taught addition & subtraction.

                -Alan Aragon

                Comment

                • Leftwich
                  Bring on the Season

                  • Oct 2008
                  • 13700

                  Originally posted by Chadman
                  irvin got in because he was a cowboy...that is all.
                  Bullshit! He made it in because he did something that not a lot of WR's do now a days. He got physical no matter what. Had he never been injured he would have had an even better resume to get into the HOF. Doing things that aren't necessarily in your job description makes you a better player than the one who just runs out there and catches.

                  I'm not gonna go into an argument of why I think Irvin is a HOFer. He deserves to be in there end of story.

                  Originally posted by Tailback U
                  It won't say shit, because dying is for pussies.

                  Comment

                  • RosettaStoned
                    Throbbing Tebowner
                    • Oct 2008
                    • 9949

                    Originally posted by raiderfan7
                    Before Willie Parker developed yeah. Not the same.
                    More like before Willie got a shot.
                    So, metaphorically speaking, our physiology basically has the universe mapped out and you're thinking it needs to be taught addition & subtraction.

                    -Alan Aragon

                    Comment

                    • KINGOFOOTBALL
                      Junior Member
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 10343

                      Irvin= Most dominant WR not named Rice for a long period of time in the 90s.

                      Sharpe and Carter have there backers and rightfully so. Pun intended Irvin was a playmaker. 3 superbowls and the guy was an all time great big game performer.
                      Too many people have this delusional idea that all he did was muscle some guy and catch a short pass and fall down. The guy was unstoppable in intermediate routes better than any WR since then. Was fantastic at the deep ball and running after the catch. His YPC is higher than deep ball Randy Moss and almost 3 yards a catch higher than Marvin Harrison.
                      Going against Darrel Green , Aenas Williams , Eric Allen 6 times a season and routinely facing the eras toughest defenses multi times a year makes him a HOF player.
                      If he could chew up defenses facing tougher rules , MUCH tougher CBs , and top 10 defenses 6 times a year knocking his credentials belittles any WR today who have cupcake secondaries in front of them.

                      Hines Ward is a great player , very good WR. But he isnt top 10 anymore , nor has he been in the discussion or level of dominance as the leagues best the way Irvin was.
                      They do however have similar physical styles ,unselfish play , and championship resumes.

                      At the end of they day much as I love the guy I likely wouldnt put him(Ward) in the top 3 best WRs of the decade. Moss/TO/Harrison/Holt would be in before him.
                      Youd be delusional to not put Irvin in the top 3 wrs of the 90s.


                      Lastly anyone putting Santonio Holmes over Moss as to be under the influence.
                      Putting Ward top 10 is being sentimental.
                      Best reason to have a license.

                      Comment

                      • Chadman
                        I Am Willie Beamen
                        • Oct 2008
                        • 1048

                        Originally posted by Leftwich
                        Bullshit! He made it in because he did something that not a lot of WR's do now a days. He got physical no matter what. Had he never been injured he would have had an even better resume to get into the HOF. Doing things that aren't necessarily in your job description makes you a better player than the one who just runs out there and catches.

                        I'm not gonna go into an argument of why I think Irvin is a HOFer. He deserves to be in there end of story.
                        omg leftwich it was a joke. i was trying to make the idiot made..he didnt bite.

                        And hell...no mention of andre rison? He was good as shit in the 90s as well. Has better numbers than irvin..and they both were asshats off the field..lol.

                        Comment

                        • RosettaStoned
                          Throbbing Tebowner
                          • Oct 2008
                          • 9949

                          Originally posted by packabacka19
                          Holmes is not a top 10 WR. He had an awesome Super Bowl, but compare his stats to those of Roddy White (who you had behind Holmes) and Greg Jennings (who you did not list).

                          Holmes - 55 catches - 821 yards - 54.7 yards/game - 14.9 yards/catch - 5 TDs
                          White - 88 catches - 1382 yards - 86.4 yards/game - 15.7 yards/catch - 7 TDs
                          Jennings - 80 catches - 1292 yards - 80.8 yards/game - 16.2 yards/catch - 9 TDs

                          How can you say Holmes is better than those 2?
                          Again, stats do not tell the whole story. The only reason his numbers were huge in the superbowl is because Hines wasn't a factor. If he's the number 1 guy, he will put up big numbers. He makes huge, clutch plays all year long. I would take him over all but a handful of receivers in the league, including Owens, and White.
                          So, metaphorically speaking, our physiology basically has the universe mapped out and you're thinking it needs to be taught addition & subtraction.

                          -Alan Aragon

                          Comment

                          • RosettaStoned
                            Throbbing Tebowner
                            • Oct 2008
                            • 9949

                            BTW, White's numbers mean dick to me, because he's playing against JV defenses all year.
                            So, metaphorically speaking, our physiology basically has the universe mapped out and you're thinking it needs to be taught addition & subtraction.

                            -Alan Aragon

                            Comment

                            • RosettaStoned
                              Throbbing Tebowner
                              • Oct 2008
                              • 9949

                              Originally posted by packabacka19
                              Like who?
                              The Rams, The Chiefs... etc... Most of the teams he plays are ranked 20 or below in team defense.
                              So, metaphorically speaking, our physiology basically has the universe mapped out and you're thinking it needs to be taught addition & subtraction.

                              -Alan Aragon

                              Comment

                              • Senser81
                                VSN Poster of the Year
                                • Feb 2009
                                • 12804

                                Originally posted by KINGOFOOTBALL
                                Irvin= Most dominant WR not named Rice for a long period of time in the 90s.

                                Sharpe and Carter have there backers and rightfully so. Pun intended Irvin was a playmaker. 3 superbowls and the guy was an all time great big game performer.
                                Too many people have this delusional idea that all he did was muscle some guy and catch a short pass and fall down. The guy was unstoppable in intermediate routes better than any WR since then. Was fantastic at the deep ball and running after the catch. His YPC is higher than deep ball Randy Moss and almost 3 yards a catch higher than Marvin Harrison.
                                Going against Darrel Green , Aenas Williams , Eric Allen 6 times a season and routinely facing the eras toughest defenses multi times a year makes him a HOF player.
                                If he could chew up defenses facing tougher rules , MUCH tougher CBs , and top 10 defenses 6 times a year knocking his credentials belittles any WR today who have cupcake secondaries in front of them.

                                Hines Ward is a great player , very good WR. But he isnt top 10 anymore , nor has he been in the discussion or level of dominance as the leagues best the way Irvin was.
                                They do however have similar physical styles ,unselfish play , and championship resumes.

                                At the end of they day much as I love the guy I likely wouldnt put him(Ward) in the top 3 best WRs of the decade. Moss/TO/Harrison/Holt would be in before him.
                                Youd be delusional to not put Irvin in the top 3 wrs of the 90s.


                                Lastly anyone putting Santonio Holmes over Moss as to be under the influence.
                                Putting Ward top 10 is being sentimental.

                                Good post...agree with everything (except IMO Sharpe > Irvin)

                                Comment

                                Working...