Mike Leach suing ESPN for slander, libel

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NAHSTE
    Probably owns the site
    • Feb 2009
    • 22233

    Mike Leach suing ESPN for slander, libel

    Doubt he wins, it's pretty hard to win a slander or libel case in this day and age, but interesting nonetheless. I thought ESPN handled this shamefully, but I'm sure their strong legal team will prove that they were 'just reporting the facts'.




    LUBBOCK, Texas (AP)—Former coach Mike Leach sued ESPN Inc. and a public relations firm on Wednesday, accusing them of libel and slander after he was fired by Texas Tech amid accusations that he mistreated a player suffering from a concussion.

    The suit filed in Texas district court claims the network’s coverage of Leach’s firing last year was “willful and negligent defamation” and that it failed to “retract false and damaging statements” it made from “misinformation” provided to ESPN by Craig James, the father of the Texas Tech player.

    Josh Krulewitz, spokesman for the network based in Bristol, Conn., said officials had not seen the lawsuit and declined comment.

    Leach attorney Ted Liggett said the former coach wants “to set the record” straight.

    “Mike Leach is adamant,” Liggett said. “Mike Leach wants his name cleared. His reputation has taken a severe hit and been tarnished.”

    The university fired Leach last Dec. 30, two days after suspending him amid allegations he mistreated Adam James. Leach has denied the claim.

    Adam James has said his coach twice ordered him to stand for hours while confined in a dark place during practice. On Wednesday, Liggett claimed that Adam James under oath said he thought it was “humorous” what Leach told him to do and that he didn’t think Leach should have been fired.

    The suit, which seeks undisclosed damages and retractions from ESPN and the PR firm, was filed now because the statute of limitations on slander and libel is one year.

    “On a daily basis we’re still seeing stories across the country” with accounts Leach claims are counter to the truth, Liggett said. “Mike Leach is looking forward to getting back into coaching—he’s said that on several occasions.”

    Leach was fired a few days before Texas Tech beat Michigan State in the Alamo Bowl. Craig James was slated to be a broadcaster but was replaced by Dan Patrick, according to the suit.

    Patrick described Adam James to “an audience of millions,” saying, “There is Adam James, who is the young man who was actually punished for having a concussion,” the lawsuit claims. Patrick’s comments left the impression that “Leach punished a player for having a concussion.”

    Craig James is also a defendant in the lawsuit Leach filed against Texas Tech when he was fired. The university has appealed a ruling that Texas Tech waived its sovereign immunity protection by its conduct in Leach’s firing. A ruling is pending from the 7th Court of Appeals in Amarillo.

    In June, State District Judge William C. Sowder dismissed three top administrators—university system Chancellor Kent Hance, school President Guy Bailey, athletic director Gerald Myers—from that suit. The two sides earlier this week agreed that the three would not face future lawsuits over Leach’s firing.

    The libel suit also names Spaeth Communications as a defendant, claiming James hired the firm for “purposes of creating public opinion hostile to Leach.”

    Liggett said Spaeth was behind the Internet posting of a video Adam James shot while he stood in one of the dark places.

    “Because his effort to sue Texas Tech University individuals failed, it now appears that coach Leach is looking for someone else to blame, and has shifted his focus to the Craig James family, ESPN and Spaeth Communications,” firm executive vice president Rebecca Shaw said in an e-mail. “This lawsuit is the predictable strategy of a man who is desperate to avoid accountability for his own behavior.”
  • SuperKevin
    War Hero
    • Dec 2009
    • 8759

    #2
    Who cares. Fuck that guy. I heard he blows dudes in bus stations.

    I hope he sues me now.

    Comment

    • NAHSTE
      Probably owns the site
      • Feb 2009
      • 22233

      #3
      Mike Leach is a great coach and one of the few who differs from the same mold. We need more like him, or just more unlike everyone else. I would love to see him get back in coaching.

