The Hypothetical 2011 NCAA Playoff Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hasselbeck
    Jus' bout dat action boss
    • Feb 2009
    • 6175

    The Hypothetical 2011 NCAA Playoff Thread

    If we weren't stuck with the worst system in all of sports, better known as the BCS, here is how a playoff would look. I incorporated 4 different models .. two 4 team ones, an 8 team, and a 16 team.

    4-Team (Plus 1) Model
    #4 Stanford at #1 LSU
    #3 Oklahoma State at #2 Alabama

    4-Team Top Conference Winners Model (Using BCS Rankings)
    #10 Wisconsin at #1 LSU
    #5 Oregon at #3 Oklahoma State

    8-Team Model Using BCS Rankings
    #8 Kansas State at #1 LSU
    #5 Oregon at #4 Stanford

    #6 Arkansas at #3 Oklahoma State
    #7 Boise State at #2 Alabama

    16-Team Model (Conference Champs Get Auto Bids, 5 At Large Bids)
    #16 Louisiana Tech at #1 LSU
    #9 Wisconsin at #8 Kansas State

    #13 West Virginia at #4 Stanford
    #12 Southern Miss at #5 Oregon

    #11 TCU at #6 Arkansas
    #14 Northern Illinois at #3 Oklahoma State

    #10 Clemson at #7 Boise State
    #15 Arkansas State at #2 Alabama

    Die BCS. Die.
    Originally posted by ram29jackson
    I already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SB
  • DoubleDeuce
    Spellin' n' shit
    • Feb 2009
    • 5873

    #2
    The 8 team and the 4 team (plus one) are best IMO.

    Comment

    • Hasselbeck
      Jus' bout dat action boss
      • Feb 2009
      • 6175

      #3
      I think a 16-team would be fun.. but how good does that 8 team one look? Not a bad matchup in the group.
      Originally posted by ram29jackson
      I already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SB

      Comment

      • Sportsbuck
        Buckeye For Life
        • Dec 2008
        • 3045

        #4
        Just an FYI Hass... on your second one, Boise didn't win their own conference, TCU did.

        Comment

        • nflman2033
          George Brett of VSN
          • Apr 2009
          • 2393

          #5
          Originally posted by DoubleDeuce
          The 8 team and the 4 team (plus one) are best IMO.
          this

          Comment

          • Hasselbeck
            Jus' bout dat action boss
            • Feb 2009
            • 6175

            #6
            Originally posted by Sportsbuck
            Just an FYI Hass... on your second one, Boise didn't win their own conference, TCU did.
            Good catch.
            Originally posted by ram29jackson
            I already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SB

            Comment

            • Leftwich
              Bring on the Season

              • Oct 2008
              • 13700

              #7
              That West Virginia vs Stanford game would be good. But wouldn't you rather have the games at neutral sites so the bowl locations would still get paid?

              Originally posted by Tailback U
              It won't say shit, because dying is for pussies.

              Comment

              • Hasselbeck
                Jus' bout dat action boss
                • Feb 2009
                • 6175

                #8
                Originally posted by glenwillett
                16 teams is asking these kids to play too many games IMO. Especially with the top programs involved you are asking these kids to put a lot on the line for something they probably won't even care about the day they sign their first pro deal.
                How's that any different than a college BB team playing 35 games a year if their team makes a run in March?

                NFL sched is 16 games not counting playoffs either.. so.. not like these kids waiting to sign that first pro deal are going to get to play a lighter schedule.
                Originally posted by ram29jackson
                I already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SB

                Comment

                • Hasselbeck
                  Jus' bout dat action boss
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 6175

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Leftwich
                  That West Virginia vs Stanford game would be good. But wouldn't you rather have the games at neutral sites so the bowl locations would still get paid?
                  Not really no.

                  If you're LSU - you deserve homefield the whole way up until the National Championship.. similar to Green Bay in the NFC playoffs.

                  Not to mention.. a playoff game in Baton Rouge or Tuscaloosa or really ANY of these venues would sell out in a HEARTBEAT. That's not so guaranteed with neutral sites involved.
                  Originally posted by ram29jackson
                  I already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SB

                  Comment

                  • Leftwich
                    Bring on the Season

                    • Oct 2008
                    • 13700

                    #10
                    So the national championship would be at a neutral location?

                    Originally posted by Tailback U
                    It won't say shit, because dying is for pussies.

                    Comment

                    • Hasselbeck
                      Jus' bout dat action boss
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 6175

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Leftwich
                      So the national championship would be at a neutral location?
                      Yes.

                      Hell they could even host the Final 4 (in an 8 or 16 team model) at the sites of the BCS games if they'd like. That way there are still Rose, Fiesta, Sugar and Orange Bowls - only this time with something actually on the line in each of these games.
                      Originally posted by ram29jackson
                      I already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SB

                      Comment

                      • FirstTimer
                        Freeman Error

                        • Feb 2009
                        • 18720

                        #12
                        Zone's playoff is pretty decent:


                        1) LSU (bye)
                        2) Okie State (bye)

                        3) Oregon
                        6) TCU

                        4) Wisconsin
                        5) Clemson

                        Comment

                        • Hasselbeck
                          Jus' bout dat action boss
                          • Feb 2009
                          • 6175

                          #13
                          Originally posted by FirstTimer
                          Zone's playoff is pretty decent:


                          1) LSU (bye)
                          2) Okie State (bye)

                          3) Oregon
                          6) TCU

                          4) Wisconsin
                          5) Clemson
                          I like that, but I think Alabama is more deserving to be in there (in this model) than Oregon, TCU, Wisconsin and Clemson.

                          I see what he's trying to do by adding importance to winning the conference.. but leaving Alabama out of any playoff this season would be wrong too.
                          Originally posted by ram29jackson
                          I already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SB

                          Comment

                          • Atlas
                            BRACK FRIDAY BUNDURU!!!!!
                            • Feb 2010
                            • 7949

                            #14
                            expand ZB's into a 12 team, add some at large bids, and its perfect...

                            Comment

                            • G-men
                              Posts too much
                              • Nov 2011
                              • 7579

                              #15
                              My favorite playoff idea is an 8-team playoff with the 4 best conference winner (home) and then the top 4 at large teams (away). If another conference winner is in the at-large spots, they obviously get in. If not, too bad, you probably aren't good enough anyway to deserve a spot. It also gives more of a meaning to winning your conference because it gives you home field advantage. I don't see any reason teams could complain about getting "snubbed" from this playoff because you know exactly what you have to do before the season starts. And obviously, for this to work best, preseason polls would have to be done away with.

                              Based on this season it would look like.

                              #1 LSU vs. #8 Boise State
                              #2 Oklahoma State vs. #7 Arkansas
                              #3 Oregon vs. #6 Stanford
                              #4 Wisconsin vs. #5 Alabama

                              Comment

                              Working...