Drew Brees: Most Valuable Loser (2009 Edition.)

[dave]

I groan you for supporting a fraud, who goes by the name: Drew Brees.

I should groan Rush for making me use the word ''groan.''

Who says I was supporting Brees?
I was groaning you for accepting Hellisan's face read.
Retract the groan, Brenda Warner.

[Nukleopatra]

Who says I was supporting Brees?
.

Done.

For that reason alone.

[dave]

Be honest. You only retracted the groan because I called you Brenda Warner.

[Tailback U]

Everyone that has come over from MM is well aware of this kind of stuff from Nuk.

And it appears that the VSN'ers have quickly caught on as well, as this thread has gone absolutely nowhere so far.

I think you won, Nuk. Nobody cares to argue with you anymore. I think it's time to find something else that pisses you off and see if you can bait people into arguing with you about it.

[chubbz]

i think im the guy who posted the drew brees stuff in the first place. so here we go....
all im sayin is that the only times kurt warner has been succesful is when hes had the best reciever tandems in the league. he was just in the right place at the right time. wat did he do in ny? how about after the sb year? warner's just a guy who needs elite recievers to do well like manning and romo. brees doesnt seem to need that. my point from the start is like u said he does the most w the least. i said screw the w-l record. im talkin pure talent. its not hard to chuck it up to larry on a go route and have him moss two ppl. hell u saw brees do it in the pro bowl! any qb that was a back up will never be too great in my eyes. i guess im just stubborn. and dont post steve young he was a right time right place qb too. im sure brees will reach the playoffs next year and then we will c wat happens.
p.s. rich gannon lol

[Nukleopatra]

Got the first quarterback in a bit late, so I'll throw another up now.

Quarterbacks better than Drew Brees, since Drew's arrival in 2001.

02-26-09: 4:20pm.



Steve ''Air'' McNair: ''The Warrior.'' The media will have you know that Steve is quite possibly the only injury prone sack of shit, to ever play through pain. But it's not true. Plenty of NFL players do. Another one of my most hated NFL figures.

Career Record: 91 - 62.
Post Season Victories: 5.
Super bowl Appearances: 1.
Super bowl Victories: 0.

Steve McNair: He'll be remembered to most as a ''hero.'' But to me, he'll be remembered as the quarterback who was clearly over his head during the biggest game of his career, when he threw the ball five yards short of the endzone, forcing his wide out to make a nearly impossibly play against one of the faster defenses in the game. I can't help but to think: What if a smarter quarterback had to make that throw? It would have been in the endzone. No, Steve McNair will never know the glory of winning a super bowl, so Steve will have to settle for being.... better than Drew Brees.

[FirstTimer]

Better QB... Jim McMahon or Drew Brees?

[Nukleopatra]

Better QB... Jim McMahon or Drew Brees?

Good one.

Better record, more post season victories.. but complete shit player.

Damn you. Go back to Madden Mania.

[FirstTimer]

Drew Brees or Sid Luckman?

[chubbz]

it seems like ur whole thing is off playoff wins. y dont u go more off of td to int ratio or just his numbers period. most guys just ride there defenses or running games to those playoff victories. look at trent dilfer.........

[Nukleopatra]

it seems like ur whole thing is off playoff wins.

See the word ''loser'' in the thread title?

y dont u go more off of td to int ratio or just his numbers period.

I always thought the NFL was about winning... Well, and money. Do Saints fan really sit there and think ''Gee, I'll be happy with 6 victories, as long as Brees throws 30 TDs.'' I doubt it.

most guys just ride there defenses or running games to those playoff victories. look at trent dilfer.........

Yeah. It's not like Drew Brees had LT for four seasons, where LT broke 1600 yards in two of those seasons, all four putting up double digit TDs. Oh, and by the way, Drew Brees didn't win any playoff games in SD.

Do I need to draw a picture? I'm not saying Drew Brees sucks. I'm saying he's a incompetent loser. As in, he's not a winner. As in, he's barely over .500, with 1 playoff victory in 7 seasons. If I'm wrong, please, correct me.

[The Messenger]

Yeah. It's not like Drew Brees had LT for four seasons, where LT broke 1600 yards in two of those seasons, all four putting up double digit TDs. Oh, and by the way, Drew Brees didn't win any playoff games in SD.

Do I need to draw a picture? I'm not saying Drew Brees sucks. I'm saying he's a incompetent loser. As in, he's not a winner. As in, he's barely over .500, with 1 playoff victory in 7 seasons. If I'm wrong, please, correct me.

Horrible argument. You just got done arguing that season stats don't matter and it's about winning in the playoffs, what you do in the season doesn't matter.

However, you should know LT is a horrible playoff runningback. He's only had one good year in the post season, and that came with Philip Rivers.

So why bring LT into the discussion? Fail....

[Nukleopatra]

He's only had one good year in the post season, and that came with Philip Rivers.

No surprise there.

[The Messenger]

No surprise there.

Yeah I forgot, Philip Rivers possesses God-like run blocking abilities.

[Nukleopatra]

Philip possesses a lot of things Drew Brees doesn't.

I wouldn't be shocked if he was the better run blocker either.