      Comment

      • ram29jackson
        Noob
        • Nov 2008
        • 0

        #4
        Originally posted by NAHSTE
        Mike Leach is a great coach and one of the few who differs from the same mold. We need more like him, or just more unlike everyone else. I would love to see him get back in coaching.


        el oh el he is just another ball coach. and an even lousier man

        Comment

        • Hasselbeck
          Jus' bout dat action boss
          • Feb 2009
          • 6175

          #5
          Originally posted by NAHSTE
          Mike Leach is a great coach and one of the few who differs from the same mold. We need more like him, or just more unlike everyone else. I would love to see him get back in coaching.
          He's going to be the next coach at New Mexico. Book it.
          Originally posted by ram29jackson
          I already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SB

          Comment

          • NAHSTE
            Probably owns the site
            • Feb 2009
            • 22233

            #6
            Originally posted by ram29jackson
            el oh el he is just another ball coach. and an even lousier man
            Leach has a law degree, a pirate fetish, and has never actually played football.

            This makes him nothing like most coaches.

            Comment

            • citizenerased
              Rugby World Cup Champion
              • Mar 2009
              • 1580

              #7
              His actual football team's are nothing unique though.

              Line up in shotgun and unleash the dragon 75 times a game for 545 yards in the air, win 55-41.

              Hardly anything ground breaking in the world of college football.
              Don't Sit Down 'Cause I've Moved Your Chair

              Comment

              • packersfan4eva
                Ryan Luxem
                • Dec 2008
                • 9052

                #8
                Originally posted by citizenerased
                His actual football team's are nothing unique though.

                Line up in shotgun and unleash the dragon 75 times a game for 545 yards in the air, win 55-41.

                Hardly anything ground breaking in the world of college football.
                Key word in that rant.

                He wins.

                Originally posted by Miggyfan99
                I would get fucked in the ass for WS tickets too... only if Miguel was playing though

                Comment

                • MrBill
                  Billy Brewer Sucks Penis
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 0

                  #9
                  Originally posted by NAHSTE
                  Doubt he wins, it's pretty hard to win a slander or libel case in this day and age, but interesting nonetheless. I thought ESPN handled this shamefully, but I'm sure their strong legal team will prove that they were 'just reporting the facts'.

                  http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/footbal...exastech-leach
                  Agreed. Doubt Leach is able to fight them to a victory in court since ESPN has such deep corporate pockets but it was handled poorly by ESPN even by their low standards for journalistic integrity.

                  Comment

                  • FedEx227
                    Delivers
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 10454

                    #10
                    Still though he has two huge things working against him in a libel case.

                    He's a public figure and you have to show intent or show that ESPN's primary goal was to destroy his image over reporting the facts.

                    You can argue that ESPN handled it poorly, but that's jut bad journalism, not a clear-cut agenda to destroy Leach's public image.
                    VoicesofWrestling.com

                    Comment

                    • Warner2BruceTD
                      2011 Poster Of The Year
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 26142

                      #11
                      I love Leach, he's right up there with June Jones & Mike Martz in my book. Plus he's a tremendous soundbite waiting to happen.

                      Comment

                      • NAHSTE
                        Probably owns the site
                        • Feb 2009
                        • 22233

                        #12
                        Originally posted by FedEx227
                        Still though he has two huge things working against him in a libel case.

                        He's a public figure and you have to show intent or show that ESPN's primary goal was to destroy his image over reporting the facts.

                        You can argue that ESPN handled it poorly, but that's jut bad journalism, not a clear-cut agenda to destroy Leach's public image.
                        Exactly.

                        Comment

                        • FedEx227
                          Delivers
                          • Mar 2009
                          • 10454

                          #13
                          Seems like a "give me a really small settlement so we don't have to waste each other's time" type deal.
                          VoicesofWrestling.com

                          Comment

                          • JeremyHight
                            I wish I was Scrubs
                            • Feb 2009
                            • 4063

                            #14
                            Originally posted by FedEx227
                            Still though he has two huge things working against him in a libel case.

                            He's a public figure and you have to show intent or show that ESPN's primary goal was to destroy his image over reporting the facts.

                            You can argue that ESPN handled it poorly, but that's jut bad journalism, not a clear-cut agenda to destroy Leach's public image.
                            Plus, ESPN had a source involved with the situation. The source was biased, but it completely destroys the idea that ESPN purposely made up lies to hurt the image of Leech.

                            Comment

                            Working...