If UGA hires a good DC and Murray is as good as he is supposed to be, next year could be VERY special
Clean, Old-Fashioned Hate.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by HokieWould have been better if Murray had a year under his belt. It could very well happen, but Florida is still going to be a top 5 program and Tennessee is only getting better.
Florida will be down for a year. The will lose Tebow and Spikes (their two leaders) along with the rest of their seniors and also potentially 7-8 juniors. Tennessee will be better but the only reason they beat us was because our DC couldnt defend a bootleg. Our DC won't be here next year :rockwoot:Comment
-
Love that sig, nash. Ealey could be a VERY special player next year and the year after that. My god.
I do wish that we had gotten Murray some experience this year, but at least he still has all 4 years of eligibility left. Not a terrible tradeoff.Comment
-
I dont think Dunlap and Haden will return with all the changes to the NFL.
Lot of top juniors going to be coming out for a bigger paycheck.Comment
-
Originally posted by HokieNo way UF is down. They will have a much better offense next year which will include the nation's best offensive line to give Brantley some time. Bostic will be just as good if not better than Spikes. Andre Debose also comes back from injury and will fill in for the Harvin position they needed this year. And I'm pretty sure Dunlap is coming back with a possibility that Haden returns as well.
And dont say they won a NC in 2006 with Chris Leak. Their defense won that NC
Florida won't be down long, it will be like 2007 without Tebow.Last edited by Nash; 11-29-2009, 08:05 PM.Comment
-
G-Tech has played above their talent level, and their defense isn't good at all, so it shouldn't be that big of a surprise for a midlevel SEC team to beat a top ACC team (the ACC is garbage).
I don't know if Mark Richt is a genius or a criminal. He's obviously fighting for his job after yet another year of underachievement, and the only way Georgia would lose to Tech is if Tech's offense simply outscored Georgia's. So, good work by Georgia to, IMO, intentionally injure Nesbitt early in the game. Tech never really recovered, because they lost basically an entire quarter of offensive production without Nesbitt. They also tried to take out Thomas by impaling him onto the yardage marker 5 yards out of bounds. Weak sauce.Comment
-
G-Tech has played above their talent level, and their defense isn't good at all, so it shouldn't be that big of a surprise for a midlevel SEC team to beat a top ACC team (the ACC is garbage).
I don't know if Mark Richt is a genius or a criminal. He's obviously fighting for his job after yet another year of underachievement, and the only way Georgia would lose to Tech is if Tech's offense simply outscored Georgia's. So, good work by Georgia to, IMO, intentionally injure Nesbitt early in the game. Tech never really recovered, because they lost basically an entire quarter of offensive production without Nesbitt. They also tried to take out Thomas by impaling him onto the yardage marker 5 yards out of bounds. Weak sauce.
Are you kidding me? Are you seriously saying Richt intentionally told his players to injure Nesbitt?! And if he did, why wait till the second quarter???
It was just a play where Nesbitt got tackled awkwardly and got hurt. Completely incidental. Also they lost a whole quarter of production? He was out two drives. With the first drive ending in a score for Tech and the second drive being a whopping one play.
Also compare this, Nesbitt being out 2 drives in the second quarter or AJ Green (the best WR in the SEC, maybe the country) and Bacarri Rambo (arguably the best DB on our team) being out for the whole game.Last edited by Nash; 11-30-2009, 02:58 PM.Comment
-
-
Are you kidding me? Are you seriously saying Richt intentionally told his players to injure Nesbitt?! And if he did, why wait till the second quarter???
It was just a play where Nesbitt got tackled awkwardly and got hurt. Completely incidental. Also they lost a whole quarter of production? He was out two drives. With the first drive ending in a score for Tech and the second drive being a whopping one play.
Just my $0.02. I could be wrong.Comment
-
Did you see the play? Bending him backwards well after the whistle is what hurt him. It could have been incidental, but I didn't think so at the time. And the cheap shot on Thomas can only be described as "intent to injure", no? It seemed like there was a lot of bad blood during the game, and it appeared to me that Georgia really had nothing to lose by playing "aggressive".
Just my $0.02. I could be wrong.
^ Shouts to MvP for the sick sig. GFX TEAM BACK
.Comment
-
Did you see the play? Bending him backwards well after the whistle is what hurt him. It could have been incidental, but I didn't think so at the time. And the cheap shot on Thomas can only be described as "intent to injure", no? It seemed like there was a lot of bad blood during the game, and it appeared to me that Georgia really had nothing to lose by playing "aggressive".
Just my $0.02. I could be wrong.
On the Thomas play, it was definitely a late hit. Late hits have been a problem all year but it wasnt trying to harm Thomas. Our player was tackling him late and then Bryan Evans came late and couldn't slow down fast enough and ran into both of them. This caused the tackle to go sideways into the first down marker. Nothing more, nothing lessComment
-
-
I wouldn't be surprised if Willie was just helping out as the least he could do.Comment
Comment