NFL Position Group Salary Analysis

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Chrispy
    Needs a hobby
    • Dec 2008
    • 11403

    NFL Position Group Salary Analysis

    It doesn’t take knowledge of the impending lockout to know the NFL these days is a high stakes game. The league’s 32 owners have to shell out billions of dollars to acquire and retain talent; that might seem like a small beer for wildly successful franchises like the Dallas Cowboys or Philadelphia Eagles, but would you want to be the Ford family, propping up a dismal Lions team in a half-full stadium? Probably not.


    Every owner enters the league expecting to spend money, but most owners hold out some hope that they’ll see some return on their investment. Earning the television rights fees commensurate with membership in the NFL is one thing, but when a general manager goes to his owner and asks for a huge lump sum to pay a free agent, well, it’s only natural that the owner would expect that player to improve the team.
  • Senser81
    VSN Poster of the Year
    • Feb 2009
    • 12804

    #2

    I don't really understand the point of the analysis. What is the reason for breaking everything down by 'position group', and then writing an "analysis" for only the highest-paying and lowest-paying team? The Chargers paid a lot of money for Phillip Rivers...the Bills paid a little money for Trent Edwards...AND??

    NFL teams pay more money for established players and veteran free agents...so the teams with those types of players in the 'position group' (like the Bronco DBs) will have a higher total salary than the teams with young draft choices (like the Bengal DBs). Thats about all I got out of this "analysis". Bill Barnwell has written several retarded articles, many of them on salary cap topics, and this is another one of them.

    Comment

    • the Brain
      Member
      • Jan 2010
      • 714

      #3
      Originally posted by Senser81
      I don't really understand the point of the analysis. What is the reason for breaking everything down by 'position group', and then writing an "analysis" for only the highest-paying and lowest-paying team? The Chargers paid a lot of money for Phillip Rivers...the Bills paid a little money for Trent Edwards...AND??

      NFL teams pay more money for established players and veteran free agents...so the teams with those types of players in the 'position group' (like the Bronco DBs) will have a higher total salary than the teams with young draft choices (like the Bengal DBs). Thats about all I got out of this "analysis". Bill Barnwell has written several retarded articles, many of them on salary cap topics, and this is another one of them.
      Agreed. It would have been informative if there was a report on who actually got the most/least for their buck throughout the league.

      Comment

      Working...