Best Units of 2010-2011

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kmanharris
    Seven
    • Oct 2008
    • 6427

    #16
    Originally posted by Deviant
    HB & FB: Oakland Raiders - Darren McFadden, Michael Bush, Marcel Reese (Honorable Mention: Baltimore Ravens - Ray Rice, Willis McGahee, Le'Ron McClain)

    WR & TE: New York Giants - Hakeem Nicks, Steve Smith, Mario Manningham, Kevin Boss (Honorable Mention: Green Bay Packers - Greg Jennings, Donald Driver, James Jones, Jordy Nelson)

    I'll fill out the rest later.



    No. No. No.
    Biased much? How long were Smith and Nicks out for? What did Smith/Boss do this year? How many dropped passes did they have as a unit that led directly to interceptions? GB & NE both had better units by far.

    Comment

    • Juggernaut
      Sitting on the Sidelines
      • Dec 2008
      • 5670

      #17
      O-Line: Jets

      And I would make an argument for the Jets receiving core. Jerricho Cotchery, Santonio Holmes, Braylon Edwards, Brad Smith, Dustin Keller. All great weapons to throw to.

      Comment

      • Primetime
        Thank You Prince
        • Nov 2008
        • 17526

        #18
        Originally posted by Jewgernaut
        O-Line: Jets

        And I would make an argument for the Jets receiving core. Jerricho Cotchery, Santonio Holmes, Braylon Edwards, Brad Smith, Dustin Keller. All great weapons to throw to.
        I think we can find a better unit this year than a core that led the team to the 22nd best passing attack in the league. They're a good group of receivers, but they weren't nearly the best this year.

        Comment

        • BigBucs
          Unpretentious
          • May 2009
          • 12758

          #19
          Originally posted by Jewgernaut
          O-Line: Jets

          And I would make an argument for the Jets receiving core. Jerricho Cotchery, Santonio Holmes, Braylon Edwards, Brad Smith, Dustin Keller. All great weapons to throw to.
          Then why did Sanchez look like such a bum? :ionno:

          Originally posted by Primetime232
          I think we can find a better unit this year than a core that led the team to the 22nd best passing attack in the league. They're a good group of receivers, but they weren't nearly the best this year.
          Dont blame them, blame the passer.




          Comment

          • Primetime
            Thank You Prince
            • Nov 2008
            • 17526

            #20
            Originally posted by FreemanTheGod
            Then why did Sanchez look like such a bum? :ionno:


            Dont blame them, blame the passer.
            This isn't about who is solely the most talented though. You can't put those guys as the best unit when they accounted for the 22nd ranked passing game.

            Comment

            • BigBucs
              Unpretentious
              • May 2009
              • 12758

              #21
              Originally posted by Primetime232
              This isn't about who is solely the most talented though. You can't put those guys as the best unit when they accounted for the 22nd ranked passing game.
              I understand that completely but all I was implying was that 22 ranked passing ranking can be heavily attributed to the overrated Mark Sanchez. A much more capable QB would have greater success considering the weapons they have at TE, WR and RB not to mention their OL.




              Comment

              • Primetime
                Thank You Prince
                • Nov 2008
                • 17526

                #22
                Originally posted by FreemanTheGod
                I understand that completely but all I was implying was that 22 ranked passing ranking can be heavily attributed to the overrated Mark Sanchez. A much more capable QB would have greater success considering the weapons they have at TE, WR and RB not to mention their OL.
                Completely agree. I hate Sanchez, Rex Ryan, Revis, and most of the rest of the Jets. Those three especially are overrated.

                Comment

                • Woy
                  RIP West
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 16372

                  #23
                  BB still bitching about Marc Sanchez.

                  *waits for him to go onto a long rant claiming Josh Freeman as the second coming of Christ and have everyone else argue with him about it, derailing the original topic at hand*



                  ^ Shouts to MvP for the sick sig. GFX TEAM BACK

                  .

                  Comment

                  • 1ke
                    D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 6641

                    #24
                    Im going homer, but I think they're legit picks.

                    Bears for Special Tems
                    Bears for LB's. B-Lak was great, Lance was very very good. And Pisa was a unsung hero and shored things up ALOT...

                    Comment

                    • Primetime
                      Thank You Prince
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 17526

                      #25
                      Originally posted by 1ke
                      Im going homer, but I think they're legit picks.

                      Bears for Special Tems
                      Bears for LB's. B-Lak was great, Lance was very very good. And Pisa was a unsung hero and shored things up ALOT...
                      I agree with the Bears for special teams when it comes to returners. As for linebackers, I don't see how anyone can pick any team but the Steelers for this one. Harrison/Woodley/Farrior/Timmons > All

                      Comment

                      • 1ke
                        D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 6641

                        #26
                        Originally posted by Primetime232
                        I agree with the Bears for special teams when it comes to returners. As for linebackers, I don't see how anyone can pick any team but the Steelers for this one. Harrison/Woodley/Farrior/Timmons > All
                        I totally meant 4-3 only :redsmug:

                        Comment

                        • Deviant
                          Yes, please.
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 2861

                          #27
                          Originally posted by kmanharris
                          Biased much? How long were Smith and Nicks out for? What did Smith/Boss do this year? How many dropped passes did they have as a unit that led directly to interceptions? GB & NE both had better units by far.
                          Despite the fact that only one of these receivers didn't miss a game this season:



                          Sorry, I can't hear you over your biased Cowboys hatred. Yeah, I don't want the core of guys that get me 28 TDs in a season because Green Bay and New England are just THAT much better.


                          Back at it, yet again. Sign up here!

                          Comment

                          • strahanfan92
                            Meat
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 5456

                            #28
                            Originally posted by Deviant
                            HB & FB: Oakland Raiders - Darren McFadden, Michael Bush, Marcel Reese (Honorable Mention: Baltimore Ravens - Ray Rice, Willis McGahee, Le'Ron McClain)

                            WR & TE: New York Giants - Hakeem Nicks, Steve Smith, Mario Manningham, Kevin Boss (Honorable Mention: Green Bay Packers - Greg Jennings, Donald Driver, James Jones, Jordy Nelson)

                            I'll fill out the rest later.



                            No. No. No.

                            Did you just really say no to the Patriots and then listed the Giants?

                            Did you watch the games? It's not all about stats. Do you remember all the drops and drops turned interceptions? Boss wasn't even a top 15 wideout this year, must of averaged a drop per game.

                            Comment

                            • Deviant
                              Yes, please.
                              • Nov 2008
                              • 2861

                              #29
                              Originally posted by strahanfan92
                              Did you just really say no to the Patriots and then listed the Giants?

                              Did you watch the games? It's not all about stats. Do you remember all the drops and drops turned interceptions? Boss wasn't even a top 15 wideout this year, must of averaged a drop per game.
                              If it were all about the stats, I wouldn't include the Ravens as an honorable mention because it wouldn't make sense.

                              Drops happen. Every QB deals with it. All 25 INTs aren't all the wide receivers faults. And for the mistakes they make, they usually always make the huge plays. With Steve Smith healthy (which he wasn't this season), that receiving core is unbelievably productive.

                              Also:



                              Not a Giant on that list. So... I don't get it?


                              Back at it, yet again. Sign up here!

                              Comment

                              • Primetime
                                Thank You Prince
                                • Nov 2008
                                • 17526

                                #30
                                The only thing holding the Giants back is the mediocrity of Eli. I do love Manningham in the receiver core and it could be a battle between the Giants and Packers for this next year again.

                                Comment

                                Working...