Reviewing the trash heap that has been the Bears Free Agency Period
Collapse
X
-
-
Ok.
:obama:
Jesus Christ you are dense.
The point wasn't that Forte would fair better. The point was the spending money on a slow power back and putting him behind a shitty offensive line serves no real purpose in relation to who the Bears could have had at RB when they already have a guy like Unga that can move the pile(which is what they brought him in to do).
Bush and Sproles carried a lot more value to the Bears just by the mere fact of the scheme the Bears run.
Is Barber a better power back than Forte? Sure.
Is Forte more than capable of getting yardage in short situations if he has a bit better blocking? Yes.
Hence, the Barber signing is useless if the Bears would have spent the money more wisely at OL(WHICH WOULD HAVE HELPED OUT ALL FACETS OF THE OFFENSE)
and they could have had MORE TALENTED RB's THAN MARION BARBER ADDED TO THE ROSTER.
You go from doubt to "no chance"?
Make up your mind.
Let me put it to you this way. Compared to Barber in short yardage... Unga, not that good. Taylor, not as good. Forte, not proven to say the least. Barber better and proven. The Bears have their feature back, great. To round out that backfield they needed a more qualified short yardage back. Unga and Taylor combined, maybe would have been ok. But bring in one of the leagues best short yardage backs and you instantly have a thunder and lightning combo that might just surprise you next year. Maybe not. Maybe all Barber does is pick up a few touchdowns Forte might not have. Maybe he gets a few first downs Forte might not have. But in this case, that's just helping win games, I have no idea why you would ever want that...:noidea:
If Barber doesn't pan out, oh fucking well. They only got him on a 2 year deal, for cheap no less. I think Chester Taylor is making more money next year in fact. If Barber pans out and you trade away/cut Taylor, good for them. If Barber doesn't fit in, you got Taylor for another 3 years I think.
Quit crying about Barber, you have a shit ton of other horrible of season shit to worry about than this guy.sigpicComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Let me just say I think Roy Williams is going to pleasantly surprise a lot of people, especially with expectations so low.Comment
-
Come on man, there is more to short yardage to just "moving the pile". Marcus Allen is one of the best goaline/short yardage backs ever, and he wasn't a "move the pile" kind of runner. It takes more skill than simply being a pile mover in many cases. And are you honestly trying to sell me that Unga is a better short yardage back than Barber? STFU already. and you call me dense. Unga bro?...Unga? Your answer is Unga? LOL
Forte is a more skilled back than Barber. Could he be a better short yardage back with a better OL? Sure.
Barber proved he was a good short yardage back behind a good/above average OL. The Bears don't have that. Plus Barber is coming in off an injury etc.
Maybe. I'm convinced you haven't seen a Bears game in years. Barber running behind that offensive line isn't going anywhere because he has nothing but straight line. Forte at least offers the chance at some agility.
Barber only has 100 fewer carries in his career than Taylor.
:yawn:
WINNING!
Comment
-
Barber proved he was a good short yardage back behind a good/above average OL. The Bears don't have that. Plus Barber is coming in off an injury etc.
Maybe. I'm convinced you haven't seen a Bears game in years. Barber running behind that offensive line isn't going anywhere because he has nothing but straight line. Forte at least offers the chance at some agility.
Barber only has 100 fewer carries in his career than Taylor.
Based on what?
Odd. The Bears made the NFC Championship game. The Saints lost to a 7-9 team in the playoffs.sigpicComment
-
New Orleans is a hell hole.
It's not just that these players chose not to come to Chicago..it's that Chicago never made plays for them to begin with.
Get a fucking clue.Comment
-
It's not just that these players chose not to come to Chicago..it's that Chicago never made plays for them to begin with.
Get a fucking clue.
THE FUCKING PRICE TAG....jeezus!
Bush is owed $11 mil in 2011. Even if he restructures he'll most likely still demand over $9 mil.
Sproles' asking price in 2010 was $7.3 mil. The saints were lucky to get him for $14 mil over 4 years.
I don't think the Bears would be smart to sign any RB for that price. They got a steal in Barber for a short contract, only 2 years at $5 mil. That's $2.5 per. They got him cheap for good reason, injured last year, lost his starting job...etc. etc. But when healthy he's a beast.
On top of the money, it was reported...as I said before...it was reported that Bush signed with Miami because they offered him the feature back role. So even if Chicago had the money or was willing to spend it, Bush still wouldn't have come to town. I think Sproles had the same mindset, considering his choice. Sproles would have fit in oddly with Forte and lost a lot of passing downs to Forte, so again even if they would have been willing to spend for him, he wouldn't have came.
To argue any point with Bush/Sproles in any point of reference is again, a non sequitur at best. In other words, it's a non argueent...a non point. It's moot. It's not worth your time to consider. Just stop it.
