Boise State hypocritical in not wanting to play Idaho

[FirstTimer]

i have said countless times that it was implied... you make me

Wrong again.

You say: Games against top teams are "all that matters"

Me: Not true. The games against non-top teams matter as well.

You: Well they don't matter as much.

Me: I know. I never said otherwise. I just said they mattered. Your original statement made them not matter "at all".


Mattering a little bit/less than games against top teams =/= to not mattering "at all".

Good work backpedaling again.

:pedobear:

[Atlas]

Wrong again.

You say: Games against top teams are "all that matters"

Me: Not true. The games against non-top teams matter as well.

You: Well they don't matter as much.

Me: I know. I never said otherwise. I just said they mattered. Your original statement made them not matter "at all".


Mattering a little bit/less than games against top teams =/= to not mattering "at all".

Good work backpedaling again.

:pedobear:

:orly:

i want to live in your world... you twist and maim what others say into your incredibly insane thoughts... if you actually read and comprehend what i type, instead of skimming, youd understand my argument... until then, keep on failing at every argument you try to make, it makes me look better... :smugusa:

[FirstTimer]

you twist and maim what others say

Yeah, silly me. Quoting you directly saying "games against top teams are all that matters."

i was talking about how they played against the top teams b/c thats all the matters

[Atlas]

Yeah, silly me. Quoting you directly saying "games against top teams are all that matters."

my mind is blown by how fucking stupid you are... keep harping on semantics retard... and yes, how they played against top teams is all that matters in the voters minds... :headbang:

stick to being a ND homer (i did it again) and let the real men talk about football, you are clearly in over your head...

[FirstTimer]

and yes, how they played against top teams is all that matters in the voters minds

You can't even stay consistant. You said, after backpedaling, that those games matter "more". Which implies a comparison to an amount. Which would mean games against non-top teams matter...but matter less than games against top teams.

[Atlas]

You can't even stay consistant. You said, after backpedaling, that those games matter "more". Which implies a comparison to an amount. Which would mean games against non-top teams matter...but matter less than games against top teams.

consistent*

your ability to compare arguments is just as bad as your comprehension skills and your football knowledge... i have always said games against top teams are what matters, the voters dont care if UF beat FIU by 70, b/c its supposed to happen... take up soccer, it would suit you a lot better...

[FirstTimer]

consistent*

i have always said games against top teams are what matters, the

*don't.
*it's

Also, it's not "what you've always said". You've gone from:

"all that matters"

to

"matter more"

back to

"all that matters"

in this thread alone.

[Atlas]

*don't.

Also, it's not all you've ever said. You've gone from:

"all that matter"

to

"matter more"

back to

"all that matters"

in this thread alone.

they all play off each other, especially when you cant comprehend simple concepts... i was trying to help you understand, but you keep arguing semantics...

[FirstTimer]

they all play off each other

Incorrect.

Either all games matter, with varying degrees, or only games against top teams matter.

Two different ideas/thoughts/theories.

Pick one.

[Atlas]

Incorrect.

Either all games matter, with varying degrees, or only games against top teams matter.

Two different ideas/thoughts/theories.

Pick one.

jesus fucking christ, guess i have to spell it out again... ALL THE VOTERS CARE ABOUT IS THE WINS OVER TOP TEAMS!!!! that clear enough for you retard??

[FirstTimer]

jesus fucking christ, guess i have to spell it out again... ALL THE VOTERS CARE ABOUT IS THE WINS OVER TOP TEAMS!!!! that clear enough for you retard??

Then why would you say that those wins matter "more" than wins over non-top teams if those wins over non top teams don't matter at "all"?

[Atlas]

Then why would you say that those wins matter "more" than wins over non-top teams if those wins over non top teams don't matter at "all"?

they matter more to the voters, ipso facto they are the biggest determining factor of where the voters place them, ipso facto they are all that matters...:gold:

c wut i did thurr?

[FirstTimer]

they matter more to the voters, ipso facto they are the biggest determining factor of where the voters place them, ipso facto they are all that matters...:gold:

No. Because "most" and "biggest" isn't "all".

If you went to the ATM and wanted to withdraw $500 and the machine gave you "most" of your money, say $475 dollars, would that be "all"?

[Atlas]

No. Because "most" and "biggest" isn't "all".

If you went to the ATM and wanted to withdraw $500 and the machine gave you "most" of your money, say $475 dollars, would that be "all"?

that is not even remotely close to being the same thing as im arguing... STRAWS HAVE BEEN GRASPED...:box:

[FirstTimer]

that is not even remotely close to being the same thing as im arguing... STRAWS HAVE BEEN GRASPED...:box:

Actually it is.

"most""biggest" =/= "all".