Hakeem Nicks Vs. Percy Harvin Vs. Kenny Britt

[hoodyallen]

collie is DQ'ed cuz peyton manning could make limas sweed into a viable wide out.

nicks has the big play ability, but like OOBL said his hands in traffic and on routine catches is bad. i would go harvin, britt then nicks. but to be honest the homer in me says mike wallace is better than them all.

Mike Wallace is going to be a great slot guy for the next 4-6 years. He reminds me a ton of Steve Breaston, only Wallace is faster, more explosive, and more of a deep threat. Breaston definitely has better hands though, Wallace seems to drop a lot of passes.

[Len B]

Nicks is going to be the best of the three. He has the size that Percy lacks, and he has the spectacular catch ability that I don't think Britt has just yet.

There's something special about the guy; He took games over at UNC and despite getting slowed to start his career, he's still having ball out games and looking like a force for years.

[Tengo Juego]

I've only seen Harvin in action.

[Rush]

Devin Aromashodu > All.

But really I would say Percy Harvin just based off his athleticism alone.

[hoodyallen]

Devin Aromashodu > All.

But really I would say Percy Harvin just based off his athleticism alone.

So Josh Cribbs is a top flight receiver?

[Gonzo]

So Josh Cribbs is a top flight receiver?

I must have missed the part in the OP where we were considering any of these rookies to be top flight receivers.

[hoodyallen]

I must have missed the part in the OP where we were considering any of these rookies to be top flight receivers.

None of them are. I missed the part where we started judging WR's on athleticism. If you had understood my post, you would have got that since Rush values athleticism so highly, that Cribbs should be a top flight WR due to his incredible athleticism. It was obviously sarcastic.

[Gonzo]

1. Which receiver would you rather have now?

2. Which receiver has the highest ceiling?

3. Which receiver is most likely to reach their ceiling?

None of them are. I missed the part where we started judging WR's on athleticism. If you had understood my post, you would have got that since Rush values athleticism so highly, that Cribbs should be a top flight WR due to his incredible athleticism. It was obviously sarcastic.

There's really not all that much not to understand in the first post. Your sarcasm was lost on me due to the fact that Harvin is tremendously gifted athletically, and its not something you can discount.