Super Bowl XLV from Chicago's Perspective

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Colonel Angus
    No longer a noob
    • Jan 2010
    • 1935

    Super Bowl XLV from Chicago's Perspective

    This aticle is for Rush, 1ke, and every other Bears fan on here...

    courtesy of the Chicago Tribune

    Other than Pittsburgh, no other football city endured a longer Monday than Chicago.

    Some Bears fans probably would rather go through last week's blizzard again than get buried by all the love heaped upon the Packers and Aaron Rodgers after their Super Bowl XLV win over the Steelers. Knowing two of the Packers' six straight victories on the way to the title came against their NFC North rivals is enough for some Grabowski households to rid their refrigerators of cheddar.

    Take solace, Chicagoans, in the only thing you can. It could be worse.

    They could have built a roof over Lambeau Field.


    Imagine Rodgers playing every home game under ideal conditions. On second thought, don't. I can't be responsible for any Bears fan's insomnia.

    As Rodgers showed against the Falcons in the Georgia Dome in the playoffs with a nearly flawless showing, he does more damage on indoor carpet than a new puppy. He was at it again on the artificial surface of Cowboys Stadium, picking his spots, beating the blitz, heating up at room temperature against the NFL's No. 1 defense.

    But Rodgers did more than simply escape tired comparisons to Brett Favre and deepen his bond with kindred quarterback spirit Steve Young — who helped Favre's successor navigate life following a legend. Rodgers established himself as an elite quarterback who deserves mention after the names Tom Brady and Peyton Manning. There's Brady, Manning, Rodgers, Drew Brees and … Philip Rivers?

    Some cities get all the quarterbacks.

    Consider Rodgers completed 24 of 39 passes for 304 yards and three TDs without an interception in the Super Bowl — and had at least four passes dropped.

    The scariest part?

    "The challenge now goes to repeating, scrutinizing this season, finding ways to get better," Rodgers said Monday at a news conference. "As a kid, I always wanted to obviously win a Super Bowl. Now that I've got one, it's like, 'Now what?' Let's go get another one."

    I don't know of an NFC North team good enough yet to get in the Packers' way once they add their 15 injured players into the mix. I can think of only one or two teams possibly capable in the entire NFC. The Patriots in the AFC with a bunch of draft picks come the closest, so, assuming there's football in 2011, let's look forward to Indianapolis hosting a Super Bowl XLVI showdown between Rodgers and Brady.

    Until then, many teams now chasing the Packers can learn from Rodgers — starting with the Bears.

    If I am in the Bears' front office, I hire somebody to make a videotape documenting the way Rodgers conducted himself during Super Bowl week. Examine how Rodgers handled interviews, dealt with people, suffered fools. Then find out where Jay Cutler is and FedEx him a copy to study a professional franchise quarterback acting like one. Every day, Rodgers made the Packers organization a little prouder.

    Have an image consultant go over every last detail of Rodgers' Super Bowl week with Cutler. Make Rodgers the standard by which Cutler should measure himself in every way — because that is his new reality.

    That's not picking on Cutler. But something's missing, and only he can find it during the most critical offseason of his career. As one NFC coach reminded me last week, talentwise, there is nothing Rodgers can do that Cutler can't. He can be that good. Sure, Rodgers benefits from a deeper receiving corps and a better offensive line. But Rodgers ascended quickly to this level because of intangibles such as maturity, poise and patience.

    If you don't think those off-the-field traits are related to on-the-field predictors for an NFL quarterback, you're not paying attention to what makes the top 10 at the position worthy of that status.

    An obvious quality Rodgers has that Cutler lacks is something people rarely mention: humility. It humbled Rodgers to drop to 24th overall in the 2005 NFL draft. Holding a clipboard his first three seasons didn't exactly give him reason to be cocky. He likely cursed his plight back then, but waiting made Rodgers better in terms of attitude and ability when his time finally came after the Favre trade in 2008.

    Rodgers' gradual progress gives every NFL team something to consider as the possibility of a rookie salary cap looms in the next collective bargaining agreement. How many more first-round quarterbacks might benefit from a backup role as Rodgers did before being thrust into the forefront? For every Mark Sanchez there is a Brady Quinn.

    The current system that guarantees small fortunes to quarterbacks selected high such as Sam Bradford or Matthew Stafford prematurely forces them onto the field where they often develop bad habits that threaten their confidence. Outrageous financial commitments make the development clock tick louder.

    Guys like Bradford and Stafford show glimpses of greatness, but how much more polish and consistency might they show if they spent their first two years learning from a veteran?

    As the Steelers found out the hard way, the education of Rodgers is now complete.

    "I thought Aaron Rodgers played like Aaron Rodgers," Packers coach Mike McCarthy said.

    But a star wasn't born in the Super Bowl. Rodgers was carefully molded and shaped until it was clear he was ready to shine.
  • zack54attack
    Posts a lot
    • Dec 2008
    • 4296

    #2
    We cant draft. Year after year the Bears FO fucks up the drafts. With 15 players over the Age of 30, the future doesn't look bright for us.


