If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having trouble accessing your account and don't remember your password, email help@virtualsportsnetwork.com and i'll get you an updated password for 2024.
um, he's trading a back up running back in Stewart, for a starter in Mendenhall. That's basically the win right there. Receivers don't really matter to me as they are very easily replaceable.
I would give up Colston/Stewart for Mendenhall/Moss in a heartbeat.
I agree. Mendenhall gets all the carries and is a clear lead back, while if Stewart is lucky he'll get 10 carries. Colston is good, but Brees spreads the ball around so much you never know what he's going to do. McNabb likes Moss.
You might think Mendenhall and Stewart are both "2nd tier RBs" but my gut says that Mendenhall is going to have a much better year than Stewart.
I'd say Colston and Moss are going to have similar years, so the guy getting Mendenhall and Moss is winning this trade, IMO.
Yeah, this is true. But once more and more players get added to the mix, the values get muddled.
I traded for Stewart after the draft and I want to kill myself for it. Obviously Mendenhall will outproduce Stewart this year, but it kills me how many 3-for-3 trades and 4-for-4 trades I see get proposed on VSN. It's hardly ever based on team need, it's just "match up the positions."
Comment