Steelers won't retain Hines Ward

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ThomasTomasz
    • Nov 2024

    Steelers won't retain Hines Ward

    The Pittsburgh Steelers, with a Hines Ward roster-bonus deadline fast approaching, have decided not to keep the veteran receiver, the NFL Network has reported, citing unnamed sources.

    Ward, who lost his starting job in 2011, was scheduled to make $4 million in the last two years of his contract but has said he was willing to take a pay cut.

    A decision is required by March 1 to satisfy a clause in his contract.

    "I plan on playing with the Pittsburgh Steelers and going from there," Ward said last Thursday during Super Bowl week.

    Speaking at the media center in Indianapolis, Ward called reports about his possible retirement "rumors," reiterating he wants to play next season.

    Asked if he wanted to play three, four or five more years, the 35-year-old Ward laughed and said, "I don't know about that long."

    http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/75...rd-report-says
  • Primetime
    Thank You Prince
    • Nov 2008
    • 17526

    #2
    They'll rework the deal. Hes not going anywhere.

    Comment

    • Aso
      The Serious House
      • Nov 2008
      • 11137

      #3
      I think they will get rid of him. His role was diminished a ton by the end of last year and I don't think he brings much to the table as a receiver anymore. Couple that with him probably being the teams 4th receiver and not playing special teams. Then it also being publicly known that the Steelers have yet to contact him. All signs point towards the team parting ways.

      Comment

      • BrntO4Life
        My Aunt Ida Smokes.
        • Mar 2009
        • 6866

        #4
        Ward is a turdlicker.

        Nothing pissed me off more than seeing him as the only on-field survivor in the trailer for The Dark Knight Rises.

        Comment

        • Warner2BruceTD
          2011 Poster Of The Year
          • Mar 2009
          • 26142

          #5
          If he's willing to take a pay cut, the Steelers should take him back and stash him on the back end of the roster. He can't be any worse than whatever UFA scrub they will likely have in that roster slot, and it's pretty obvious he wants to stay even at a reduced salary and role.

          It really annoyed me as a fan in 2008 when the Rams cut Isaac Bruce loose over $1M. He was willing to take a pay cut to stay, and the gap was $1M. He not only ended up on the hated 49ers, but he promptly proved he could still play by leading them in all three receiving categories. Drew Bennett replaced Bruce in the starting lineup and caught one pass.

          Comment

          • red33
            Junior Member
            • Feb 2009
            • 5065

            #6
            I always figured the steelers took care of there players a oil better then other teams. Ward has been an integral part of that team for a long time and probably have his number retired by them. You would think they could keep him for a small amount of money.

            Comment

            • RosettaStoned
              Throbbing Tebowner
              • Oct 2008
              • 9951

              #7
              Originally posted by red33
              I always figured the steelers took care of there players a oil better then other teams. Ward has been an integral part of that team for a long time and probably have his number retired by them. You would think they could keep him for a small amount of money.
              No we usually dump them a year early. Hines got the benefit of playing a year longer than most.


              I wish we could keep him, I love Hines. He's one of the all time great Steelers. If there is one thing I know though, is that the Steeler's front office knows what they're doing. I hope he retires, I don't want to see him in another jersey.
              So, metaphorically speaking, our physiology basically has the universe mapped out and you're thinking it needs to be taught addition & subtraction.

              -Alan Aragon

              Comment

              • TuxedoYoda
                Noob
                • Feb 2012
                • 37

                #8
                Some WR poor team like the Skins or Browns will overpay for him and he'll have a crap 2012 season.

                Comment

                • strahanfan92
                  Meat
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 5456

                  #9
                  Originally posted by TuxedoYoda
                  he'll have a crap 2012 season.

                  Comment

                  • Aso
                    The Serious House
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 11137

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Warner2BruceTD
                    If he's willing to take a pay cut, the Steelers should take him back and stash him on the back end of the roster. He can't be any worse than whatever UFA scrub they will likely have in that roster slot, and it's pretty obvious he wants to stay even at a reduced salary and role.

                    It really annoyed me as a fan in 2008 when the Rams cut Isaac Bruce loose over $1M. He was willing to take a pay cut to stay, and the gap was $1M. He not only ended up on the hated 49ers, but he promptly proved he could still play by leading them in all three receiving categories. Drew Bennett replaced Bruce in the starting lineup and caught one pass.
                    I don't like the comparison though. Bruce didn't average 8 yards a catch his final season. Bruce was also a starter before being let go, Ward will likely be the teams 4th receiver come the 2012 season (if he were to be kept). Hines Ward won't be leading anyone in any receiving categories. I don't like the comparison because I think the situations are entirely different. I think the Steelers will and should get rid of him.

                    Comment

                    • Aso
                      The Serious House
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 11137

                      #11
                      Well now it's announced he's gonna be cut.

                      I'm just waiting for him to either go unsigned or be signed and have an incredibly bad 2012 for some shitty team.

                      Comment

                      • JOHNNYTHECLOWN
                        WAAAASSSSUUUUP
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 3422

                        #12


                        never been a fan because he's a steeler... but he didn't look like he had much in the tank anyway

                        Comment

                        • BigBucs
                          Unpretentious
                          • May 2009
                          • 12758

                          #13
                          Damn man. And you wonder why these athletes try to bleed these teams for all they can when its time to get paid. Some players should never hit the open market no matter the circumstances.




                          Comment

                          • j.hen
                            Self Care
                            • Oct 2008
                            • 10058

                            #14
                            Come play the slot in ATL for the vet minimum.

                            Comment

                            • Shayn•Da•Pain
                              Laughs Unlimited
                              • Nov 2008
                              • 5204

                              #15
                              He's still got plenty of ball left in the tank, for the right team. He's a 3rd down magnet, still a hard blocker, and having him on the field will help somebody out there win games. If there's a team that has some playmakers already but just needs a possession guy, or somebody who can come in and be a leader, Hines is that dude.

                              I hope this helps out retaining Wallace!
                              sigpic

                              Comment

                              Working...