Ravens need a number two. Not a slot receiver. Claytons inconsistent ass is better suited as the teams third receiver.
Citizens of Baltimore, cross streets with caution.
Collapse
X
-
There's a difference. Whether you agree or not, Vick did those things and knew what he was doing and denied, Stallworth didn't.
Stallworth was stupid and made the mistake of drinking and driving. And he was responsible for what he did. But, he wasn't a bitch about it(remember, Vick denied what he did at first) and didn't deny that he was drinking and driving, didn't run from the scene, and honestly, the family getting compensation is probably better than having him locked up for a lengthy period. As crude or heartless as that may seem to anyone.
IIRC, Stallworth had his license revoked for life. And will be on probation for a long fucking time, in addition to house arrest. And, FWIW, was out of work for a whole year. A job that pays like no other.
I'm not justifying what he did. I guess I just dont care for cheap jokes.
Again, not justifying, just hammering out some differences here.Comment
-
As I said, ideally we sign/trade for a legitimate #1, Derrick Mason doesn't retire and comes back as the #2, and then we have Kelley Washington and Stallworth as the 3/4, interchangeable. Draft someone like Gresham or Benn with our first pick, and our passing offense isn't so much shit anymore...it could be pretty damn good, actually.
Unfortunately, I doubt things unfold that way.Comment
-
-
Originally posted by GianfrancowilletVick did his time.. Stallworth paid his way out of trouble.. That's the difference.
And, again, FWIW Stallworth did do time. 24 days I believe.Comment
-
There's a difference. Whether you agree or not, Vick did those things and knew what he was doing and denied, Stallworth didn't.
Stallworth was stupid and made the mistake of drinking and driving. And he was responsible for what he did. But, he wasn't a bitch about it(remember, Vick denied what he did at first) and didn't deny that he was drinking and driving, didn't run from the scene, and honestly, the family getting compensation is probably better than having him locked up for a lengthy period. As crude or heartless as that may seem to anyone.
IIRC, Stallworth had his license revoked for life. And will be on probation for a long fucking time, in addition to house arrest. And, FWIW, was out of work for a whole year. A job that pays like no other.
I'm not justifying what he did. I guess I just dont care for cheap jokes.Originally posted by GianfrancowilletVick did his time.. Stallworth paid his way out of trouble.. That's the difference.
The guy who Stallworth hit ran in front of the car trying to catch a bus. He could have killed him if he was sober as well. Stallworth handled the situation very well IMO.
Comment
-
Stallworth didn't go to jail for killing the guy. He went to jail for operating a vehicle while intoxicated.
If he were punished for the manslaughter, he'd still be there and would be for a while.
What he did is still incredibly stupid any way you slice it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GianfrancowilletI'm sure there's quite a few people that are sitting in jail on vehicular manslaughter charges that "could have done the same thing sober". The only difference is they didn't have the hush money to get off. Are you trying to say to me that Stallworth didn't know he had drank before he got behind the wheel?Comment
-
Yea but when Stallworth got behind the wheel he didn't think to himself "I'm going to kill something today." There was not intent.
While Vick knew he was going to be killing things and he still did it and then denied it when he was caught.
Vick had intent to take lives, Stallworth didn't.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GianfrancowilletBut the only reason he wasn't tried for manslaughter is because he paid off the family members of the guy he hit.
Wasn't the guy wandering aimlessly (and drunk himself) across a busy highway?
I don't want it to sound like I'm feeling pity for Stallworth, because I'm not. Driving drunk is one of the dumbest things a person can do.
He went to jail for that part and has to live with himself killing a guy. I think that's punishment enough.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GianfrancoWilletI think all of that may be true, but I know that at least in CA when you are found to be under the influence of any drugs or alcohol, even some marijuana that may have been in your system from weeks before, and you are involved in an accident in which there is injury you are immediately found at fault for the accident.
Originally posted by Tailback UIt won't say shit, because dying is for pussies.Comment
-
Originally posted by GianfrancoWilletI'm sure there's quite a few people that are sitting in jail on vehicular manslaughter charges that "could have done the same thing sober". The only difference is they didn't have the hush money to get off. Are you trying to say to me that Stallworth didn't know he had drank before he got behind the wheel?
Again, he offered to pay those people for what he did. And I think the family forgave him, or something like that. It's not like the guy "cheated" the system. The system is pretty much what allowed it.Comment
Comment