    Comment

    • Primetime
      Thank You Prince
      • Nov 2008
      • 17526

      #3
      For you Bears fans, who were you rooting for in the SB? Did you want the Steelers to shut down the Packers for rivalry reasons or were you rooting for the NFC North to get a crown? In a college setting, I'm always rooting for a Big 10 team in the championship, no matter who it is, but I definitely would have been rooting for the Steelers had the Bears been there instead of the Packers.

      Comment

      • Tengo Juego
        Posts a lot
        • Jun 2009
        • 4289

        #4
        Originally posted by Primetime232
        For you Bears fans, who were you rooting for in the SB? Did you want the Steelers to shut down the Packers for rivalry reasons or were you rooting for the NFC North to get a crown? In a college setting, I'm always rooting for a Big 10 team in the championship, no matter who it is, but I definitely would have been rooting for the Steelers had the Bears been there instead of the Packers.
        I wouldn't have even watched. When we lost in 07 to NYG, I didn't even pay attention to the game.

        Comment

        • strahanfan92
          Meat
          • Aug 2009
          • 5456

          #5
          Originally posted by Primetime232
          For you Bears fans, who were you rooting for in the SB? Did you want the Steelers to shut down the Packers for rivalry reasons or were you rooting for the NFC North to get a crown? In a college setting, I'm always rooting for a Big 10 team in the championship, no matter who it is, but I definitely would have been rooting for the Steelers had the Bears been there instead of the Packers.
          If you were a Bears fan and were rooting for the Packers please turn your fan card back in.

          Comment

          • ram29jackson
            Noob
            • Nov 2008
            • 0

            #6
            the Bears and Packers both represent a long football history. I root for the Packers against the Bears. But either team winning during the season and playoffs helps keep old school football history alive.

            I cant believe reading some of you guys who say I didnt watch the Super bowl because my team missed getting in or something ?

            Comment

            • 1ke
              D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F
              • Mar 2009
              • 6641

              #7
              David Haugh is ok....but I think this article sucks imo. He is all over the place. First stroking Arron, then bashing Jay, then talking bout other random QBs....

              First, he says it could be worse....Uhh not really. Jay overthrows Devin on a post route and the Packers seal the victory to get in. Then another interception on the final drive of the game to tie it up to lose the conference championship. Thats 2 losses on the 2 final possessions to your arch rivals in very important games. That is as bad as it can get.

              Second, why does he say Jay can learn alot from Arron. Uhhh thats obvious, so can 25 other QBs as well, but I still dont get why Jay's ATTITUDE is such a focus. I dont get it. How was Jay not the ultimate professional this season? Sacked the most...yup, bitch, nope. Worst WR corps in the league?....yup, bitch publicly, nope. Hell, one of his starting WR is a HOF return man. His second best WR plays TE.
              Sure, Rodgers benefits from a deeper receiving corps and a better offensive line.
              Is that not kind of a VERY BIG deal? Not to mention Arron has been coached up very well, while Jay is having these bums try to coach him up.

              Third...I didnt watch the game. I wathed 16 Blocks on TV, then District 9. Caught some highlights on SC later the next day. As soon as the Packers Bears game ended my season was over and had ZERO interest whatsoever in that game. Call me a sore loser, fine. But living in Milwaukee, i havent watched any sort of local news either in 2 weeks, and look away everytime I see a news paper...

              Comment

              • Colonel Angus
                No longer a noob
                • Jan 2010
                • 1935

                #8
                Originally posted by 1ke
                Call me a sore loser, fine. But living in Milwaukee, i havent watched any sort of local news either in 2 weeks, and look away everytime I see a news paper...
                Yeah that's gotta suck..

                Comment

                • Senser81
                  VSN Poster of the Year
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 12804

                  #9
                  Originally posted by 1ke
                  Second, why does he say Jay can learn alot from Arron. Uhhh thats obvious, so can 25 other QBs as well, but I still dont get why Jay's ATTITUDE is such a focus. I dont get it.
                  I don't get it either. The focus should be on how mediocre Cutler has been since he's been on the Bears, and how he hasn't really improved at all with his decision-making.

                  Comment

                  • Tengo Juego
                    Posts a lot
                    • Jun 2009
                    • 4289

                    #10
                    What's the story behind calling him "Arron" 1ke?

                    Comment

                    • packersfan4eva
                      Ryan Luxem
                      • Dec 2008
                      • 9052

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Primetime232
                      For you Bears fans, who were you rooting for in the SB? Did you want the Steelers to shut down the Packers for rivalry reasons or were you rooting for the NFC North to get a crown? In a college setting, I'm always rooting for a Big 10 team in the championship, no matter who it is, but I definitely would have been rooting for the Steelers had the Bears been there instead of the Packers.
                      If a Big 10 team goes to the championship game, I root for them (unless it's Purdue or Illinois).

                      If the Bears or Vikings go the Big game, they can get blown out by 50 for all I care.

                      Originally posted by Miggyfan99
                      I would get fucked in the ass for WS tickets too... only if Miguel was playing though

                      Comment

                      • 1ke
                        D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 6641

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Tengo Juego
                        What's the story behind calling him "Arron" 1ke?
                        Just a typo...**Im a dumb ass**

                        Comment

                        • Tengo Juego
                          Posts a lot
                          • Jun 2009
                          • 4289

                          #13
                          Awe. While I waited for your reply I thought about it. I thought it was a fancy was of saying "Are on" or "Air on".

                          Comment

                          Working...