Trading Calvin Johnson

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mgoblue2290
    Posts too much
    • Feb 2009
    • 7174

    Trading Calvin Johnson

    The local sports radio station has been debating this the past couple of days. They think that trading Calvin would help out the Lions more than it would hurt them. Obviously we would trade him for draft picks and they were saying we could get a 1, 2, 3 this year or maybe a first this year and the following year and some other picks this year.

    Personally, I agree with them. Keeping Calvin here does absolutely nothing for this team other than help get other receivers open. He had a good year last year but we went 0-16, so he wasn't exactly winning us games. Trading Calvin will allow us to draft more good players, especially on defense. It may hurt Staffords numbers but I think building our defense is more important than that.

    I think teams like the Giants, Ravens, Dolphins, and maybe the Redskins would be interested.

    What do you think?
  • mgoblue2290
    Posts too much
    • Feb 2009
    • 7174

    #2
    Thing is, his contract is up after the 2011 season I believe. We'll have to pay him a boatload of money, probably more than any other WR in the league. Plus he may not even resign, so at least this way we'll get something for him. Also, we probably won't be competing for the playoffs in 2011, we'll be a 5-6 win team by then.

    Comment

    • EmpireWF
      Giants in the Super Bowl
      • Mar 2009
      • 24082

      #3
      You're taking the 'we lost with him, we can lose without him' approach.

      Thing is, once you take him out of the Lions offense, they become downright disgusting. Teams can do whatever they want since you don't have a good runningback and no real #2, let alone a #1 to replace him with.


      I don't know any team that would give up a 1, 2 & 3 this year, and two future first round picks to get him.

      If you trade him, you're probably looking at 2 first round picks max.


      Comment

      • Nukleopatra
        Posts a lot
        • Nov 2008
        • 4365

        #4
        This guy is about as overrated as Larry Fitzgerald.

        Trade him.

        Comment

        • mgoblue2290
          Posts too much
          • Feb 2009
          • 7174

          #5
          Originally posted by EmpireWF
          You're taking the 'we lost with him, we can lose without him' approach.

          Thing is, once you take him out of the Lions offense, they become downright disgusting. Teams can do whatever they want since you don't have a good runningback and no real #2, let alone a #1 to replace him with.


          I don't know any team that would give up a 1, 2 & 3 this year, and two future first round picks to get him.

          If you trade him, you're probably looking at 2 first round picks max.
          It would be 1 2 3 or two first rounders.

          Comment

          • Buzzman
            Senior Member
            • Oct 2008
            • 6659

            #6
            If they traded him, I'd quit. You honestly think that would help, your downright stupid. Look at the games when he doesnt play, were downright worse on offense then the Cleveland Browns. But by all means trade a proven star WR for a chance that you might draft well.

            BTW Hes not overrated.

            Comment

            • Prodigal Son
              The Greatest
              • Feb 2009
              • 2338

              #7
              lol, trade your best player because resigning him might be expensive, but drafting another WR will cost you more then it would to resign him.

              Comment

              • Argath
                $2 whore
                • Apr 2009
                • 9241

                #8
                CJ sells tickets


                NFL is a business first, remember that

                Comment

                • mgoblue2290
                  Posts too much
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 7174

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Prodigal Son
                  lol, trade your best player because resigning him might be expensive, but drafting another WR will cost you more then it would to resign him.
                  That wouldn't be them main reason just something to consider. The main reason is to load up on draft picks and build up our defense and offensive line.

                  Comment

                  • Tengo Juego
                    Posts a lot
                    • Jun 2009
                    • 4289

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Nukleopatra
                    This guy is about as overrated as Larry Fitzgerald.

                    Comment

                    • krulmichael
                      STRAAAAANGE MUSIC!
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 10721

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Buzzman
                      If they traded him, I'd quit. You honestly think that would help, your downright stupid. Look at the games when he doesnt play, were downright worse on offense then the Cleveland Browns. But by all means trade a proven star WR for a chance that you might draft well.

                      BTW Hes not overrated.
                      Nail on the head. It was hard enough last year when we traded Roy away (mainly cause he was one of my favorite players), but if they give Megatron away I'm seriously done with the Lions.

                      My reaction to this is simply:

                      :stone:

                      Twitch Channel
                      http://www.twitch.tv/krulmichael20


                      Season I: 10-6 (NFC North Champions)
                      Season II: 9-7 (NFC North Champions)
                      Season III: 13-3 (NFC Champions)
                      Season IV: 11-5 (NFC North Champions)
                      Season V: 2-1

                      Comment

                      • Len B
                        :moonwalk:
                        • Oct 2008
                        • 13598

                        #12
                        lolololol

                        Let's take a WR when we suck and have no QB, and once we get a QB with a strong arm let's trade away said WR.

                        Sounds like a brilliant strategy. If you wanted defense, you should have traded down and taken Aaron Curry.

                        Comment

                        • Sven Draconian
                          Not a Scandanavian
                          • Feb 2009
                          • 1319

                          #13
                          Worst. Thread. Ever.

                          You would have to be retarded to trade Calvin Johnson. He's top 5 at his position, he's young (5 productive seasons left minimum). What are you going to get from the draft that is better than a young player proven to be top 5 at his position? Isn't that what you aim to draft in the first place?

                          Since the draft is a crapshoot anyway, you are just as likely to end up with a bust (a complete cap drain) and a solid starter. For more money then you would pay CJ.

                          I'm expecting him to be a Redskin shortly.

                          Comment

                          • nesper
                            Junior Member
                            • Feb 2009
                            • 648

                            #14
                            Originally posted by mgoblue2290
                            The local sports radio station has been debating this the past couple of days. They think that trading Calvin would help out the Lions more than it would hurt them. Obviously we would trade him for draft picks and they were saying we could get a 1, 2, 3 this year or maybe a first this year and the following year and some other picks this year.

                            Personally, I agree with them. Keeping Calvin here does absolutely nothing for this team other than help get other receivers open. He had a good year last year but we went 0-16, so he wasn't exactly winning us games. Trading Calvin will allow us to draft more good players, especially on defense. It may hurt Staffords numbers but I think building our defense is more important than that.

                            I think teams like the Giants, Ravens, Dolphins, and maybe the Redskins would be interested.

                            What do you think?
                            this is one of those weeks were there is absolutely nothing to talk about in town so valenti and foster just drum up some stupid shit to get some calls. Its absolutely stupid to dump Cj for draft picks when you need him to help develop stafford and pettigrew. On top of that nobody knows what is going to happen post 2010. next year is uncapped and who knows where they go form there so speculating on payroll is just rediculous.

                            I've started to tire on valenti even though when he first hit the radio it was a breath of fresh air in this meeechigan centric area where your other option was stoney and wojo both who were permantly on thier knees for michigan. Today for example talking about the mcshay mock. not even 6 months ago everyone on his board and him included were gerald mccoy needs to be the pick. now its we cant get suh were shit out of luck. its rediculous.

                            Comment

                            • Deviant
                              Yes, please.
                              • Nov 2008
                              • 2861

                              #15
                              The New Jersey Nets strategy. Yeah, have fun with that.


                              Back at it, yet again. Sign up here!

                              Comment

                              Working...