-
-
christ, you really are retarded... i have clarified this almost every post... did you go to college?? i have serious doubts about whether or not you received higher education from an accredited institution... and no, ECPI and phoenix online do not count...
says the guy who misspells words as frequently as steeljake... i mostly did it b/c ND doesnt deserve the extra effort it takes to type the "n"... seriously, you guys suck... lol, even your fucking avatar is from the past, fucking ND fans...Comment
-
Not your original one. Which would make it curious that you didn't clarify it knowing SOS would come up. If you knew it was going to kill your original generalized statement and thus didn't bring up SOS to begin with you would know enough to specify your original statement enough to take SOS out of the equation and direct the "body of work" directly at "Top teams".
You didn't.
You got called out.
You backpedaled and specified.
Aww ND sucks
And again. "doesnt" isn't a word.Comment
-
i never backpedaled... where the fuck do you get this shit from: i said body of work, you threw a hissy fit over SOS, i clarified that i was talking about top 25 teams, it took you 20 or so posts to grasp this concept.... your inability to comprehend coherent statements does not equal backpedaling... i want to live in your world where you can just make shit up out of thin air and use said made up shit as an excuse to why you are a retard and, most importantly, wrong... god damn, go to college...
doesnt dont cant thatll youll youd... they are all words on the interwebz, which you take way too srs.... btw, let me know next time you guys win a bowl game over a team not named Hawaii...Comment
-
only in retard iowa/illinois world... you asked for clarification, i gave it... how exactly does that equal backpedaling? oh thats right, it doesnt...
theyd arent wed hadnt shouldnt...
wow, its gonna another 7 sad years to be AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ND fan...Comment
-
you fail at football and at life... i completely anal raped you the entire argument, but you just kept harping on one thing, and it didnt even matter nor did it help your argument... stick to girls sports bro... i will give you credit for spelling everything correctly though, thats a start...Comment
-
No you didn't.
I also forgot your other great backpedal.
Calling 2008 and 2009 Alabama "mirror images" of eachother then admitting that 2009 Alabama was actually better at QB, RB, and WR.
Yeah, real "mirror images".
Also, speaking of spelling/grammar/etc.. It would be "anally" raped. Not anal. You would need to use the adverb form of the word to describe the verb (raped).Comment
-
space bar nigga...
you really have an incredibly hard time grasping basic offensive concepts... they were a mirror image of each other in the fact that they were run first offenses, and i always said the 2009 team was better than the 2008 team (although that should be obvious without words, since one won a national title and the other got hullated by Utah)... also, pertaining to my grammar, i ravaged your anus so hard with my argument that it removed the "ly" from the word... emphasis baby, learn it...Comment
-
I'm "lazy"...
Perfect, so every Alabama team will be "mirror images" of eachother until they become a pass first offense. I mean let's ignore different levels of talent at the positions on offense and what the offense and players are actually capable of.
ND's offense this year should be a "mirror image" of the past 5 years since it will be another pass first offense.
Saying one team is a "mirror image" of another is not the same as saying they are better than the other team.
Nice try.Comment
-
under Saban, yes... they still run the ball 60% of the time, just like they always have...
pretty much... there are some differences, but its still the same basic principles...
it was implied you dumbass... i figured any sane person with even a shred of football knowledge would be able to understand that... says a lot about you...Comment
-
Do you know what "mirror image" means?
If something is a "mirror image" you are trying to say it's exactly the same. There can be no "differences"................ because it's a mirror image.
No. What's implied by saying "mirror image" is saying things are exactly the same.
Which they weren't. You can't imply "differences" when saying "mirror image".
.. Odd.
You might want to turn that around. Any sane person wouldn't say Alabama's 2009 and 2008 teams were "mirror images" of eachother because there were differences..namely in the three most important offensive positions having, overall, much more talent.Comment
-
the basic principles of how they operate their offense are exactly the same... how are you not understanding this??
read above, dumbass...
coherency problems plague you: the basic principles are the same... never once did i say they were exactly the same team... it is your problem that you lack the ability to comprehend the 30 or so times i said they implemented the same basic strategy on offense... in that sense, they are mirror images of one another, but i guess i need to spell everything out for you next time, or you could stop arguing semantics... and really, the only position they had "much more" talent was at RB, everything else was virtually the same, they were just a year older...Comment
-
Basic principals being the same are not "mirror images" because not everything is the same.
Unless of course when you look in the mirror you're missing an ear that you actually have or perhaps have an extra eye that you don't have.
Basic principals being the same =/= to being a "mirror image".
Yes you did.
Mirror image. You said it. You used it.
Sucks to be you.
Yeah after you backpedaled when I called you out on your idiotic assertion the two teams were "mirror images"...yet one was much better than the other....which would immedietly make them not mirror images.
Except you admitted the QB was better. And the WR's talent developed and got better as well.
Nice try on backpedaling again.Comment
Tweet
Comment