TCU should get a real national championship game vs. Auburn/Oregon

[dave]

Why not sked the winner of that game vs. TCU a week later in a neutral site?
Seems so logical.

[Primetime]

It would make too much money for everyone involved.

[1ke]

Fuck money....it makes too much sense for Bill Hankock!

[Rudi]

[Obst]

Sounds like a playoff system. The BCS laughs at this scenario.

[JayDizzle]

If you aren't ranked #1 or #2, a bag of dicks for you sir.

[NAHSTE]

Why not sked the winner of that game vs. TCU a week later in a neutral site?
Seems so logical.

Since 2003, people have been clamoring for this. Instead, the NCAA continues to be gay. Some millionaire offered to pay for LSU and USC to play, but obviously it never went down. It's a shame. College football would be THE BEST sport in America, unquestionably, if they would just get their heads out of their ass and fix their postseason. But they probably won't, ever, due to the insane amount of money being made to keep it broken.

[Fox1994]

Since 2003, people have been clamoring for this. Instead, the NCAA continues to be gay. Some millionaire offered to pay for LSU and USC to play, but obviously it never went down. It's a shame. College football would be THE BEST sport in America, unquestionably, if they would just get their heads out of their ass and fix their postseason. But they probably won't, ever, due to the insane amount of money being made to keep it broken.

Which is also illogical because of the amount of money they could make through a playoff, but it is what it is.

[Hasselbeck]

TCU-Wisconsin was the first bowl game I watched this bowl season.

The rest of these bowls are meaningless. How anyone (JeremyHight) can defend this system is beyond me.

[JeremyHight]

TCU-Wisconsin was the first bowl game I watched this bowl season.

The rest of these bowls are meaningless. How anyone (JeremyHight) can defend this system is beyond me.

I've only ever said that my first choice would be a 4 team playoff, which is exactly what Dave was making a point of saying.

My setup this year would have been

1. Auburn
4. Wisconsin

2. Oregon
3. TCU

With the winners playing eachother the week after.

[Bear Pand]

I've only ever said that my first choice would be a 4 team playoff, which is exactly what Dave was making a point of saying.

My setup this year would have been

1. Auburn
4. Wisconsin

2. Oregon
3. TCU

With the winners playing eachother the week after.

Would work out perfectly too especially if the Big 10 had a better conference game format to narrow it down to one team between Wisky/OSU/MSU instead of 3 champs.

[NAHSTE]

I've only ever said that my first choice would be a 4 team playoff, which is exactly what Dave was making a point of saying.

My setup this year would have been

1. Auburn
4. Wisconsin

2. Oregon
3. TCU

With the winners playing eachother the week after.

Wisconsin was #5. And please don't give me the "Stanford didn't win their conference" excuse, because neither did Wisconsin, really.

[Hasselbeck]

Might as well just end this thread before it begins.

JeremyHight: Pro BCS bullshit.. or give me a +1 system

Everyone Else With Common Sense: 8 team playoff

That was easy.

[St. Francisco]

Might as well just end this thread before it begins.

JeremyHight: Pro BCS bullshit.. or give me a +1 system

Everyone Else With Common Sense: 8 team playoff

That was easy.

/thread

Seriously.

[Fox1994]

Might as well just end this thread before it begins.

JeremyHight: Pro BCS bullshit.. or give me a +1 system

Everyone Else With Common Sense: 8 team playoff

That was easy.

Fox: will take any playoff: 12 teams, 16 teams, 24 teams, 32 teams...

Shit, we have 35 bowls including 70 teams. 6-6 and 7-5 teams? Ridiculous.