No. The only other country that should get an NFL team is Canada. Toronto would be a great market.
Commish still wants a real team in London
Collapse
X
-
The Commish believed the stupid crap that rush Limbaugh was rumored to say. He cant be that bright.Comment
-
Originally posted by Mattif they didnt care about American Football, why is the game on Sunday sold out?Comment
-
Originally posted by blitzriqueHave you heard how this game is being sold in the UK? LMAO, talk about putting lipstick on the pig known as the TB Bucs. I heard an ad saying that the game would feature "two teams likely headed for the playoffs"........?????????????????????
Here is my semi-related NSFW WTF pic:
http://marvin.hb0da.org/~beavis/archive/files/wtf.jpg
But like killgod said, even if there is interest enough to fill a stadium, on top of everything else, I doubt the TV revenue would be enough.Originally posted by mgoblue2290If you want to win, put Drew in.Comment
-
I think you're insulting some of the UK's NFL fans. There's a solid amount of NFL fans over there, definitely enough to fill Wembley without cheap PR for it.
But like killgod said, even if there is interest enough to fill a stadium, on top of everything else, I doubt the TV revenue would be enough.
Also, British sports fans love nothing more than history and tradition; we don't tend to take kindly to "plastic" franchises springing up. A game against the 49ers would see more locals turning up in red and gold than in London's colours.
It's a non-starter of an idea and it would completely humiliate the NFL (or maybe just Goodell if he was properly lined up as the scapegoat in advance). First game would be an 80,000 sell out, second game would be three-quarters full, third would be half-full. After the fourth game Sky Sports would realise that people would rather see a decent game between two contenders at a full stadium and pull coverage in favour of a Colts-Pats game. Then, after slipping to the expansion standard of 0-6 they'd stop showing the results on the news and the papers would start ripping into the whole debacle.
Wembley would throw the team out in their second season because they're losing money opening it up for 15,000 supporters here and there and they'd be forced to move to somewhere like Upton Park or The Valley...which becomes even more embarrassing to see half empty.
Third season they'd go on tour, playing each game in a different city to try and drum up support but no one's interested. They can't even attract any mediocre free agents and all their decent draftees are just counting the days until they can leave.
There wouldn't be a fourth season.Z(u, w) = Z0(w)[1-exp{-b(w)u}]
...and she said "Well I don't think you're a fishmonger. I think you've done a plop in the wrong lavatory."Comment
-
Comment
-
But yeah .... it's a terrible idea for many many many reasonsComment
-
Originally posted by blitzriqueHave you heard how this game is being sold in the UK? LMAO, talk about putting lipstick on the pig known as the TB Bucs. I heard an ad saying that the game would feature "two teams likely headed for the playoffs"........?????????????????????
Here is my semi-related NSFW WTF pic:
http://marvin.hb0da.org/~beavis/archive/files/wtf.jpg
"The re-building Tampa Bay Bucs v The Powerhouse Patriots"
"The Bucs v The Manchester United of american sports"
"The Bucs v the most succesful team in recent nfl history"
The pats have the second or third biggest fanbase in the UK ..... every bit of media focus has been on the Pats
Plus the people over here aren't idiots when it comes to who is good and who isin't. They do get 3 games on sundays + NFLTA + NFL Gameday so it's not like everybody can't see the Bucs are horrible .....Last edited by Archer; 10-24-2009, 07:07 AM.Comment
-
Originally posted by BritrockNFL Europe didn't survive because who wants to watch a bunch of NFL rejects playing second rate football? A real NFL franchise might have a chance of surviving, given proper support.
My thoughts are changing on this slowly, if they hold 2 games here next year and build the support up over time, it could be a plausible idea. They're obviously not going to move a team here next year, or open an expansion team any time soon. But look at the Jaguars, they're averaging less than 45,000 for their home games. I'm pretty sure they could beat that in London over a season.
Invest some money in building the grassroots over here, get some English players in the team, or league, and you've got yourself a recipe for success.
There's a lot of hostility here towards American Football, similar to soccer in the States. Add to that the fact that both the British people and the press love nothing more than to see something go tits up. Just look at the Olympics, if they'd put the choice of slogan up for a public vote it would have been "London 2012: It's Going To Be Shit!"
We love a moan and we love to have a gloat at a nice, big fuck up.
Ok, there's enough of us fans in the UK to make a once-a-year showcase a success but are fans from Newcastle or Glasgow really going to make 8 separate trips to London in the run-up to Christmas?
I think the NFL has more pressing matters on its hands before it starts worrying about putting franchises or Superbowls in London. How about putting a franchise in a US city that is begging for one; rather than a city with about 20 football league teams, four top flight rugby teams, two first class cricket counties and Test venues and countless other world renowned championships. And before they even think about playing a Superbowl in Wembley at 2am in the driving drizzle/rain/sleet they need to start putting them in places that have actually earned them like Chicago, New York or Green Bay.
Christ, a regular season game in Germany would be a good start, they're mad for the sport over there.Z(u, w) = Z0(w)[1-exp{-b(w)u}]
...and she said "Well I don't think you're a fishmonger. I think you've done a plop in the wrong lavatory."Comment
-
It'd be a terrible idea, and that's why ultimately it will never happen.
Just because Goodell wants it doesn't mean it will go down..Originally posted by ram29jacksonI already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SBComment
-
Originally posted by blitzriqueSo, yes. Get ready for the London Shaguars. Or the English Muffins. Or the Britain Dental School Dropouts.
That'd be worth about a month of publicity.Z(u, w) = Z0(w)[1-exp{-b(w)u}]
...and she said "Well I don't think you're a fishmonger. I think you've done a plop in the wrong lavatory."Comment
-
I think it could be done, but not quickly... and not London first. Berlin or Tokyo (MAYBE Dublin if the ticket prices were kept low) would be far better candidates. The game is more popular in those countries than in England.
Clearly the NFL is interested in expanding overseas, but I tend to agree with the flock here... the first out-of-US move has got to be Canada (though I think that's in the works, it's just not newsworthy). San Francisco vs. Arizona sold out Aztica, and both teams were terrible at the time, so maybe Mexico is a solid candidate too (though I think international relations and the combination of corruption and poverty are probably deterrents to the NFL).
LOL @ The English Muffins, btw. I think if they DO put a team there, they should stick with local naming conventions. London AFF. I can't imagine London Royals or British Knights necessarily going over well (didn't mean to reference the shoes, just coming up with appropriate examples). NFL teams aren't clubs, so the second "F" stands for Franchise.Last edited by adembroski; 10-26-2009, 12:42 PM.S.P.Q.A.
Comment
Comment