Of the RB's available, I think the Bears brought in the best they could for the price. Barber is admittedly a slight gamble, I'll admit at least as much. But he's proven in the past to have some skills that Forte lacks. I think this will be a good combination. We'll see. If he does what's expected, GREAT! I just don't think he'll be any worse than Chester Taylor, and he's about $1 mil cheaper if I'm not mistaken. Looks win/win to me.sigpicComment
-
You're dumb for running a Reviewing the trash heap that has been the Bears Free Agency Period thread while trying to convince that anybody would want to go to a team that's obviously going in the wrong direction.
:niggaplease:
THE FUCKING PRICE TAG....jeezus!
Bush is owed $11 mil in 2011. Even if he restructures he'll most likely still demand over $9 mil.
Sproles' asking price in 2010 was $7.3 mil. The saints were lucky to get him for $14 mil over 4 years.
I don't think the Bears would be smart to sign any RB for that price. They got a steal in Barber for a short contract, only 2 years at $5 mil. That's $2.5 per. They got him cheap for good reason, injured last year, lost his starting job...etc. etc. But when healthy he's a beast.
On top of the money, it was reported...as I said before...it was reported that Bush signed with Miami because they offered him the feature back role. So even if Chicago had the money or was willing to spend it, Bush still wouldn't have come to town. I think Sproles had the same mindset, considering his choice. Sproles would have fit in oddly with Forte and lost a lot of passing downs to Forte, so again even if they would have been willing to spend for him, he wouldn't have came.
To argue any point with Bush/Sproles in any point of reference is again, a non sequitur at best. In other words, it's a non argueent...a non point. It's moot. It's not worth your time to consider. Just stop it.
Of the RB's available, I think the Bears brought in the best they could for the price. Barber is admittedly a slight gamble, I'll admit at least as much. But he's proven in the past to have some skills that Forte lacks. I think this will be a good combination. We'll see. If he does what's expected, GREAT! I just don't think he'll be any worse than Chester Taylor, and he's about $1 mil cheaper if I'm not mistaken. Looks win/win to me.Comment
-
Barber isn't a gamble at all, because, as you said, he is only making $2.5 mil/yr. And, more importantly, his role on the team will be miniscule. Barber probably won't work out because the Bears O-line is terrible. I don't understand why a team desperate for weapons would pass on Sproles and instead get Barber. They basically pissed away $2.5mil, because Barber isn't any better than Forte. Sproles can do so many different things than Forte. I don't think the Bears saved anything by signing Barber, because Sproles would have given the Bears more production at a cheaper rate. Barber had about 400 all-purpose yards last year, Sproles had 2200+.
But Sproles asking price was too high for the Bears obviously. I don't think the Bears wanted to spend much on a RB when they have Forte in pocket. It looks like the Bears strategy is to pick up a lot of average players for less money, than to pick up just two or three above average and overpay.
The gamble I'm talking about is low risk high reward. Low risk because if he's no better than Chester, no big deal...it didn't work out, and you didn't pay out the arse for him. High reward in that if he turns out to be at least as good as he was pre-2010, amazing, you've got lightning in a bottle and thunder in short yardage...great. Not that risky, but still a $2.5 mil gamble.
The only point I want to make for Barber is, and I think you understand it Senser, is Barber is a low cost RB who can possibly find a niche on this offense. He's obviously not the answer to the Bears need for a playmaker, but he's also not going to hinder the Bears quest to find that guy at all. I mean he's cheap. And one day, hopefully when the team finds that playmaker, and God willing they fix that oline, Barber will at that point, more than likely, seem like a genius signing.sigpicComment
-
For fuck sakes, what part of Barber had lingering calf/knee injuries last season do you not understand? By the time Barber came back to the lineup he was still hampered by injuries, and Jones/Choice proved worthy enough to take his carries away. (don't mix my words though, Sproles is better)
But Sproles asking price was too high for the Bears obviously. I don't think the Bears wanted to spend much on a RB when they have Forte in pocket. It looks like the Bears strategy is to pick up a lot of average players for less money, than to pick up just two or three above average and overpay.
The gamble I'm talking about is low risk high reward. Low risk because if he's no better than Chester, no big deal...it didn't work out, and you didn't pay out the arse for him. High reward in that if he turns out to be at least as good as he was pre-2010, amazing, you've got lightning in a bottle and thunder in short yardage...great. Not that risky, but still a $2.5 mil gamble.
The only point I want to make for Barber is, and I think you understand it Senser, is Barber is a low cost RB who can possibly find a niche on this offense. He's obviously not the answer to the Bears need for a playmaker, but he's also not going to hinder the Bears quest to find that guy at all. I mean he's cheap. And one day, hopefully when the team finds that playmaker, and God willing they fix that oline, Barber will at that point, more than likely, seem like a genius signing.
Would you rather pay $2.5 million for 400 yards, or $3.25 million for 2200 yards?Comment
-
Or are you confusing him with Tiki Barber?
The Bears paid for an injured RB when they could have made a run at a healthy one who had over 2200 yards last year!Comment
-
Im not sure Darren Sproles was ever an option.. but I would've rather signed no RB at all then Barber. I dont see why hes really a big upgrade to Chester Taylor at this point.Comment
Comment