Wacky BCS scenarios

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ZoneBlitz
    .
    • Feb 2009
    • 1844

    Originally posted by FirstTimer


    :obama:

    You're really not getting it?

    Coming from a proponant of a playoff system and the "BCS is the suxors" camp this argument is laughable.
    BCS sucks to pick the 2 best OVERALL teams in the country out of 120 teams, not to pick the 2 best teams inside a 12 team conference

    Comment

    • KNUBB
      WHITE RONDO
      • Jun 2009
      • 7973

      I feel like I have become dumber reading this exchange.


      Comment

      • FirstTimer
        Freeman Error

        • Feb 2009
        • 18720

        Originally posted by ZoneblitZ
        BCS sucks to pick the 2 best OVERALL teams in the country out of 120 teams, not to pick the 2 best teams inside a 12 team conference
        Why not dipshit?

        What's the magic number where the BCS sucks?

        Comment

        • ZoneBlitz
          .
          • Feb 2009
          • 1844

          Originally posted by KNUBB
          I feel like I have become dumber reading this exchange.
          Its not my fault people didnt understand a simple idea.

          Comment

          • ZoneBlitz
            .
            • Feb 2009
            • 1844

            Originally posted by FirstTimer
            Why not dipshit?
            Because 120 >>>> 12

            Comment

            • Sharkweather
              Senior Member
              • Jul 2009
              • 8906

              Originally posted by ZoneblitZ
              Whats so mind-blowing about picking the 2 highest ranked teams in a conference to play in the championship game?
              Expert recap and game analysis of the LSU Tigers vs. Alabama Crimson Tide NCAAF game from November 5, 2011 on ESPN.

              Comment

              • ZoneBlitz
                .
                • Feb 2009
                • 1844

                Originally posted by Sharkweather
                Yup, those the 2 best teams in the conference. They should play again.

                Comment

                • NAHSTE
                  Probably owns the site
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 22233

                  Originally posted by ZoneblitZ
                  I knew FirstTimer would be an asshole but i didnt expect everyone else to be so outraged by my idea.
                  I just don't see the logic behind it. The SEC CG is for the rare case that there are two teams that don't get to play during the season, and to turn Atlanta into an SEC convention for three days out of the year. It is not there to ensure that the two best teams play.

                  More often than not the two best teams will have already settled it on the field by then. In the rare case that they haven't (undefeated Alabama vs. undefeated Florida, 2009), it's a perfect set up.

                  Comment

                  • FirstTimer
                    Freeman Error

                    • Feb 2009
                    • 18720

                    Originally posted by ZoneblitZ
                    Because 120 >>>> 12
                    Wow.

                    Ground breaking stuff here.

                    You a math major?

                    Comment

                    • KNUBB
                      WHITE RONDO
                      • Jun 2009
                      • 7973

                      ZoneBlitz are you a Bama fan. Be real with us all. We can attempt to understand your logic if we know this key piece of info.


                      Comment

                      • KNUBB
                        WHITE RONDO
                        • Jun 2009
                        • 7973

                        Originally posted by ZoneblitZ
                        Yup, those the 2 best teams in the conference. They should play again.
                        Dude they have played already. Why should they get another chance. They lost.


                        Comment

                        • LiquidLarry2GhostWF
                          Highwayman
                          • Feb 2009
                          • 15428

                          Originally posted by ZoneblitZ
                          Dont worry i wont be here for long, i sense another hiatus coming.

                          Comment

                          • ZoneBlitz
                            .
                            • Feb 2009
                            • 1844

                            Originally posted by NAHSTE
                            I just don't see the logic behind it. The SEC CG is for the rare case that there are two teams that don't get to play during the year, (see: undefeated Alabama v. undefeated Florida, 2009), and to turn Atlanta into an SEC convention for three days out of the year. It is not there to ensure that teams can lose to an opponent get another chance down the road.

                            (Although in 2001, LSU did just that and ruined Tennessee's perfect season )
                            Oh by the way, i also proposed that the conference championship game be hosted by the highest ranked team, you guys gonna lynch me for that too? LOLZ

                            Was just an idea, you dont have to like it, if you think college football is fine how it is then enjoy it, i sure dont.

                            Comment

                            • FirstTimer
                              Freeman Error

                              • Feb 2009
                              • 18720

                              I love how Zoneblitz's idea basically would take the biggest regular season game of the year/the "Game of the Century" and renderit essentially meaningless

                              Comment

                              • KNUBB
                                WHITE RONDO
                                • Jun 2009
                                • 7973

                                God you suck dude


                                Comment

                                Working...